Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-03-2012, 08:34 PM   #11
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 4,375
Thanked 4,047 Times in 1,727 Posts

Default

Frank, Thank You for posting the pictures. I would be pretty happy also...
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 09:29 PM   #12
Member
Pittypatdugan
PGCA Member
 
Pat Dugan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Thanks: 15
Thanked 169 Times in 97 Posts

Default

I will post more tomorrow, gun at office
Pat Dugan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 11:07 PM   #13
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,559
Thanks: 35,433
Thanked 33,040 Times in 12,321 Posts

Default

I've gotta say I'm pretty impressed.

Please let us know how the POI on each tube compares with your expectations.
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 02:04 AM   #14
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default

Forend gap? c'mon guys, the forend to barrel gap has to either get larger or the barrels are so thick walled with a .410 internal and the same as the 28g outside. That would be rediculous. Why is this even a question? It's gonna be .550 minus .410, divided by 2 difference.
Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 11:08 AM   #15
Member
Joe Bernfeld
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 297
Thanks: 24
Thanked 76 Times in 43 Posts

Default

Agreed, but I'd still like to see a pic. I was interested in a set, years ago when CSM advertised them, but refrained when I couldn't get them to send pics. Lots of $ for a possible unsightly gap between the bbls and forend. I will say that they look nice in the pics Pat posted though.
Joe Bernfeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 05:38 PM   #16
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,236
Thanks: 1,142
Thanked 3,603 Times in 984 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Heald View Post
Forend gap? c'mon guys, the forend to barrel gap has to either get larger or the barrels are so thick walled with a .410 internal and the same as the 28g outside. That would be rediculous. Why is this even a question? It's gonna be .550 minus .410, divided by 2 difference.
Gosh, I thought there was no such thing as dumb question here.

I only asked the question because I thought it may be of interest to others that have ordered a set or those that just simply have an interest in these sorts of things. I am truly sorry if it offended you, Chuck.
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 05:50 PM   #17
Member
Pittypatdugan
PGCA Member
 
Pat Dugan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Thanks: 15
Thanked 169 Times in 97 Posts

Default

More Pictures, some people will not believe the quality, but the way I look at it, Connecticut Shotgun make the $49,000 Parker 28 gauge on the same machines, there is no shortcut to Quality in these barrels.


PDD
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2012-01-04 16.20.23.jpg (492.9 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 2012-01-04 16.21.40.jpg (541.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 2012-01-04 16.24.08.jpg (510.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 2012-01-04 16.25.58.jpg (495.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg 2012-01-04 16.26.56.jpg (510.0 KB, 1 views)
Pat Dugan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pat Dugan For Your Post:
Unread 01-04-2012, 05:51 PM   #18
Member
Joe Bernfeld
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 297
Thanks: 24
Thanked 76 Times in 43 Posts

Default

I think Chuck has a set on order, but the topic of forend fit makes him a bit touchy, no? Until he sees them. Maybe...
Joe Bernfeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 06:00 PM   #19
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Baehman View Post
Gosh, I thought there was no such thing as dumb question here.

I only asked the question because I thought it may be of interest to others that have ordered a set or those that just simply have an interest in these sorts of things. I am truly sorry if it offended you, Chuck.
Greg,
I got carried away. I had seen this concern stated many times in the past when the barrels were first offered. I even saw where Lou got a little coy about it. Sorry, you're right.
Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 06:06 PM   #20
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Bernfeld View Post
I think Chuck has a set on order, but the topic of forend fit makes him a bit touchy, no? Until he sees them. Maybe...
That and my new pointer war painted herself up with turds the other day just like Amarillo Mike's dogs. I gotta talk to Mike about that. I think some of those 'across the tracks Britts' have taught my pointer some low class stuff.

Heck Joe, that forend was a real find, but it weren't cheap neither. I think I may have the only one in existance.
Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.