 |
|
 |
|
| Notices |
Welcome to the new PGCA Forum! As well, since it
is new - please read the following:
This is a new forum - so you must REGISTER to this Forum before posting;
If you are not a PGCA Member, we do not allow posts selling, offering or brokering firearms and/or parts; and
You MUST REGISTER your REAL FIRST and LAST NAME as your login name.
To register:
Click here..................
If you are registered to the forum and keep getting logged
out: Please
Click Here...
Welcome & enjoy!
To read the Posts, Messages & Threads in the PGCA Forum, you must be REGISTERED and LOGGED INTO your account! To Register, as a New User please see the Registration Link Above. If you are registered, but not Logged In, please Log in with your account Username and Password found on this page to the top right.
|
 |
|
 |
08-01-2011, 10:15 AM
|
#1
|
Member
|
|
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,995
Thanks: 554
Thanked 15,715 Times in 2,677 Posts
|
|
OK , I think I have it now. So when you were responding to a post about the Johnson book and specifically mentioning quote "the Johnson Research Materials" , you weren't really specifically talking about the Johnson materials, but rather continued grousing about you not being given access to the Parker gun records kept by the PGCA .
The so called "Black Hole of Curatorship" as relating to the PGCA is a figment of imagination and bears no resemblance to fact. You just haven't been given the access you want. Others, even including Muderlak, benefitted in legitimate research done by Mark Conrad for publication purposes. The Muderlak President Harrison gun article and the Hogan Czars gun articles come readily to mind. Those involved extensive PGCA records research. The PGCA shares their "stuff" all the time with legitimate writers and researchers who publish articles for the benefit of the Parker collecting community.
|
|
|
|
08-01-2011, 10:26 AM
|
#2
|
Member
|
PGCA Lifetime Member Since Second Grade
|
Member Info
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 17,269
Thanks: 7,220
Thanked 10,816 Times in 5,656 Posts
|
|
I think Peter Harris' statement is short and to the point. My statement is not short, but it is also to the point and I am sticking with it. Not too long ago, you replied to me with a similar statement, attempting to trap me into placing blame for the Black Hole on Mark Conrad. As I replied to you then, Mark Conrad has been nothing but extremely helpful to me for many years.
|
|
|
|