|
02-01-2019, 11:07 AM | #43 | ||||||
|
My friend Dave and I keep going back and forth on the correct nomenclature for the Ithaca NID 10-gauge with serial numbers in the 4xx,xxx series. He insists on using Super-Ten (bold emphasis as in Dave's first post here) whereas Ithaca's own literature repeatedly refers to the model as the Super 10 and that's what I've used in various writings.
Perhaps this is a good opportunity for Dave to tell us why he believes the correct name is the one he uses? PS: this is my own pic, not copied from Dave's post. |
||||||
02-01-2019, 11:25 AM | #44 | ||||||
|
Seconded as "Super 10" by Walt Snyder, the Ithaca Gun Co Historian.
Here's a partial copy of a factory letter on a certain Super 10. |
||||||
02-01-2019, 12:28 PM | #45 | ||||||
|
It appears you guys have got me on that. Best excuse I can give is that I picked up "Super Ten" and "Magnum Ten" from Elmer's article in the September 1935, The American Rifleman, on his first year's experience with #500000. I shall work to mend the error of my ways.
|
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
02-01-2019, 05:57 PM | #46 | ||||||
|
Egads
|
||||||
02-02-2019, 08:19 AM | #47 | ||||||
|
You are forgiven Dave.
__________________
Wag more- Bark less. |
||||||
|
|