![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | |||||||
|
Quote:
A while back I posed a question about steel crystallization in these old guns and our resident metallurgist Edgar talked about it. I think I was refering to maybe fluid steel guns that can have thin barrels, but he put that thought to rest. Obvioulsy the forging process in these twist and damascus is different and there some instances of failures from innerstructure corrosion from years of early abuse and pitting. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Todd Poer For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
“Innerstructure corrosion”. As a layman I can’t imagine a more insidious-sounding barrel affliction.
If it does exist in a set of barrels, there seems currently to be no way to check for it. Barrel thickness gauging would be irrelevant to determine its presence, extent or the frangibility of the metal affected. “Shiny”; “pitted”; “bulged”, “dented” and “scuffed” are all observable, manifest descriptions of metal surfaces. Conversely, “innerstructure corrosion” is inherently latent. Drew H. has said elsewhere on this Forum that: “No standards exist for radiography of pattern welded barrels, and x-rays can not differentiate between defects within the barrel wall, and pits on the interior surface”. And further, “It has been my hope that a NDT expert with access to testing facilities, and doublegun interest, might develop a pattern welded barrel evaluation service. To my knowledge that has not yet occurred”. Are there any recorded mishaps that with reasonable assurance can be attributed to “innerstructure corrosion”?
__________________
"First off I scoured the Internet and this seems to be the place to be!” — Chad Whittenburg, 5-12-19 |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Russell E. Cleary For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
Long answer, and the short version of "Zircon's" metallurgic study of the GH & VH barrels
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...K7G9IBs4g/edit Short answer Welds can fail ![]() Properly fabricated pattern welded barrels do NOT develop "orange lace"; "interlaminar elecrolytic [sic] corrosion" nor embrittlement (crystallization) Freshly cut twist and crolle damascus barrels ![]() Looooong answer https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...hIiY62Hx4/edit
__________________
http://sites.google.com/a/damascuskn...e.com/www/home Last edited by Drew Hause; 07-27-2018 at 12:47 PM.. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
With the wads available back at the time your family Parker Bros. was made, the recommendation for these guns was to use over-size wads -- 9-gauge wads in 10-gauge guns and 11-gauge wads in 12-gauge guns. Note the loads No. 56 and 57 for Parker Bros. guns in this 1886-7 Chamberlin Cartridge Co. catalog --
1886-7 page 6.jpg 1886-7 page 7.jpg These old Parker Bros. guns with their over-size bores have been used for the last hundred and twenty years or so with regular wads. Over-bore barrels have been in and out of fashion throughout the history of cartridge shotguns. Today we have a number of trap shooters banging away with Stan Baker "Big-Bore" barrels with .800-inch bores all the way to the choke?!? |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I can, as least conceptually, see where corrosive residue from primers and powder, will form acidic compounds given enough moisture. This would be much more serious in pattern welded barrels, less so in carbon steel barrels of reasonable metallurgy and sound heat treat practice. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to edgarspencer For Your Post: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|