Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-02-2010, 09:46 AM   #1
Member
Kirk Allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Gardner View Post
I think that's an old wives tale and it's just not true. Anyone who's going to make a claim like that is going to have to establish they owned the gun in the first place, i.e. a police report that was filed in the past listing that gun as bing stolen. The police aren't going to get involved with any less evidence that a crime has been committed.
I wish that were the case but it is in fact the main reason people dont share the numbers on line. It has happen and if you want to count on the police to be good at their job then you have more faith in the system than I do.

Its easy to file a report that the gun is missing with the claim you dont know how long its been missing for. Its happen and will continue as long as we have crooks amungst us.

The other issue is duplication. Yes its pretty hard to duplicate a Parker but look at the AR industry and you see a lot of people doing builds on their own and some actualy do copy others serial numbers.
Kirk Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 09:56 AM   #2
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,196
Thanks: 7,172
Thanked 10,734 Times in 5,620 Posts

Default

To be the devil's advocate, I had a gun stolen, did not report it properly. Today, after many years, I found that it is in the hands of an innocent third party. I have no feeling whatever that I could begin to recover that gun under any known law or legal procedure.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:03 AM   #3
Member
Setter Man
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,802
Thanks: 1,717
Thanked 1,642 Times in 640 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk Allen View Post
I wish that were the case but it is in fact the main reason people don't share the numbers on line. It has happen and if you want to count on the police to be good at their job then you have more faith in the system than I do.

Its easy to file a report that the gun is missing with the claim you don't know how long its been missing for. Its happen and will continue as long as we have crooks amungst us.

The other issue is duplication. Yes its pretty hard to duplicate a Parker but look at the AR industry and you see a lot of people doing builds on their own and some actually do copy others serial numbers.
It may be the main reason that people don't post the serial numbers, that's true, but there is virtually no reason to be fearful. As for filing a false police report, it's a felony, and I know there are a lot of stupid people in the world (and I have represented my fair share) but again, you have to have proof you owned the gun in the first place.

It's a free country so feel free to be as paranoid as you want, but you have very little to fear by posting a serial number on the web.
Jay Gardner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 09:53 AM   #4
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,714 Times in 2,677 Posts

Default

If that is true, a person should keep their gun secret, never post pictures,and never have pictures of the gun published.

In many years of fooling about with old guns, I have never heard of what you suggest.

But I suppose its true that people can and do make unprovable and far fetched claims. There are crackpots out there.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:01 AM   #5
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,714 Times in 2,677 Posts

Default

What! Are you implying that some documentary proof might be required? Bill, its much more fun to wildly speculate.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:15 AM   #6
Member
Rod N. Gunn
Forum Associate
 
Dave Fuller's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
Thanks: 117
Thanked 177 Times in 62 Posts

Default

I have little insight into the criminal mind. However, if I were going to try the false reporting scheme I would select one of the many high grade, high condition guns posted here. I think I would not go after the well-worn, buggered-up, lower grade ones.
Dave Fuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:46 AM   #7
Member
Kirk Allen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Default

I think posting the serial number is quite different than providing it to an inquiring buyer.

Yes, you have to have known the property was stolen to be "charged", and at the least, like I stated they take it from you. At the worst, you have to deal with lots of questions with implicaitons leaning towards you knew. My father went through this very process when he purchased some stuff at a garage sale and it was not pretty becuase the cops basically insisted he knew it was stolen because of the price.

Anyway, any thoughts on the guns value?
Kirk Allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:51 AM   #8
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,196
Thanks: 7,172
Thanked 10,734 Times in 5,620 Posts

Default

Mr. Allen, the gun is not rare and it is worth more than $500, so both of your advisors are not tuned in to the gun market. People who know the Parker gun market well number more than a covey but fewer than a flock.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 10:55 AM   #9
Member
Rod N. Gunn
Forum Associate
 
Dave Fuller's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 429
Thanks: 117
Thanked 177 Times in 62 Posts

Default

1890's vintage 10's are far from rare, they may somehow be rare in that particular configuration. Barring some uncommon attribute that has not been pointed out here, I'd say the gun is worth less than $1000. But the right answers to the many questions posed above could well prove me wrong.
Dave Fuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2010, 11:07 AM   #10
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,714 Times in 2,677 Posts

Default

Lots of Damascus Grade 2 extractor 10ga guns out there.. A person can check on numerous sales sites to see what others are asking . This gun has condition issues and would need work.

There is good reason to check mirror bores on a 115 year old waterfowler.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.