Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Doubleguns and steel
Unread 12-15-2018, 09:34 PM   #1
Member
Joe Graziano
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 284
Thanks: 10
Thanked 360 Times in 96 Posts

Default Doubleguns and steel

In general, how new does a gun have to be to safely shoot steel shot? Obviously, I would not shoot it in Damascus barrels. But for fluid steel, how does one know if a set of barrels is OK for steel? Would a gun made in the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s be OK? Is there a rule of thumb?
Joe Graziano is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-15-2018, 10:13 PM   #2
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,512
Thanks: 470
Thanked 12,476 Times in 2,238 Posts

Default

Tom Roster designed the shot collars for steel shot cartridges and has published many articles in Shooting Sportsman. There are many factors to be considered including hardness and barrel erosion, choke bridging, and high chamber pressure.

I don’t shoot steel in my old guns because alternatives are so available, but it can be done with the right hand loaded components. Unless a person is willing to study the issue carefully , the better course is to not shoot steel except through chrome lined bores in thick barreled guns.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 12-15-2018, 11:00 PM   #3
Member
6pt-Sika
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
CraigThompson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 710
Thanked 1,083 Times in 556 Posts

Default

I load my own with Bismuth , problem solved ! I have about 500-700 rounds of steel I bought cheap , but I’ve got a Benelli Montefeltro with screw ins I can shoot that stuff in .
CraigThompson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2018, 07:26 AM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,891
Thanks: 18,540
Thanked 17,197 Times in 6,949 Posts

Default

I wonder why anyone would shoot steel at all given the fact that better alternatives are so readily available. Ballistically speaking, steel is inferrior to any of the other non-toxic substitutes for lead. With steel you need to use two shot sizes larger in order to attain the same down range energy and by doing so you lose the density of pattern that you need to kill waterfowl effectively at the distances ducks and geese are often shot.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me,
a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2018, 08:40 AM   #5
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 364
Thanks: 365
Thanked 387 Times in 185 Posts

Default

For a '' rule of thumb''i would use steel in a gun made after the requirement for steel. One that the maker would have known it's user would likely use steel in it. There are to many better alternatives today than steel to even consider it's use in vintage doubles.
Daniel Carter is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2018, 09:14 AM   #6
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 251
Thanked 1,974 Times in 852 Posts

Default

I think the requirement to use non-tox is misplaced. Originally intended to eliminate lead poisoning in areas subject to high volume shooting of lead, (a very small percentage of waterfowl shooting) it required higher cost, less effective shot. A better long term requirement would have been to allow continued use of lead, but to place a tax on "Waterfowl" shot equal to the increased cost of steel shot. The increased revenue would be used to buy and improve waterfowl habitat. (can you say Ducks Unlimited)? Would be a win for everyone, including those of us who like to shoot old guns. Unfortunately, it's too simple and effective solution, so it has no chance of ever being implemented
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2018, 11:42 AM   #7
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,891
Thanks: 18,540
Thanked 17,197 Times in 6,949 Posts

Default

As well, deep water ducks such as sea ducks and the like aren’t as likely to ingest lead shot due to their feeding habits as are those that frequent marshes, shallow ponds and lakes and estuarine habitat.

But lumping all waterfowl hunters into one group is easier for the athorities to maintain control and police them all alike.



.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me,
a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2018, 01:28 PM   #8
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,503
Thanks: 8,556
Thanked 5,883 Times in 2,237 Posts

Default

Michael McIntosh said the chapter on double guns and steel could be real short - don't. For all the reasons above, that is how I see it
Mills Morrison is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mills Morrison For Your Post:
Unread 12-16-2018, 02:00 PM   #9
Member
Setter Man
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 843
Thanked 820 Times in 345 Posts

Default

And here comes the push for non-lead rifle ammo.
Jay Gardner is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-16-2018, 07:53 PM   #10
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,553
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4,421 Times in 2,379 Posts

Default

i have used steel shot in my lc smith long range with modified barrels and it has never hurt it the barrels are armour steel..these were 2 3/4 and 3 inch shells....i also have another set of long range barrels that are full choke for this same gun i will never fire steel shot thru them....charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2019, Parkerguns.org
Copyright 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.