Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions General Discussions about Other Fine Doubles

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-29-2015, 08:43 AM   #11
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

The original set has been cut to 22 3/4" and the add on are 28".
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wayne goerres For Your Post:
Unread 08-29-2015, 10:10 AM   #12
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Wink

Here are some additional photo's. I am not much of a photographer so these are as good as it gets.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 001.jpg (500.8 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 002.jpg (512.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 004.jpg (411.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 011.jpg (419.2 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 007.jpg (385.2 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 008.jpg (339.4 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 015.jpg (358.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 016.jpg (455.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 019.jpg (490.8 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 017.jpg (500.1 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg Pawn shop fox no 2 005.jpg (385.9 KB, 1 views)
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wayne goerres For Your Post:
Unread 08-30-2015, 09:59 AM   #13
Member
tom tutwiler
Forum Associate
 
tom tutwiler's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 676
Thanks: 398
Thanked 743 Times in 223 Posts

Default

Interesting. Both foreends appear to be Sterlingworth foreends because of the checkering pattern and also because the foreend escutcheon is engraved as a Sterlingworth escutcheon. Does the ejector foreend have the same serial number as the frame? PS. I love a bit of a mystery.
tom tutwiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-30-2015, 01:12 PM   #14
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,610
Thanks: 1,639
Thanked 7,844 Times in 2,364 Posts

Default

The early style snap-on/-off forearms on A-/AE-Grades had the same checkering pattern as Sterlingworth forearms. My A-Grade 20-gauge 200158 --



But that escutchin shown does appear to have Sterlingworth engraving.

My 1936 vintage Savage-era A-Grade 16-gauge got a quite similar piece of wood --

Dave Noreen is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 08-30-2015, 02:03 PM   #15
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

The gun has all matching no's.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-30-2015, 04:06 PM   #16
Member
tom tutwiler
Forum Associate
 
tom tutwiler's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 676
Thanks: 398
Thanked 743 Times in 223 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Noreen View Post
The early style snap-on/-off forearms on A-/AE-Grades had the same checkering pattern as Sterlingworth forearms. My A-Grade 20-gauge 200158 --



But that escutchin shown does appear to have Sterlingworth engraving.

My 1936 vintage Savage-era A-Grade 16-gauge got a quite similar piece of wood --

My brain is getting old. I have an early A grade 16 gauge with snap on forearm and it does indeed have the same checkering as the Sterlingworths. I hate mental cramps.
tom tutwiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-30-2015, 05:50 PM   #17
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

Dose anyone know what the standard chamber length on one of these is. I think I will try some dove hunting with this one.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-30-2015, 05:58 PM   #18
Member
tom tutwiler
Forum Associate
 
tom tutwiler's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 676
Thanks: 398
Thanked 743 Times in 223 Posts

Default

Should be 2 1/2" since both barrels were made in Philly.
tom tutwiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2015, 10:48 AM   #19
Member
TOOL MAN
PGCA Member
 
Steve Cambria's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 621
Thanks: 983
Thanked 1,922 Times in 421 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom tutwiler View Post
Does the ejector foreend have the same serial number as the frame? PS. I love a bit of a mystery.
Twisted Fox minds often think alike, Tom.

Wayne--Just out of curiosity, was the 1915 ship date stated on a factory card/letter? Great snag BTW!
__________________
"On the whole, I'd rather be in Philadelphia...."
Steve Cambria is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2015, 01:27 PM   #20
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,610
Thanks: 1,639
Thanked 7,844 Times in 2,364 Posts

Default

Quote:
Does anyone know what the standard chamber length on one of these is.
They most likely left North 18th Street and Windrim Avenue with chambers 2 3/8 inch long intended for the 2 1/2 inch 20-gauge paper shells. The only two A.H. Fox Gun Co. catalogues that I've seen that mention chamber lengths are the 1913 and 1914 --

Dave Noreen is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.