![]() |
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage! | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
#3 | ||||||
|
Going through the same process. I have a lot invested in both PP and DGJ; early articles and reports of events, shows, etc. Not easy to let them go but we who helped create them should rightfully share them with younger generations coming on either by fair sale or donations. That way you know the interest is genuinely there and hopefully will be perpetuated.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post: |
|
|
#4 | ||||||
|
I think a reasonable starting bid value at the Annual Meeting Silent Auction should be somewhere upward of $100 and let the bidding follow.
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#5 | ||||||
|
I’m certain that there is a treasure trove of Parker “stuff” out there that would be great to keep in the Parker “family”. Perhaps we could co-op one of the lesser used forums and use it as a “donation” auction forum. Just spit balling but owner posts item for a standard, predetermined period of time, high bid is always plus shipping. Checks to PGCA, notify seller when received, owner ships (as further donation) or recovers from buyer. It would take some level of monitoring/management. I would volunteer to take the lead and recruit some help.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Dan Steingraber For Your Post: |
|
|
#6 | ||||||
|
Yikes Steiner, What a great idea❗️
.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man. Not because I think they're better than the other breeds, but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture." George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post: |
|
|
#7 | ||||||
|
I know that the PP is the primary question, but a more important question would be the DGJ. When they quit publishing, I made a serious effort to complete my set. I did it through a combination of back issue purchases, buying lots of sometimes 20 to 25 issues and then purchasing the really rare ones at market value for some insane prices. It is cheaper to buy a set complete when available than it is to buy the 5 or 6 really rare ones individually. These go on eBay auctions, when available, for several hundred dollars an issue.
While building instruments, I did the same thing with Fretboard Journal. The 40th edition had just come out and I used them a lot for technical info and historical info through the company reports and artist/builder interviews. One of these issues I purchased sold for $700 at auction. When I stopped and decided to pass them on in order to gain space, the entire set sold for $450. The Double GUn Journal is the same situation. I still own the set and will likely never sell the set. With Fretboard Journal, I could have sold just three of the issues and tripled what I received, but I didn't want the hassle and I wanted it to go to a user, not a reseller who would break it up for profit and throw away 80-90% of it as trash. This is what you need to consider for both DGJ and PP. I think the best solution, as mentioned above, would be to donate things like this to the silent auction and let nature take it's course. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Arthur Shaffer For Your Post: |
|
|
#8 | ||||||
|
Brian Hornacek is the silent auction “creator”. Since he should be retiring in 2-3 years, if everyone sends their items they’d like to donate to him, he will have ample time to sort through them and get everything ready for those write-in auctions.
![]() ![]() Just sayin’
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post: |
|
|
#9 | ||||||
|
The people who attend the PGCA annual meeting probably already own full sets of DGJ. The bidding would not be too competitive. One advantage would be "no packing and shipping". Some of the great stuff we have accumulated over a lifetime is just not worth much on the open market. At eighty years old, I'm not too happy about this.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
|
|
#10 | ||||||
|
Please keep the feed back coming, when these sets are splintered it's near impossible re-create.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
| The Following User Says Thank You to George Davis For Your Post: |
![]() |
|
|