Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Hunting with Parkers

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
A visit with Lou
Unread 03-27-2021, 02:54 PM   #1
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default A visit with Lou

I visited Lou Rotelli this morning. He lives about 20 minutes away. I saw some restocks he was working on and I am always impressed with his work. He is a true craftsman and a nice guy. We talked at length about three things. I’ll discuss two of them because the third would probably start a firestorm on the board and that is the last thing I want.

His opinion is that the introduction of turkeys in our area is responsible for the decline of the grouse. He pointed to all the great grouse cover still in the area including around his house. I can’t really buy into his theory but I do have to admit that the grouse numbers started diminishing when the turkeys reached a high population. It might be just coincidence, I don’t know. Most attribute low grouse numbers to habitat quality and quantity, which is probably true for many areas of NY and Connecticut. But there is still plenty of great cover in my sections of NY and Connecticut. I don’t mean just pockets of good cover but large areas that should hold grouse. It’s always puzzled me. Wide spread disease could have something to do with it, but I have never heard of disease in my area. NY doesn’t even list it as one of its five reasons for diminishing populations. I am at a loss to explain it.

The other thing he mentioned was his belief that all fluid steel Parker barrels, with the exception of Whitworth on early high grade guns, was of the same steel. A case could be made that economics would have precluded the use of many different types of steel, despite what is stamped on the barrels. This sounds logical to me. I always had a suspicion that this was true. I believe that I remember that studies were done on Parker barrels but I don’t recall the results.

Incidentally, the woodcock are coming back from the south in numbers in my area. Lou has taken some trips with his pointer and reported back on the number of birds he was finding including one in his driveway. I might take my little setter out and see for myself.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 03-27-2021, 03:26 PM   #2
Member
Reggie B
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Reggie Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,490
Thanks: 2,936
Thanked 3,436 Times in 1,366 Posts

Default

Interesting topics. I have read numerous and varied opinions about the decline of quail here in the South. Some say it’s the change in farming methods. Some blame disease. Some say the loss is due to predators such as coyotes. Lots of studies have been conducted and lots of dollars have been expended and I still think no one knows for sure.

As far as Parker steel I will wait on Edgar to respond.
__________________
"A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way."
Reggie Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 03-27-2021, 03:46 PM   #3
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,285
Thanks: 462
Thanked 3,598 Times in 1,551 Posts

Default

The turkey/grouse thing has been discussed several times here. Consensus is that there is virtually no impact.

https://fwf.tennessee.edu/wp-content...opulations.pdf
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
Unread 03-27-2021, 04:32 PM   #4
Member
Brett Hoop
PGCA Member
 
Brett Hoop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 592
Thanks: 1,591
Thanked 899 Times in 370 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Dallas View Post
The turkey/grouse thing has been discussed several times here. Consensus is that there is virtually no impact.

https://fwf.tennessee.edu/wp-content...opulations.pdf
Not where I come from. Sorry not drinking the Punch. We had grouse before we were over run with turkeys. Not to say turkeys are the only reason grouse are long gone. Hawks and owls now have had protection so long that the impact they have is huge. Ask ANYONE who raises quail, pheasants or runs a bird hunting preserve. Oh they may not come clean to just anybody because it’s not PC and they don’t care to start the pissing match. They may then feel compelled to tell you how these things are dealt with minus the 25 year government study.

Something else hard to find is a kid that traps, another casualty to a PC world.

WNV, I do believe it has impact in some areas and some years, but it doesn’t effect just grouse. It doesn’t affect grouse at all in my area because there are zero. Lack of cover, I don’t buy into that either. There are many of us that are over 50 that could show you cover, young mixed disturbed, logged, green briar edged crab apple thickets and grape vine cover up against umbrella pines. 0 grouse for 30 years.
Brett Hoop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Brett Hoop For Your Post:
Unread 03-27-2021, 08:34 PM   #5
Member
Victor Wasylyna
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Victor Wasylyna's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 550
Thanks: 1,494
Thanked 1,463 Times in 328 Posts

Default

They faked the moon landing. Then, once they actually got there, turns out it’s made of cheese.

-Victor
Victor Wasylyna is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Victor Wasylyna For Your Post:
Unread 03-27-2021, 08:45 PM   #6
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,565
Thanks: 35,447
Thanked 33,047 Times in 12,326 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Flanigan View Post
I visited Lou Rotelli this morning.

The other thing he mentioned was his belief that all fluid steel Parker barrels, with the exception of Whitworth on early high grade guns, was of the same steel. A case could be made that economics would have precluded the use of many different types of steel, despite what is stamped on the barrels. This sounds logical to me. I always had a suspicion that this was true. I believe that I remember that studies were done on Parker barrels but I don’t recall the results.

This assertation has been presented here before and it has been scientifically and conclusively proven wrong, period.

Both Dave Suponski as well as Edgar Spencer have the scientific evidence on file.

I've heard that opinion about turkeys v. grouse before but there are too many other contributing factors not to be included in the very complex equation. And it is recently also a scientifically proven fact that WNV is responsible for a significant percentage of ruffed grouse mortalities.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 03-28-2021, 11:08 PM   #7
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,605 Times in 2,666 Posts

Default

The results of tests on the various Parker barrel steels demonstrated that there were slight differences within the broader range of barrel steels. Those results were published in the Parker Pages and discussed here numerous times . I think this was about ten years ago that the old inaccurate suggestion that the barrel steels were the same was put to rest. I am surprised to see it surface again. There is always somebody who does not get the word.

The barrels were sourced from various manufacturers .
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 03-29-2021, 08:52 AM   #8
Member
Steve Hodges
PGCA Member
 
Stephen Hodges's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 6,107
Thanked 3,196 Times in 891 Posts

Default

I do not know about the rest of the country, but here in New Hampshire our grouse population is directly effected each spring by just where the Moose walk.
__________________
Daniel Webster once said ""Men hang out their signs indicative of their respective trades; shoemakers hang out a gigantic shoe; jewelers a monster watch, and the dentist hangs out a gold tooth; but in the mountains of New Hampshire, God Almighty has hung out a sign to show that there He makes men."
Stephen Hodges is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stephen Hodges For Your Post:
Unread 03-29-2021, 10:01 AM   #9
Member
James L. Martin
PGCA Member
 
James L. Martin's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 709
Thanks: 848
Thanked 1,566 Times in 379 Posts

Default

Yes there are many factors causing the grouse decline but I believe the biggest single cause is without a doubt hawks and owls .
__________________
" May you build a ladder to the stars climb on every rung and may you stay forever young "
Bob Dylan
James L. Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to James L. Martin For Your Post:
Unread 03-29-2021, 10:13 AM   #10
Member
Mike of the Mountain
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,706
Thanks: 15,372
Thanked 8,679 Times in 2,635 Posts

Default

I know in our region of PA grouse numbers are effected by various factors, forest age/habitat type, predation, nesting season weather patterns and WNV just to name a few. In PA less than 10% of the forested acres are under 15 years old, the rest is mature/closed canopy forest which leads to a sterile environment on the forest floor. We have more predators now than even 20-30 years ago. We never had coyote and fisher. Bobcat populations are way up. I have bobcat on every trail cam here and I run 24-25 cams all year. Add in birds of prey and egg eating snakes and they all add up. Our spring weather over the past 10ish years has been wet. That is not conducive to chick survival. WNV has been proven to have high mortality rates within grouse populations in PA. If elevations are under 1200' the rate of infection is high due to the species of mosquito that transmits the WNV. They do not do well in higher elevations. Our PGC is addressing the problem. Lisa Williams is the head biologist for the grouse program. Se is very good at what she does, I trust her and have a working relationship with her. They did find flushing numbers were up over 20% in our region last season so there is hope.
Mike Koneski is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Koneski's homepage!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.