Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Restoration

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Safe Wall Thickness
Unread 09-23-2014, 07:56 PM   #1
Member
Bruce A Lyons
PGCA Member
 
bruce a lyons's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 310
Thanks: 552
Thanked 304 Times in 79 Posts

Default Safe Wall Thickness

About what would be considered a safe wall thickness? Am considering a 16 guage damascus double but wall thickness at muzzle is .022-.025. Is it safe? Thanks
bruce a lyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-23-2014, 09:11 PM   #2
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,808
Thanks: 1,646
Thanked 8,157 Times in 3,260 Posts

Default

start here

http://parkerguns.org/pages/faq/BarrelThickness.htm


BUT- there is a lot more to a barrel the the muzzle, pressure peaks in the few inches after the chamber, it would be at its least at the muzzle
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 09-23-2014, 09:15 PM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,634
Thanks: 35,603
Thanked 33,228 Times in 12,374 Posts

Default

If you're measuring barrel wall thickness at the muzzle you are measuring choke constriction too. This is a false reading as far as safe barrel wall thickness is concerned.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 09-23-2014, 09:36 PM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,536 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

Wall thickness at the muzzle means little. You need measurements farther back.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 09-24-2014, 12:22 AM   #5
Member
Steve Havener
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 168
Thanks: 1
Thanked 68 Times in 56 Posts

Default

Wall thickness should be measured from the breach. Some recommend measuring at 6 inch intervals starting 9 inches from the breach. If I remember correctly the British proof houses will reject any barrels with a thickness less than .025 inches.
Steve Havener is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Steve Havener For Your Post:
Unread 09-24-2014, 06:52 AM   #6
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,634
Thanks: 35,603
Thanked 33,228 Times in 12,374 Posts

Default

Probably the most critical point of wall thickness is where the chamber ends and the forcing cone begins. For instance if a gun was ordered to be 'light as can' or 'light as possible' it would have been built on the smallest frame for the gauge (16 on the 0-frame, 12 on the 1-frame, 10 on the 2-frame) and the barrel filer would have brought the barrels to the minimum. Now, if someone today considers lengthening the chambers.... he better think again.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 09-24-2014, 08:55 AM   #7
Member
Steve Havener
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 168
Thanks: 1
Thanked 68 Times in 56 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Probably the most critical point of wall thickness is where the chamber ends and the forcing cone begins.
Dean makes a very good point. Today with very good short shells as close as your front door there is no reason to lengthen chambers. If you want to reload getting started is relatively inexpensive. A MEC Super Sizer to resize with, a Lee Load All to de-prime and set primer, drop powder, set wad and drop shot, a beam scale to check powder and shot weight and an antique roll crimp tool to close the shell. All can be picked up reasonably on e-bay.

Load data is not a problem because any load that will fit in a 2 3/4 inch folded crimp shell will fit in a 2 5/8 12 gage shell or 2 9/16th 16 gauge shell with the added advantage of getting the same performance with less chamber pressure using a roll crimp
Steve Havener is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Havener For Your Post:
Unread 09-24-2014, 09:06 AM   #8
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,536 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

I always check thickness at front of chambers. At the forend loop. And look for minimum overall in the front part of the tubes. At the very least.

If I am checking and documenting in detail, I check every 4" at top, bottom and side of each tube.

I thought I recall British proof info to be .018" for minimum. ?

I like to see numbers of at least around .025" minimum in the from half. Around .050" to .060" at the forend loop, and I find that most sound barrels run .090" to .100" in front of the forcing cones. These numbers are just ranges that I have found from measuring and firing different barrel sets.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 09-24-2014, 10:55 AM   #9
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,614 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Some of the lightweight British guns were made with thin barrels, around .020 to .022.

Most Parker 12's had original minimum wall thickness from .028 to .040, depending upon desired weight for the gun. In Parker 20's .022 can be original, although most range from .025 to .030.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 09-24-2014, 11:29 AM   #10
Member
King Cobb
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bill Holcombe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 724
Thanked 1,521 Times in 405 Posts

Default

from a very lengthy previous discussion on this forum:

"The Field March 7, 1891 Vol 77:325
http://books.google.com/books?id=inQ...=0#PPA9-IA6,M1



UK Working Standards recomended minimum wall thickness measured 18" from the barrel breech from Double Gun Classics p. 56, Vol. 1, No. 4 Jan-Feb, 2006:
2 1/2" 12g- .028
2 3/4" 12g- .032
Re-proof recomended minimum- .024

The Hunter's Encyclopedia from the German proof house: minimal wall thickness at end of chamber, regardless of length, for 12, 16 & 20 gauge guns should be 2.3mm (.0906") for 'ordinary good steel' or 2.1mm (.0827") if a 'Special Steel' was used. For the 24 & 28 gauges, due to their higher pressures, 2.4mm (.0945") was recommended.
Minimal wall of .6mm (.0236") was recomended in the "forward third" of the barrel. "

Can be found:

http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...wall+thickness

also there is another thread where the gentleman who owns vintage firearms Jay, I believe most of what he posted there is in the faq though.

http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...?t=7889&page=2
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham
Bill Holcombe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bill Holcombe For Your Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.