|
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage! | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
05-11-2018, 05:34 PM
|
#43 | ||||||
|
Reading through the posts in detail, I learned that the gun is a repro. No matter, Brian made it look like a real Parker. When the first repro’s starting coming out a few folks were touting them as better than the originals. True they use more modern steel but the gun was lacking in the checkering and stock finish areas, in my opinion.
When I bought mine, the first thing I did was to make it look more Parker. I struck the Winchester logo on the barrels and redid them. Then I went to work on the stock finish which is harder than hell to remove. It is one tough finish. I wanted a traditional oil and varnish finish. After that was completed I went to work on the checkering which is abysmal on all the DHE repros I’ve seen. Cross overs, lines deeper than others and no mullered border. I fixed that but eventually sold the gun because it wasn’t a real Parker to me. They are undoubtedly nice guns with great wood on most. I can understand why many like them and use them. But I am a total traditionalist and so the repro wasn’t right for me personally. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 04:45 AM
|
#44 | ||||||
|
I agree with Tom. Repros are nice guns, for what they are, but I don't think they are worth making them look old. Same thing with the A1 Special upgrades. While i am in awe of folks like Geoffrey G, to me it's like asking Michelangelo to repaint a '53 Chevy.
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am" |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 07:04 AM
|
#45 | ||||||
|
Hey... what is wrong with a ‘53?
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 07:58 AM
|
#46 | ||||||
|
Yeah, with that fire-breathing 6 holes. BTW, I edited my original post to include Brian next to Geoffrey, but somehow the edit apparently didn't take
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am" |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 09:14 AM
|
#47 | ||||||
|
Coming onto a guys thread to basically say, "nice try" strikes incredibly distasteful to me. JMO
Is a Remington era Parker a "real" Parker? |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Scot Cardillo For Your Post: |
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 12:37 PM
|
#48 | ||||||
|
Scott, not sure what you are saying in your comment. If I have offended anyone with my repro comments, it was unintentional. I think Kirk’s gun and the work Brian did on it is stunning. The wood on that gun is better than most original DHE’s. Anyone would be proud to own that gun. Everyone has their personal preferences. I was just stating mine, although in retrospect, I shouldn’t have done that in a thread about Kirks gun.
Remington Parkers are real Parkers for sure. Some of the Meridan people worked on them. I also like upgrades with the engraving done by Runge. Although I think the cyanide case hardening is lacking. If I owned one of those guns I would have the colors re-done. So its all just a matter of personal preferences. I am in awe of the manufacturing period in which Parker guns were done. It’s a taste of pure Americana that is not lost on me and so I prefer guns that were made in that period. It’s that simple and doesn’t diminish the worth of more modern guns. |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post: |
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 01:45 PM
|
#49 | ||||||
|
Take it from me, the cyanide colors on a 16 that Delgrego refinished wore off. Im having Bachelders re case it with bone charcoal.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-12-2018, 03:04 PM
|
#50 | ||||||
|
The only thing wrong with a '53 chev is that it isn't a '55 or '56.... you're welcome!
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
