Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-29-2021, 05:37 PM   #21
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 388 Times in 225 Posts

Default

Bill many people would look at the cold blued Titanic and accept it as factory back in the day. I suppose Bernard steel would have been more believable. The nitro proofs raise a red flag and how about that serial which exceeds Parker production by more than 30,000. Peter Johnson may not have been the most knowledgeable Parker collector but he cultivated a great deal of interest in Parkers and American doubles in general for having taken the time to write the book.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 09:44 AM   #22
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,067
Thanks: 1,331
Thanked 5,702 Times in 1,575 Posts

Default

Richard, the GHE is more likely 3 iron crolle. If you can see the dividing line that splits a crolle, follow it to the next dividing line. Count the full crolles and 2 split crolles and you have your total. The dividing lines are sometimes hard to see but the lower DH is easily seen.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:57 AM   #23
Member
Keith Doty
PGCA Member
 
Keith Doty's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 700
Thanks: 840
Thanked 947 Times in 384 Posts

Default

The altered serial number intrigues me. WHY? Isn't that a big issue with ATF?
Keith Doty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 02:24 PM   #24
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,305
Thanks: 7,252
Thanked 10,855 Times in 5,676 Posts

Default

Pre 1899 serial number, ATF does not consider this a gun. You can stamp what you want on it.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 04:44 PM   #25
Member
Brian H
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Hornacek's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 929
Thanks: 2,312
Thanked 5,067 Times in 559 Posts

Default

Is this the gun that someone stamped nitro proof on the barrel flat?
Brian Hornacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 05:34 PM   #26
Member
Jim DiSpagno
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 6
Thanked 3,037 Times in 889 Posts

Default

Yes Brian.
Jim DiSpagno is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-30-2021, 06:07 PM   #27
Member
Craig Budgeon
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 508
Thanks: 144
Thanked 388 Times in 225 Posts

Default

The gun is unique though as it is the only double gun I can remember that only has 1 barrel nitro proofed.
Craig Budgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Craig Budgeon For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:08 PM   #28
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,199
Thanks: 4,971
Thanked 3,203 Times in 1,039 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
One would not need to read Johnson's book to recognize that rendering of "Titanic" as an alteration of the factory marking. There was a great wealth of Parker knowledge in the years before Johnson's book was published.
So how does someone restamp TITANIC over DAMASCUS that has been removed, yet one can still see the Damascus pattern in the rib below the roll stamp with no evidence of filing/grinding and welding up? Isn't it just possible that it was a rare mistake?
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 10-30-2021, 11:36 PM   #29
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,512
Thanks: 4,138
Thanked 6,795 Times in 1,638 Posts

Default

Jerry you have a point there. Although with all of the other unusual markings I tend to agree something not so straight up took place on this gun.
SN is 27404 which was made in 1882. When did Titanic steel barrels come out?
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-31-2021, 05:40 AM   #30
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 33,990
Thanks: 41,197
Thanked 38,002 Times in 13,790 Posts

Default

74842

Titanic barrels were first introduced in 1897 I believe.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.