Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 10-19-2016, 12:58 PM   #11
Member
Garth Gustafson
PGCA Member
 
Garth Gustafson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 600
Thanks: 1,706
Thanked 1,352 Times in 373 Posts

Default

I only have 2 Parkers and neither one has relief cuts on the extractors. 1897 GH and 1917 VH
Garth Gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-19-2016, 01:06 PM   #12
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,659
Thanks: 35,697
Thanked 33,288 Times in 12,390 Posts

Default

I put a little more thought into it Garth, and if the gun wouldn't open fully because the extractor became hung up on the tips of the firing pins (tumbler tips) forcing it to open could cause such chips. I've had certain Parkers that experienced this very situation.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-19-2016, 01:59 PM   #13
Member
J. A. EARLY
PGCA Member
 
Jerry Harlow's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,960
Thanks: 3,998
Thanked 2,695 Times in 872 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garth Gustafson View Post
Thanks John, the pin tips look nice, rounded and straight, no jagged edges. I'll look for a small rattail file and attempt some careful filing on the extractor damage
It is not damage in my belief; rather it was done at the factory. Notice how uniform the cuts are. The fitter made those cuts at the factory to clear the extractors. They are perfect cuts. That is why the hammer pins are not butchered, which they would have been from constant dragging on the extractor. No need to file.
Jerry Harlow is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jerry Harlow For Your Post:
Unread 10-19-2016, 02:05 PM   #14
Member
Garth Gustafson
PGCA Member
 
Garth Gustafson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 600
Thanks: 1,706
Thanked 1,352 Times in 373 Posts

Default

Thanks Dean, I just fired some snap caps and opened the gun to see if the pins were hanging on the extractor. The tumblers did their job and retracted the firing pins all the way back into the frame so there is no contact with the extractor and all appears normal.

Right after I got this gun Brian Dudley did an ultrasonic cleaning and I wonder if that cleaning resolved the problem of the pins not retracting back into the frame. This restocked 16ga O frame is a wonderful little gun and the only work I'm planning to have done is to have the damascus barrels refinished.
Garth Gustafson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Garth Gustafson For Your Post:
Unread 10-19-2016, 03:05 PM   #15
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,593
Thanks: 483
Thanked 17,635 Times in 4,628 Posts

Default

The extractor cleanse cuts are something that are a hold over from the hammer guns and early hammerless guns.

The first hammerless guns did not have rebounding hammers. Along with some other things inside the action, they also put these small cleanse cuts in the extractor to make sure that it would clear the pins when opening.

After rebounding hammers were implemented in the hammerless guns, the extractor guns remained for some years. Garth, your later guns do not have them due to this. They were phased out in the early 1890s.

I have a PP article in the works that deals with this very topic in detail.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 10-20-2016, 12:01 PM   #16
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

And here I thought only the 1873 Remington hammer lifter gun was made without rebounding hammers. The 75 model had rebounding hammers. I've owned a number of Parker Lifters, and they all had rebounding hammers. It's easy to see they aren't chips, but put in when the gun was made. I would think in case the firing pins were stuck the gun would open without damage to the pins. Good idea.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post:
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.