Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-11-2012, 11:30 AM   #21
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Xxxxxxxxx
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
read what i typed
Unread 04-11-2012, 11:45 AM   #22
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 2,039
Thanked 2,291 Times in 861 Posts

Default read what i typed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Day View Post
George , why don't you just follow the Parker service load tables in TPS? That's why they are published there. I've reproduced them serveral time here and regularly show them to others at our Parker exhibitions. They are appropriate for both fluid and damascus steel barrels.
Also and imho if an STS 1 oz or 1 1/8 oz load at 1150 fps is too much pressure for your gun then you shouldn't be shooting the gun. I am not aware of any 12 ga Parker that was not designed to shoot such a load.
As always reference to the Parker tables is best and preferable to opinions of others. Go to the source.
Bruce
What in tarnation are you talking about? I didn't say the STS loads are too much for any gun i own. Where is that in my post? I went to STS specifically for the short hulls. Please explain what you are thinking in critiquing my post.
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2012, 11:48 AM   #23
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Oh no!!! Two lawyers in "discusssion"!
__________________
Don't hunt with a gun that will embarrass your dog!

USMC Retired
USMC Distinguished Marksman
USMC Distinguished Pistol Shot
NRA Benefactor - Ring of Freedom member
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Unread 04-11-2012, 12:00 PM   #24
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Sorry I must be stupid. I meant Chris, not George. I deleted the post and will avoid responses to people I don't know in the future.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 04-11-2012, 12:26 PM   #25
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,594
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,874 Times in 4,756 Posts

Default

John D., your new anti-delete program finally paid for itself. It worked on the fellow it was intended to work for, Checkbook Bruce. He got caught in his own trap. OOPS, Bruce has succeeded in deleting his post, and as always, confusing the sense of the thread. Congratulations again, Bruce. Your affair with some of the other checkwriters is confusing to the rest of us. What is the attraction? Of course, you are always welcome at the Murphy house, in case I am missing something.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Unread 04-11-2012, 02:23 PM   #26
Member
Leighton Stallones
Forum Associate
 
Leighton Stallones's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 197
Thanks: 0
Thanked 70 Times in 34 Posts

Default

I think the 1 1/8 is too much recoil for the gun and the shooter. I use both 7/8 and 1 oz at 1150-1180 and they break targets just as well as the heavier loads.
Most everyone that I know now use 1 oz as they pattern better and are as/or more effective than the 1 1/8.
Leighton Stallones is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Leighton Stallones For Your Post:
Unread 04-11-2012, 06:46 PM   #27
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,594
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,874 Times in 4,756 Posts

Default

LS, you are so right. There are now two companies making 3/4 ounce wads for 12 gauge shells. When I get low on my Federal SO wads which are the wads to use for 7/8 and 1 ounce loads, I will buy a case of the 3/4 ounce wads. If you don't shoot for money, and/or shoot very tight choked guns, 3/4 ounce loads are more than enough.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2012, 07:07 PM   #28
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Chris called and we discussed what Parker stated and where the references are. Again I apologize to Mr Purtil for mistakingly directing my response to him instead of Chris. It won't happen again.

And with Mr Murphy, again I have no idea what he is talking about with some kind of a fictional "no delete" program. As for the name he calls me "Checkbook Bruce", if he is implying that I have paid fair market value for most of my Parkers, with the exception of two that I was given, yes that's what I have done. I've not taken advantage of anybody and I am fortunate to have friends who have offered me guns at reasonable values as I have done in turn to others. I don't see what's wrong with that, but I am looking at the world through my eyes. Out of all the Parkers I have acquired, only one has been on the open market. All others have come through friends and word of mouth. I doubt there are more than a few close friends who know what I have paid for any gun, and I sincerely doubt they have talked. I realize that some people get some sort of self verification or build themselves up in status if they can get something of value for almost nothing , to take advantage of somebody else, somebody who is foolish, or uneducated, or a widow soon after the death of her husband, or somebody down on their luck and desperate for cash. If by the nickname given me "Checkbook Bruce" it means that I don't do that, well I suppose I'll answer to that. Yes, I have a checkbook and have used it in the past to acquire a few nice guns at fair value.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 04-11-2012, 07:39 PM   #29
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,300
Thanks: 464
Thanked 3,615 Times in 1,557 Posts

Default

"if you do the math, you cannot reload 12 guage as cheap as you can buy them"
My MBA thinks differently than your CPA. I'm loading for about $4.10, and can't find shells (even at Wally World) for less that about $6 out the door (and my reloads are better quality than promo loads).
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-11-2012, 08:23 PM   #30
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 4,375
Thanked 4,048 Times in 1,727 Posts

Default

I agree John. I'm right about $4.00 a box for 12 gauge and as the gauge get's smaller the savings goes up. Right now my 28 gauge reloads are cheaper than 12's.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.