![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I don't have a Repo. Which one were you referring to, the DHE? It was completed in 1928/29. A little more info. The Wingmaster barrel was backbored by a former cardshooter for extremely tight patterns. It is now .062" constriction (XXXXF ? ). I've shot a few sporting clays with it and found it handles surprisingly well. I do not expect it to pattern well with larger (5s, 4s, etc.) shot for waterfowl, but will get around to testing it eventually.
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Stan Hillis For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
Stan, I don't know how I got a Repro in my head. Great guns.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | |||||||
|
Quote:
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Let’s remember, Askins was writing about paper shells with fiber wads and bare shot. A far cry from modern shells with the shot cushioned on setback and protected from scrubbing during the bore run, both by polymer shotcups.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
He also hated the "slow" and "light" shells we routinely shoot. You know, 12g, 7/8 oz at 1170.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|