Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-27-2013, 05:49 PM   #191
Member
DeAn Durham
Forum Associate
 
Dee Durham's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 129
Thanked 158 Times in 41 Posts

Default

Looks like it! There are several screws and bolts that are not stock. I still find myself in awe looking at it just thinking to myself "WOW!".....no words really, just wow!
Dee Durham is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-27-2013, 05:54 PM   #192
Member
DeAn Durham
Forum Associate
 
Dee Durham's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 129
Thanked 158 Times in 41 Posts

Default

Last 3 pictures I have:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Parker 024.jpg (503.2 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Parker 017.jpg (528.2 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg Parker 019.jpg (516.1 KB, 1 views)
Dee Durham is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dee Durham For Your Post:
Unread 05-27-2013, 07:09 PM   #193
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime Member
Since 3rd Grade
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,315
Thanks: 14,215
Thanked 12,345 Times in 4,421 Posts

Default

There is still some shine to the metal in that first picture. The gun has had a tough life but may have more life in it than you think
Mills Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mills Morrison For Your Post:
Unread 05-27-2013, 07:27 PM   #194
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

I bet it's got some shooting life left in it once you cleaned and tightened it up and put another bolt in the floorplate!
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard Flanders For Your Post:
Unread 05-27-2013, 10:15 PM   #195
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,621
Thanked 33,239 Times in 12,378 Posts

Default

Hi Dee! It's good to see you back on the forum. These are some pictures we haven't seen before and I'm in complete agreement with you.... WOW!!

Have you ever sent for a PGCA research letter on your Parker?
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 05-27-2013, 10:20 PM   #196
Member
Dennis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 666
Thanks: 48
Thanked 418 Times in 202 Posts

Default

Dee,
I think you should look into having it restored or at least replace the screws and put it back into firing condition. That gun is just too beautiful under the rust and grime to let it sit around doing nothing. It needs to be put back to work. Good luck with whatever you decide. Please keep us informed.

Dennis
Dennis V. Nix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dennis V. Nix For Your Post:
Unread 05-27-2013, 10:34 PM   #197
Member
Dunnigun
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 213
Thanks: 80
Thanked 146 Times in 41 Posts

Default

Love the bolts. Classic.
Brian Stucker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Stucker For Your Post:
Unread 05-28-2013, 07:23 AM   #198
Member
DeAn Durham
Forum Associate
 
Dee Durham's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 129
Thanked 158 Times in 41 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Hi Dee! It's good to see you back on the forum. These are some pictures we haven't seen before and I'm in complete agreement with you.... WOW!!

Have you ever sent for a PGCA research letter on your Parker?
Yes sir I have...I will post a picture of it when I get into the office this morning for you guys. And I took these pictures this weekend while I had it out and just wanted to share it with everyone here. Seems every time I look at it, I see something different and intriguing so I started snapping photos.

It does still have some shine to it yes....just the lighting and my phone doesn't show it sometimes in the pictures. I've ran my finger around inside the barrel and to me it's as smooth as a baby butt but I have no idea what I'm looking for etc...lol
Dee Durham is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-28-2013, 09:16 AM   #199
Member
Mills
PGCA Lifetime Member
Since 3rd Grade
 
Mills Morrison's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,315
Thanks: 14,215
Thanked 12,345 Times in 4,421 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennis V. Nix View Post
Dee,
I think you should look into having it restored or at least replace the screws and put it back into firing condition. That gun is just too beautiful under the rust and grime to let it sit around doing nothing. It needs to be put back to work. Good luck with whatever you decide. Please keep us informed.

Dennis


Second Dennis on that.
Mills Morrison is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mills Morrison For Your Post:
Unread 05-28-2013, 09:30 AM   #200
Member
DeAn Durham
Forum Associate
 
Dee Durham's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 121
Thanks: 129
Thanked 158 Times in 41 Posts

Default

Here's the letter:


March 27, 2011



DeAn Durham
521 Harmon Road
Hurst, TX 76053

Hello Ms. Durham:

Parker shotgun, serial number 126696, was ordered by J. M. Parisot in Palmetto Home, MS on April 8, 1904 and shipped on July 27, 1904. According to Parker Bros. Order Book No. 62 it was a CHE hammerless, 16-gauge. It featured Titanic steel barrels with a length of 28 inches. Its stock configuration was a capped pistol grip. The chokes were patterned RH full (185 # 7 pellets in a 30” circle at 40 yards) and LH full (185 # 7 pellets in a 30” circle at 40 yards). According to Parker Bros. Stock Book No. 45, its specifications were: Length of Pull: 14”, Drop at Heel: 3 ¼”, Weight: 6 pounds and 10 ounces. The price was $150.00 plus $25.00 for ejectors.

According to Order Book No. 63, the gun was returned on August 19, 1904 by J. M. Parisot to repair ext rib and frame. There was no charge.

Parker Bros., Remington Arms Company Inc. and others repaired and reconfigured guns as a major part of the gun trade. Over the years, this Parker may have undergone changes to suit its owners, either at the factory or other competent facility. Complete factory return and repair records do not exist therefore our research team cannot comment, report, or have any responsibility for work performed. It is important to note that those Parker records remaining are hand written and show considerable fading from their age. The research committee has done its best to interpret and report our findings in answer to this request and assumes no responsibility for the recorded accuracy or other work completed.

Sincerely,



Mark Conrad, Research Committee Chairman
The Parker Gun Collectors Association Inc.
P. O. Box 5772 Va. Beach, VA 23471-5772
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Parker Letter.pdf (329.8 KB, 8 views)
Dee Durham is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.