Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-08-2018, 02:20 PM   #1
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,490
Thanks: 4,117
Thanked 6,777 Times in 1,632 Posts

Default

I have stated a number of times the effectivness of # 9 shot on pointed Mearns quail. My hunting partner likes the 10’s. I used #10’s spreaders this last season in my Remington 12 gauge DEO that is choked F/F. Shooting RST’s. Killed with authority. Under 25 yards I have nothing but positive things to say.

That said not so effective on the late season skittish Gamble and Scale quail. Shot some 6 and 7 1/2 shot, killed much better. These birds were getting up at 30 yards plus a lot of times.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 02:40 PM   #2
Member
terc
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 293
Thanks: 267
Thanked 345 Times in 105 Posts

Default

Tom, I'll have to look a closer this October.
Dave Tercek is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 02:41 PM   #3
Member
Brush Buster
PGCA Member
Second Badge
 
Russ Jackson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 3,568
Thanked 3,933 Times in 1,200 Posts

Default

I always skin Pheasants and Pluck Grouse ,I also skin Woodcock for what this information is worth ! I have used #10 Shot in a 28 Gauge for years , it is for whatever reason a wonderful Woodcock load and seems to do well on Grouse also ! Like Dave T ,I really never thought shot penetration was a huge deal in Grouse or Woodcock as it surely is in Pheasant Hunting where I have even gone as large as #5 in late season birds that have had a lot of hunting pressure , Well Dave maybe it is just a Pennsylvania way of reasoning !
Russ Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 03:02 PM   #4
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

I don’t think penetration is a big deal in grouse hunting either although #9 shot will often penetrate the bird to wind up under the skin on the far side.

As far as skinning grouse, in my youth after tiring of picking a bunch of birds, I asked my grandfather if I could skin some of them to save time. He told me that anyone who skins a partridge doesn’t deserve to eat one. Harsh words but I got his point. I have never skinned a game bird.

Woodcock have a bit of fat under the skin on both sides of the backbone. Skinning would remove this fat which is beneficial in roasting. To each his own, but I’ll go with my grandfather’s ways.

Just a note, the New York city market of the 1800’s would never accept a skinned bird or one with a lot of shot in it. The market buyers were very particular back in the day.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 03:44 PM   #5
Member
Reggie B
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Reggie Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,979
Thanks: 3,574
Thanked 4,598 Times in 1,709 Posts

Default

Game birds are plucked. Rabbits and squirrels are skinned. Also you don't cut the heads or fins off a trout!
__________________
"A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way."
Reggie Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 06:17 PM   #6
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,919
Thanks: 6,774
Thanked 9,556 Times in 4,211 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Bishop View Post
Game birds are plucked. Rabbits and squirrels are skinned. Also you don't cut the heads or fins off a trout!
To each his own ! I “pluck” the breast from dove Grouse quail and pheasent . Heck the last several turkey I slam dunked got the breasts removed from them . I also remove the head and tail from trout . In my older age I do not have the time nor the inclination to pluck feathers from birds .
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Unread 04-08-2018, 04:09 PM   #7
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,254 Times in 425 Posts

Default

AMEN!!!!!
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 05:08 PM   #8
Member
Rick Riddell
Forum Associate
 
Rick Riddell's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 653
Thanks: 339
Thanked 658 Times in 186 Posts

Default

Interesting piece, I've always liked using 10's. Never had any issues with lost or running birds. There seems to be a lot of criticism regarding that shot size, but I think its knowing your gun and your limitations.
Rick Riddell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 05:33 PM   #9
Member
todd allen
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,282
Thanks: 2,372
Thanked 3,578 Times in 1,230 Posts

Default

So, I've got my buddy from Vegas over last Friday, for dinner. He's my hunting and shooting partner, for well over 30 years. Dinner's over, were sitting on the back porch enjoying an adult beverage, and I bring up the topic from Tom's welcome back post regarding hunting grouse with #10 shot. Chuck is as close to a ballistics expert as anyone this side of SAMMI, having done a lifetime of research on what drops a pigeon in the ring.
His first reaction is, whaaat? That's crazy! Next thing you know, we've got shot diameter, weight in grains, velocity, energy calcs, and journee's formula going.
Then, Chuck came up with a theory. I said, yeah, let's find out. We've got the guns, got the time and equipment, we need some number 10 shot. We will get to the bottom of this.
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2018, 06:22 PM   #10
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 9,919
Thanks: 6,774
Thanked 9,556 Times in 4,211 Posts

Default

To the best of my knowledge I’ve never fired any #10 or #12 shot I do however remmember reading about #12 a bit more in old dog training books and in a couple of Havilah Babcock books . The training books suggested dusting hard headed pointers/Setters at about forty yards (never was inclined to try) . Babcock suggested the would be quail hunter that had a hard time hitting should use these to get ones confidence back up on a covey rise (never was inclined to try that either).
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.