Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-30-2010, 11:48 AM   #11
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,872 Times in 4,755 Posts

Default

I just noticed THE CHART POSTED ABOVE IS INCORRECT. THESE ARE NOT THE CORRECT PIN SEPARATIONS. The only correct pin separation chart that I know of is on page 527 of The Parker Story.

Last edited by Bill Murphy; 06-30-2010 at 02:01 PM..
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 06-30-2010, 12:09 PM   #12
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 4,375
Thanked 4,048 Times in 1,727 Posts

Default

Robin,I would think that you gave that info to Craig Reynolds who published an updated 1/2 frame article a couple of Parker Pages ago. He used info from Kirby's research and added some additional info and an updated list of known 1/2 frame guns. An outstanding article I might add.

Parker Bros. was the one who first conjured up the idea for the 1/2 frame.I have a copy of the blueprint for the 1/2 frame and if memory serves it was dated 1930. The drawing is in my other computer and not available right now but I posted this drawing here not to long ago and sent some e-copies to interested parties. Maybe someone here has it in their machine an can post it for us all.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 12:30 PM   #13
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,924 Times in 869 Posts

Default

Dave,

You are correct! For a man your age your memory is good!

Craig Reynolds wrote an article for the Winter Parker Pages in 2009, Volume 16, Issue 4, titled "How Many Parker Half Frames?" and the blue print is included too.

I also see that #241,672 is not listed in that article's data. I hope Craig sees this thread and adds it to his data collection.
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 01:34 PM   #14
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,621
Thanked 33,236 Times in 12,377 Posts

Default

Bill, were the barrels on 241672 replaced by Remington?
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 01:44 PM   #15
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,872 Times in 4,755 Posts

Default

Austin, Robin's chart has three errors in pin placement distance. Maybe he would correct them and repost the chart.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 01:45 PM   #16
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,872 Times in 4,755 Posts

Default

Austin, I also find it hard to believe that the #3 frame was made in two different widths. No, I have not seen an eight gauge on a #3 frame. Funny how that set of figures appears on a chart put together by a Remington employee who had probably never seen an eight gauge Parker. The smallest hammerless eight gauge frame I have ever seen is a #6.

Last edited by Bill Murphy; 06-30-2010 at 01:58 PM..
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 01:57 PM   #17
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,924 Times in 869 Posts

Default

Bill,

The chart I posted is a copy of a Remington chart taken from one of their catalogs. I didn't create the chart, its more or less an historical document and nothing I would change, right or wrong. It is what it is.

I simply copied it from an old issue of Parker Pages just as it was copied by Mr. Kirby when he wrote that article. I believe I even listed the issue I took it from.

Please, don't shoot the messenger because its ME!

Robin
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 01:59 PM   #18
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,872 Times in 4,755 Posts

Default

Dean, I replaced the barrels on #241,672 with a set from the old junk box.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-30-2010, 02:00 PM   #19
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,872 Times in 4,755 Posts

Default

Thanks, Robin, I just wanted to make sure that everyone had the correct information. By the way, the 1930 Remington half frame blueprint that Dave mentions is the blueprint that says "Use #1 barrels." Only after Dave sent me a copy of that blueprint did I think to use a set of #1 frame 16 gauge barrels on my half frame DHE which, up to that time, had no barrels at all.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Half Frames
Unread 06-30-2010, 02:09 PM   #20
Member
Austin W Hogan
PGCA Invincible
Life Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 408 Times in 197 Posts

Default Half Frames

I remember a gun that was offered at Las Vegas that was stamped 1/2 on the lug but was a 1 1/2.

Best, Austin
Austin W Hogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.