![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
milt a 2 3/4 inch 12 ga hull will not hold 9 1/2 drams of powder and 2 1/2 ounce of shot is what i m really saying... charlie
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#4 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Thanks Gary, If you read that carefully, there is no confusion. It is what it is. And I am not surprised at that proof testing.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Most likely an advertisement ploy. Not unusual back then. Most companys were interested in selling their product and they didn't care how they did it.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
I proof tested a Winchester Model 1901 ten gauge cannon with as much powder as the shell would hold (eight drams of black) and more powder up the barrel with a wad in front. I made the mistake of firing it while the cannon was on top of a wood pile instead of on the ground. The cannon did a back flip and landed on the asphalt of my driveway. I guess it was a soft surface, because the cast iron carriage of the cannon was not damaged. This is probably how Winchester did the 9 dram test. Of course, there was no shot in front of my cannon load.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
woulda loved to seen that bill...charlie
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
Bruce, do you know how many 97's were made with damascus?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
I don't know.
But here is the one pound test. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|