Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
50 Yard 2 3/4" Non-Tox Load?
Unread 03-13-2011, 10:20 PM   #1
Member
Theodore LeDurt
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 89
Thanks: 1
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts

Default 50 Yard 2 3/4" Non-Tox Load?

Just getting set up and have to admit the expensive ITX verse the even more expensive Nice Shot is confusing me. Which type of shots would allow for better down wind kills?

Getting all these components lined up is bit over welming. Sure would have been a lot easier if the original Bismuth company had gone ahead with their plans for $11 per pound shot cost, and I could have let finances dictate my choice.
__________________
Fox Island Chesapeake Kennels
Home of AKC Dual Award Winner
CH Anubis Treasured Bettis MH
Theodore LeDurt is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 06:55 AM   #2
Member
ch
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
calvin humburg's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,816
Thanks: 1,654
Thanked 640 Times in 351 Posts

Default

Theodore, Think i'm going to try Nice-shot in bb seems people on the fourm like it. I think you use same data but will have to find out for sure before I roll some up. best ch
calvin humburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 07:17 PM   #3
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

One needs to add 1500 PSI to their load pressure due to the hardness of Nice Shot.

This information is listed on their website.
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Ouellette For Your Post:
Unread 03-14-2011, 07:32 PM   #4
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,319
Thanks: 470
Thanked 3,657 Times in 1,567 Posts

Default

Why does hardness change PSI?
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 07:45 PM   #5
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Soft shot compresses providing some "give" to the expanding gas.

Hard shot does not yield to the pressure. It provides more resistance causing pressure to rise faster and higher.

Picture a wad stuck in your barrel. Shoot and blow up the barrel because the extra wad provides more resistance to the expanding gas.
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 07:48 PM   #6
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,319
Thanks: 470
Thanked 3,657 Times in 1,567 Posts

Default

I dunno. With today's shotcups, I wonder how much distortion actually occurs. How out of round is reclaimed shot?
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 07:55 PM   #7
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

Why do I waste my time?

If you do not believe me then please disregard my posts.
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 07:58 PM   #8
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,319
Thanks: 470
Thanked 3,657 Times in 1,567 Posts

Default

Sorry. All I've seen so far is an opinion, not data
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-14-2011, 08:02 PM   #9
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

"One needs to add 1500 PSI to their load pressure due to the hardness of Nice Shot.

This information is listed on their website."

This was my first post in this thread. If you check the Nice Shot website you will find the pressure warning.

Also, Greener wrote of these concepts long before 1900.
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-19-2011, 07:03 PM   #10
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

I inherited a bag or two of what turned out to be reclaimed #8 shot, likely from a skeet range or something. It's pretty beat up with golf ball like dimples from adjacent pellets during firing and burrs from hitting a sandy/gravel backstop or something. I sure wouldn't shoot it without using shotcups for fear of embedded silica sand scratching the bbls. I bet it scatters like hell at close range though. I'm going to use some of it to fill the bags on my Caldwell rest; no need to use new shot for that purpose.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.