Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-20-2014, 05:41 PM   #11
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,867
Thanks: 1,204
Thanked 4,960 Times in 1,418 Posts

Default

John, if you send me the serial number of your C hammer gun, I'll check the records.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 02-20-2014, 07:17 PM   #12
Member
paul stafford jr
Forum Associate
 
paul stafford jr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 261
Thanks: 130
Thanked 64 Times in 50 Posts

Default

the plating is very old not unlike old colt peace makers from the 1880s
paul stafford jr is offline   Reply With Quote
another nickel plated hammer gun
Unread 02-23-2014, 04:02 PM   #13
Member
Dennis Potter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Default another nickel plated hammer gun

Here are a few pictures of a Parker 12 Gauge Hammer gun I purchased at the Vintage Cup a couple of years ago. It is entirely nickel plated, barrels and all. Even the Butt plate screws are completely plated. The engraving is very sharp; I suspect the gun was plated either when it was built, or soon after. There is substantial wear and corrosion on some parts, like the bottom of the action where it was carried. There is no mention in the Parker records that it was done at the factory, but it certainly was not buffed as the engraving is sharp on done. The only parts not plated are the springs.

If someone can assist in how to post a photo, I can post a few, thanks.
Dennis Potter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2014, 09:54 PM   #14
Member
Dennis Potter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Default

Here are the photos I promised, courtesy Greg Baehman.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0339.jpg (486.8 KB, 18 views)
Dennis Potter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dennis Potter For Your Post:
Unread 02-25-2014, 05:39 PM   #15
Member
David Hamilton
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 289
Thanks: 290
Thanked 75 Times in 56 Posts

Default

Bruce, Your gun looks to be in remarkable condition. As for the checkering, there are variations in checkering than the standard, who knows what Parker would do for special order? David
David Hamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-25-2014, 10:13 PM   #16
Member
Fishtail
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 789
Thanks: 63
Thanked 509 Times in 253 Posts

Default

I know it's fun to think Parker nickel plated these guns, and a lot of people are trying really hard to agree with that, but in the absence of any solid proof....it was done by someone else. When these guns were 5 years old there were nickel plating shops all over the place that could have easily done it at the request of a gunsmith. That's what you are obligated to presume in the absence of any other evidence.
greg conomos is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-25-2014, 11:38 PM   #17
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,862
Thanks: 1,255
Thanked 4,374 Times in 1,314 Posts

Default

Here are a couple pics of a grade 3 lifter, serial #17859. It too has the plating. The mounted hammers are replacements awaiting appropriate engraving. The single hammer is original
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scots 1.JPG (111.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg scots 2.JPG (118.6 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg scots 3.JPG (111.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg scots 4.JPG (165.5 KB, 2 views)
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 02-26-2014, 07:57 AM   #18
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,578
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,518 Times in 4,619 Posts

Default

I agree in some ways Mike. Unless there is factory records or strong evidence to suppor, it has to be assumed that it is not factory. Absolutely no offense to anyone here, but Sometimes it is easy to defend something that is just not correct by saying it is a special order. But then again, sometimes it is. In the absense of proof, one can only acknowledge that it is not normal.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 02-26-2014, 09:28 AM   #19
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

I wonder how much it would cost to send one off today and have it nickel plated.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-26-2014, 11:02 PM   #20
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,862
Thanks: 1,255
Thanked 4,374 Times in 1,314 Posts

Default

I don't believe they left the factory with the plating. If they had I think there would be evidence or mention of it somewhere in the record. My friends gun, which I pictured, is just another unusual Parker with a story lost somewhere in the past. But he loves it and wouldn't part with it.
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.