Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-17-2010, 02:07 PM   #81
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Ouellette View Post
Austin,


A good friend and member of this board made the classic mistake of loading shells with PB instead of the black powder which he thought was in the MEC powder bottle. PB looks like black powder. His barrel blew on the 4th shot. He later had the remainder of those shells tested. They were all far above 20,000 PSI and one was somewhere around 34,000 PSI. After that my friend now keeps all black powder loading equipment in a seperate room from his smokeless loaders and supplies. In life things happen... Then the rumors start which are always much, much worse than the actual event. Oh, my friend's blown gun is pictured in "Shooting Flying" by Murdelack (SP?).

I believe in moderation to preserve and only push to the limit when necessary!

Paul Harm's ruptured Remington is in Ed's book at p. 119 and is accurately reported as the result of a substitution of smokeless for black. Other authors may not be so constrained and may have reported it only as what happens when you put a smokeless powder load in a damascus gun.

Maybe the point I have been trying to make, maybe somewhat inartfully, is that Parker damascus barrels are stout and if a person wants to know what he can shoot in one, detailed information is available and goes far beyond " you have to use low pressure shells and you get them from RST." You don't have to use low pressure loads, and you can buy shells from local sources that meet the Parker load requirements for the gun, if he wants to find out for himself. But I shoot moderate to low pressure loads at clays because I like to be easy on my shoulder and the gun. If a person hears that he can only use low pressure loads, seems to me that he may think that the gun is somehow weak, or inferior, or not as good as others and maybe I'm trying to put that notion to rest.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 09-17-2010, 02:23 PM   #82
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,592
Thanks: 6,159
Thanked 8,870 Times in 4,754 Posts

Default

I think the "low pressure" caveat is in order for those who don't actually measure the wall thickness of their barrels. Some fluid steel barrels come from the factories with wall thickness that would seem to indicate the use of low pressure ammo.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2010, 12:39 AM   #83
Member
TARNATION !!!
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jack Cronkhite's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,806
Thanks: 867
Thanked 2,371 Times in 657 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew Hause View Post
Jack: could you please post an ultra close up of the barrel flats of your BNP GHE and thanks!
Drew: Long day on the road to Montana and back. The only issue with the lifter acquired is some pitting in the bores. The rest of the gun looks pretty nice for 1881. The wood is very good. Action is very tight. The first surprise is it sits on a 1 frame, with those 32" barrels Cyl and Imp Cyl. Should be a sweet pheasant gun. The side plates, under the right light, are still holding some irridescent colors. I'm pretty pleased so far.

Back to the GHE BNP. Here are a couple quick shots. If you need better let me know and I will spend some time with it after getting some sleep.

Cheers,
Jack
Attached Images
File Type: jpg BNP.jpg (423.7 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg bnp2.jpg (318.7 KB, 4 views)
__________________
Hunt ethically. Eat heartily.
Jack Cronkhite is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jack Cronkhite For Your Post:
Unread 09-18-2010, 12:52 AM   #84
Member
TARNATION !!!
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Jack Cronkhite's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,806
Thanks: 867
Thanked 2,371 Times in 657 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin humburg View Post
Jack, I used to take a lot of pictures years back slr under stood it film speed f stop yahda yahda, then they made them into computers I kept shooting the slr (I don't need 1 of thoes goofy cameras) well here I am I want to put pictures on here so I go to wally world to get me one or use my daugthers what are the guidelines to get a good picture the pixles or what ever. Thanks ch
Calvin: Bill pretty much says it all. I agree for computer purposes anything beyond the 3MP is more than needed and everthing out there is way beyond 3MP now anyway. If you mastered the SLR, all the concepts remain the same for a DSLR but you can do a bit more with the camera that might have been done later in the film processing, like enhanced color saturation. I agree fully with Bill, if you have good lenses with your film camera, try to see what you can find that will accept those lenses or see if there is an adapter that could make them fit. If you want control (f stop/shutter/iso/white balance/dof/manual focus etc), you won't want a point and shoot, although there is plenty you can do with them and they are convenient for their ease of carrying anywhere. Looking forward to seeing some pics.
Cheers,
Jack
__________________
Hunt ethically. Eat heartily.
Jack Cronkhite is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jack Cronkhite For Your Post:
Unread 09-18-2010, 07:43 AM   #85
Member
ch
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
calvin humburg's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,816
Thanks: 1,654
Thanked 640 Times in 351 Posts

Default

Don't see what the big deal is. If you are worried about your barrel shoot rst or roll your own. Most of the time when you miss it aint because you didn't have enough power its because the shot string went by the target. killed phesants with dove loads when thats all i had and missed with them as well. I'm sorry I get off subject at times. good day ch oh i shot a lot of black at doves works dandy but clean up sure gets old.
calvin humburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2010, 04:35 PM   #86
Member
Mike Stahle
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 144 Times in 53 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin humburg View Post
Don't see what the big deal is. If you are worried about your barrel shoot rst or roll your own. Most of the time when you miss it aint because you didn't have enough power its because the shot string went by the target. killed phesants with dove loads when thats all i had and missed with them as well. I'm sorry I get off subject at times. good day ch oh i shot a lot of black at doves works dandy but clean up sure gets old.
I don't either "anymore"
Mike Stahle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2010, 05:34 PM   #87
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

My main concern in shooting damascus guns is to keep my head down and follow through.

16ga
Attached Images
File Type: jpg C16Bernard 010.jpg (112.8 KB, 5 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 09-20-2010, 10:31 AM   #88
Member
Mike Stahle
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 144 Times in 53 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Stahle View Post
I did the same this morning, anxious to see what reply I get back.
Hey Federal, still waiting for a reply.
Mike Stahle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-20-2010, 10:33 AM   #89
Member
Mike Stahle
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 310
Thanks: 337
Thanked 144 Times in 53 Posts

Default

Any idea as to pressures of any of these old rounds?

https://docs.google.com/View?id=dfg2hmx7_333g89dwqg8
Mike Stahle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-20-2010, 11:10 AM   #90
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
Thanks: 1,516
Thanked 561 Times in 311 Posts

Default

I have quite a few catalogs from WRA Co., Eley and Kynoch. They date from 1881 to 1928. No pressures are given in any of them. I wonder how they came up with velocities. It would be interesting to see what was used as a 'chronograph' 100+ years ago. Testing pressure was probably done with lead or copper slugs in a special chamber. Even so, where did they come up with the standards. In other words, .xxx" squish equates to x,xxx LUP or CUP. Mike and Calvin, I agree with you. I don't handload shotshells (yet), but use Polywads in my non-fluid steel barrels. It does not take but 4 or 5 pounds of energy per pellet for taking a Ruffed Grouse. Cheers!
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Landskov For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.