|
09-22-2013, 03:04 PM | #23 | ||||||
|
Matt, I often use Winchester AA Low Recoil, Low Noise for my Parker 12 gauges. The Parker's lock up will handle heavy loads, but these are gentle on the wood. Only about 960 fps but plenty for most clays or grouse. Unfortunately in Canada we don't have the selection of shells for vintage guns they have in the U.S.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bob Brown For Your Post: |
09-22-2013, 05:17 PM | #24 | ||||||
|
Thanks bob I will need to have a look and see if I can find those. I am curious if perhaps there is a buckshot load available that would be safe in this old beauty. Or perhaps I should be wary of a certain dram equivalent ?
|
||||||
09-25-2013, 08:19 PM | #25 | ||||||
|
Beware game loads and buckshot in full and full barrels will definitely put a strain on the gun! I would stay away from such a load. David
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to David Hamilton For Your Post: |
09-25-2013, 08:45 PM | #26 | ||||||
|
You should be able to find the Winchester AA LR,LN in any of the larger sports stores. In southern Alberta I expect that Wholesale Sports or Bass Pro Shop in Calgary would have them. I've had an on and off urge to rattle up and take a nice whitetail buck with a Parker for a few years. No luck so far, but I've found the Remington managed recoil slugs to be fairly gentle. Nothing exciting about the ballistics compared to the smoking slugs that are out there, but 1200 fps and a 1 oz slug will work for as far as I would try to shoot without sights. I had to try several of my Parkers before I found one that shot them relatively accurately with both barrels fairly well regulated. They're made to work with full chokes and your 4/4 weight 2 frame barrels are fairly stout. My only concern would be how well the stock head is inletted. It looks like a replacement and glass bedding it to the receiver might be a good idea.
I just re-read your post, Matt. For some reason I read slugs rather than buckshot. I don't know about buckshot loads, but if there are some that are low/managed recoil I expect they would be fine. |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bob Brown For Your Post: |
09-26-2013, 06:41 PM | #27 | ||||||
|
Boy isn't that the truth...I'm terminal
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Rich Anderson For Your Post: |
09-26-2013, 10:08 PM | #28 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Russ Jackson For Your Post: |
09-26-2013, 11:38 PM | #29 | ||||||
|
Thanks for all the input guys. Love the folks here very helpful. Just waiting for my membership to kick in lol then I'll have to order a letter on this old girl.
|
||||||
10-01-2013, 09:17 PM | #30 | ||||||
|
Yes, buttstock is a replacement. Forend is original.
That buttstock could possibly be worked over some to make it more correct looking. But hard to tell for sure from the photos. You stole the gun at $200. But then again, the Canadian dollar is worth More than ours is now.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post: |
Tags |
lucky |
|
|