Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-22-2012, 08:59 PM   #1
Member
Jack Selman
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 104
Thanks: 210
Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts

Default

Dean, Chuck has pointed out that the checkering on the cheeks differ, one side from the other. On closer examination, it appears that oil/stain makes it look as if the checkering is taken all the way out to the receiver. The wood is dark against the receiver, giving it the look of continuous checkering. Otherwise, the checkering is nice. And the drop of 3" fits me like a glove.

Brian, as for the 'step' from the cheeks' wood to the adjacent metal, that is no illusion. The walnut is a few thou below the metal. I'll sweat that when my grandson is shooting it! But it is another mystery.........what all has gone on with this C?
Jack Selman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-23-2012, 03:15 PM   #2
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,345
Thanks: 555
Thanked 20,741 Times in 5,193 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Selman View Post
Brian, as for the 'step' from the cheeks' wood to the adjacent metal, that is no illusion. The walnut is a few thou below the metal. I'll sweat that when my grandson is shooting it! But it is another mystery.........what all has gone on with this C?

You had noted the lack of a S/N under the guard. This hints to it being a replacement stock.
Also, checkered action panels were not typically used on C grades. And the shape of yours in relation to the action panels looks below Parker quality. So that is most likely not original to the gun.
Also, the Checkering on the grip LOOKS like it might be finer than the checkering on the forend. But I cannot see both in the same picture, so it is hard to tell.

And if the wood is low against the metal, I would say that it was made that way from the start, or it was oversanded in a refinish at some time.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 05-23-2012, 06:56 PM   #3
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,060
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 5,684 Times in 1,570 Posts

Default

Brian,

The order book states to Panel and Checker the sides of the stock. The one panel looks pretty good, the other side not as good. The question is still is the stock a Parker Stock?
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-23-2012, 06:58 PM   #4
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,060
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 5,684 Times in 1,570 Posts

Default

Brian,

The order book states to Panel and Checker the sides of the stock. The one panel looks pretty good, the other side not as good. The picture of the side of the stock Jack showed above is the good one. The question is still is the stock a Parker Stock?
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.