Parker Gun Collectors Association Forum Home


Winchester AA question
 Moderated by: GregSchroeder  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
Mike Franzen
PGCA Member


Joined: Sat Mar 31st, 2007
Location: Alexandria, Kentucky USA
Posts: 194
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 10:33 pm

Quote

Reply
Found some Win AA ammo in Wal-Mart today that is listed as LOW RECOIL, LOW NOISE, TARGET LOAD. The box reads 50% LESS RECOIL AND NOISE.  12 GA, 2 3/4", MIN. DR. EQ., 26 GRAM. A box of these weigh significantly less than than AA LIGHT TARGET LOADS. I'm wondering if anyone knows the pressure rating for these and if they were developed for vintage guns?

Dave Miles
PGCA Member


Joined: Thu Jan 6th, 2005
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1730
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 10:46 pm

Quote

Reply
I don't believe they were developed especially for vintage guns. If I remember correctly they're around 950 fps, but I can't recall the PSI. It's a pretty weak load.

Chuck Bishop
PGCA Member


Joined: Sun Mar 6th, 2005
Location: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania USA
Posts: 332
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 10:52 pm

Quote

Reply
I believe they are rated at 980 fps which is fine for close up shots.  I would have to think the psi would be in the 5000 to 6000 range.  I tried a box of them and there was a lot of unburnt power residue left in the barrels.  I wouldn't try them in real cold weather.



____________________
Chuck Bishop
Jent P Mitchell III
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Sun Apr 3rd, 2005
Location: Stephens City, VA, USA
Posts: 262
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 11:56 pm

Quote

Reply
I have seen these used and even fired a few myself.  In my opinion they are WORTHLESS !  They would not even be any good for making noise on the 4th of July.  They just do not have enough horsepower.  The newer BIODEGRADABLE clay targets are hard enough to break with full power AA and STS loads.  Do not waste your money on these very low power AA loads.  Buy proven good RST ammo for your vintage Parker and shoot with confidence.

Good Shooting To You All,  Jent

Bill Bolyard
PGCA Member


Joined: Fri Oct 26th, 2007
Location: Curran, Michigan USA
Posts: 303
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Sun Apr 19th, 2009 11:58 pm

Quote

Reply
Jent,

Why are you always yelling at us?

Bill

Ed Blake
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Thu Jul 27th, 2006
Location: Manakin, VA.
Posts: 405
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 12:01 am

Quote

Reply
Jent's the only poster I can read without my glasses.

Tom Bria
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Fri Jan 28th, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 526
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 12:23 am

Quote

Reply
Take the attachment for what it's worth.  May or may not be the same 26 gram load.

 

 

Attachment: Winchester_featherlites_sherman_bell_072899.pdf (Downloaded 53 times)

David Hamilton
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Fri Jan 13th, 2006
Location: Warrenton, Virginia USA
Posts: 578
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 01:02 am

Quote

Reply
These Winchester loads are very similar to the B&P Sub-Sound 12 ga loads which are rated at 1100 fps and 26 gr of lead in 7 1/2 shot size. I have used them hunting and clay shooting. They will not reach out to a long shot but hey work just fine for skeet or any fairly close shooting. Just fine! You can shoot them all day without feeling any effect. I am going to give some to Jent for free if he will reduce his font size on this forum. One other advantage for old Parkers these shells are 2 5/8" long. David

Last edited on Mon Apr 20th, 2009 01:03 am by David Hamilton

Jent P Mitchell III
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Sun Apr 3rd, 2005
Location: Stephens City, VA, USA
Posts: 262
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 03:03 pm

Quote

Reply
Hello Guys,  All you have to do is select number 3 in the top left of the POST REPLY box and your print will be this size and easily read by all of us old timers.

What we need to do is eliminate the default setting of number 2 in the POST REPLY box.  Nothing smaller than setting number 3 should be used.  Size 2 is just to hard to see on a computer screen.

Now back to these low power Winchester AA 12 gauge loads.

They use to be called FEATHERLIGHTS or something very similar to that by Winchester.  When shooting these light loads, or any very light load, at the newer BIODEGRADABLE clay targets the light targets loads do not reliably break the BIODEGRADABLE clay targets. 

I have witnessed BIOS being shot from the bottom, think high overheads, or something like SKEET station 8 but 3 or 4 times higher, and you can clearly see the pellets going through the BIOS and the clay target flies on unbroken. 

I was with a young lady at PHSC in WV one day shooting a high slow in coming overhead BIO clay target.  She was shooting a 28 gauge over and under with modern factory loaded 28 gauge target ammo, I have forgotten what size shot was in these shells, and she was HITTING the BIO clay target everytime but only BREAKING the BIO clay target 2 out of 3 times.  The lesson learned here is to bring enough gun and bring suitable ammo. 

Now this leads me to another question of judgement.  Let's say we are at THE SOUTHERN SXS and we are shooting a target that is on it's face or on it's belly and the shooter clearly knocks a bucket of orange paint off of the clay target but no chunck or piece comes off ????  Do we call that a X or a O on the score sheet.  Now everybody remember that some of these shooters are using damascus barreled guns so they are using light loads, what is the fair and right thing to do ???  Everybody knows that a pellet or 2 or 3 pellets had to go through the BIO clay target to blow that orange paint off so how do you score it ???? X or O ???

Good Shooting To You All,  Jent

Ben Yarian
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Fri Jun 30th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 340
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 05:56 pm

Quote

Reply
Jent. you have a piont there.  At the club that I shoot at, I wittnessed a target change direction almost by 90 degrees, but did not break.  We had just got in a new shipment of the bio targets.  We were just shooting for fun and concidered it a hit, but in a contest.....

Ben

David Hamilton
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Fri Jan 13th, 2006
Location: Warrenton, Virginia USA
Posts: 578
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Mon Apr 20th, 2009 06:08 pm

Quote

Reply
Back to Jent rules. We shoot for fun and don't score our shoots except in the case of a contest. Which brings me to the Southern. Knock e'm dead you guys!
David

RICHARD L ANDERSON
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Tue May 31st, 2005
Location: Michigan USA
Posts: 1208
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 12:58 am

Quote

Reply
If no piece come off the target its lost. You can dust em all you want but thats not breaking them.

I still need my glasses to read Jents postings:?.

Joe Bernfeld
Member
 

Joined: Thu Sep 13th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 70
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 01:01 am

Quote

Reply
Mike, I don't know what the pressure is, and no, they were not developed for vintage guns. However, I really like them in my 6 lb., 6 oz. Lebeau Courally and my 6 lb. 7 oz. Garbi on doves and quail. They pattern very well and I don't like a lot of recoil. These loads are very pleasant to shoot and kill doves and quail very dead!

Joe Bernfeld

Mike Franzen
PGCA Member


Joined: Sat Mar 31st, 2007
Location: Alexandria, Kentucky USA
Posts: 194
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 04:24 am

Quote

Reply
HEY JENT, I'M GOING TO TRY THOSE LOADS OUT AND LET YOU KNOW WHAT I THINK :D

Bill Murphy
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Mon Jan 10th, 2005
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 5872
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 01:25 pm

Quote

Reply
Next time I get near a pressure gun, I'm going to test those AA Feathers or whatever they call them.  I have heard them exhibit off sound characteristics in warm weather.  Conversely, I have frozen RST Lites and they all sound good, all of them.  I can't believe that Winchester, or whatever they call themselves, do not test those shells enough to hear what I hear.  I can load good sounding low pressure 7/8 ounce loads at home.  I don't know why they can't do it in a factory. 

Last edited on Tue Apr 21st, 2009 06:32 pm by Bill Murphy

Ed Blake
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Thu Jul 27th, 2006
Location: Manakin, VA.
Posts: 405
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 01:31 pm

Quote

Reply
I have had success with these shells at backyard skeet, but they are not worth what you have to pay for them.  I started my son with them and worked him into "real" ammo gradually. If you shoot with neighbors close by the report is relatively low.  The AAs used to be great hulls to reload, but lately I have had trouble getting the crimps to close on AAs.  Remington hulls, on the other hand, are a far better hull to reload. 

And as far as PSI goes, I called Winchester a couple years ago and asked. They said it was around 6,500 psi.  This load can be duplicated per the Hodgden data.

Last edited on Tue Apr 21st, 2009 01:34 pm by Ed Blake

Mike Franzen
PGCA Member


Joined: Sat Mar 31st, 2007
Location: Alexandria, Kentucky USA
Posts: 194
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 02:06 pm

Quote

Reply
Bill, I'll bring you some this weekend for your pressure test if you want them. I have a box but haven't fired any off. 6500 psi is quite a bit higher than the 5000 psi recipe I reload for my 141 year old hammer gun. I haven't had any trouble breaking targets ... as long as I hit them ... with that load. They sound good too.

Bill Murphy
PGCA Member
 

Joined: Mon Jan 10th, 2005
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 5872
Status:  Offline
 Posted: Tue Apr 21st, 2009 06:35 pm

Quote

Reply
Yup, I would reload also, rather than to buy the Feathers.  If you will bring me one or two, I will try to compare them to other low pressure shells of known pressure.  I don't own the machine, so give me time.


 Current time is 07:29 pm




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez