Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-12-2026, 08:56 PM   #11
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,990
Thanks: 41,193
Thanked 38,002 Times in 13,790 Posts

Default

And then there are documented 11 gauge Parkers.

Charlie price had documented 112 factory 11 gauge guns, all but one having four-digit serial numbers... that one is ser. no. 46740
this one, 16513 because it was rebored at a later date, may have missed the records...? JMHO

Maybe the barrel shop at Parker Bros. thought removing that additional .015" would compromise the barrel walls...?



.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-13-2026, 08:22 AM   #12
Member
78CJ
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 168
Thanks: 17
Thanked 162 Times in 64 Posts

Default

Thanks again Chuck for the consise letter!

There was considerable deliberation as to whether or not the 12 gauge barrels had been altered to 10 bore. I don't remember the exact measurements but we concluded that in order to have taken them to 10 bore the original BWT would have had to have been in the neighborhood of .080. However, I was surprised to find that when I got home and weighed them that they came in at exactly 3 pounds. Unstruck weight was 4.4.

It seems we will never know. The only thing we discussed is whether or not there would be more information in the ledger book columns that were not able to be copied originally. It seems odd the "make 10" would not have included a length.

Thoughts?

Ryan

Last edited by Ryan Brege; 05-13-2026 at 08:22 AM.. Reason: grammar
Ryan Brege is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-13-2026, 08:43 AM   #13
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,990
Thanks: 41,193
Thanked 38,002 Times in 13,790 Posts

Default

Again, my thought of 11 gauge seems to be supported by your measurement of .760”


.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0052.jpg (515.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0053.jpg (389.6 KB, 0 views)
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 05-15-2026, 01:26 PM   #14
Member
78CJ
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 168
Thanks: 17
Thanked 162 Times in 64 Posts

Default

Just remembered I have a 10 Gauge snap cap. It's a 10 Gauge.
Ryan Brege is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ryan Brege For Your Post:
Unread 05-15-2026, 04:12 PM   #15
Member
Dylan Rhodes
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 430
Thanks: 269
Thanked 714 Times in 216 Posts

Default

I have a documented 11 gauge and 10 gauge caps don’t fit. For what that’s worth.
Dylan Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dylan Rhodes For Your Post:
Unread 06-05-2026, 03:07 PM   #16
Member
ArtS
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 1,170
Thanks: 111
Thanked 1,682 Times in 624 Posts

Default

Interesting thread. In addition to the 12 ga guns coming normally with 11 ga tubes, the 10 ga came normally with 9 ga tubes. This according to The Parker Story. I have five pre 1880 10 ga guns and a similar number of 12 ga guns of the same period. Every gun I own measured exactly to the 11 ga and 9 ga specs, although I have had a few of them cleaned up. I have no doubt that the gun was originally a 12 ga with 11 ga tubes and was rebored by Parker to as close to 10 ga as they thought safe. They obviously did not get to the full bore dimension but did rechamber.

An interesting side discussion is whether they targeted 9 ga or 10 ga. They ended the practice within a couple of years of the gun being made. The date of the conversion isn't listed unless I missed it. I would presume they would do the conversion work under their current system of using correct bore sizes. If it had been attempted when the 9 gauge tubes were the norm, they wouldn't have been able to come close to the standard.
Arthur Shaffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.