|
09-09-2020, 10:50 PM | #3 | ||||||
|
I’ve got a friend that’s plunked two of the swans with a Parker 28 shooting factory loaded #4 Bismuth one shot each and his friend hunting with him used a Remington 11/48 28 same load two shots two swans . Just saying .
__________________
Parker’s , 6.5mm’s , Mannlicher Schoenauer’s and my family in the Philippines ! |
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to CraigThompson For Your Post: |
09-10-2020, 12:35 AM | #4 | ||||||
|
I always like the old saying BB stands for "Big Bird". I think another variable is how close your shots will be, and you might not know that until you get there. I shot one 2 years ago with a 10 gauge Parker and black powder shells loaded with BBs. My shot was 15-20 yards and I dropped the swan first shot. In that situation, you could have used a much smaller shot and gauge. Though I was mighty proud to have done it with a Parker hammer gun and brass shells...
Last year, there was another blind close by that messed up the shooting. Shots this time were 40-50 yards. I brought an original sxs muzzleloader(with cylinder chokes), because by now I thought swan hunting was easy. I took 2 shots at a 40 yard bird and didn't come close. My friends with autoloaders had open chokes too and they didn't get any either. So next time I will be prepared for both situations(close and far). I think #2s would work all day long. I have a Sandhill Crane hunt in December and RST loaded me 10 gauge 2 7/8" 1 3/8oz Bismuth #2's at 1225fps. I would use those shells swan hunting as well(not in my hammer gun, but in a DH #3 frame. In a 12 sxs I would go with #2s. These are big birds and if you have to make a farther shot I would want bigger sized shot and tighter chokes. In close, open chokes(would help) and I still like the bigger shot sizes. However, in close even a 28 gauge with #4s would certainly work(as Craig mentioned)...If I can ever save up for a 28 gauge Parker I will try it I should be going this year too and I will have all bases covered this time... Good Luck! |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Oliver For Your Post: |
09-10-2020, 09:53 AM | #5 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post: |
09-11-2020, 05:46 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
Large shot used specifically for swan shooting was known in this country as early as 1775. Iroquois hunters routinely referenced and requested it from both French and British traders. I have never seen a notation of its true size (e.g., #2, BB, etc.) but undoubtedly it was a "standardized" size preferred for swans and geese.
|
||||||
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post: |
09-12-2020, 06:29 PM | #7 | ||||||
|
Actual "swan shot" is not spherical, it is more like an elongated raindrop in shape. A couple of decades ago Headrick gave me a small vial of it but I can't seem to lay my hands on it right now. Here is a video on how to make your own for a muzzle loader.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...tail&FORM=VIRE This guy's "swan shot" is far less uniform than I remember the stuff Headrick gave me.. From this 1905 ad it appears the Winchester Model 1897 and Winchester LEADER or REPEATER shells are just the ticket for the big birds. Swan ad 1905.jpg |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post: |
09-12-2020, 08:41 PM | #8 | ||||||
|
I never said it was spherical - I was merely trying to approximate the diameter of the head of the projectile relative to known standard shot sizes at the time - BB, #2, #4, etc.
The additional SP gravity/ mass of the 'tail' is a definite bonus impact-velocity wise. Sort of like measuring the head of Haley's Comet, which I'm sure NASA has done, then calculating the "freight train" effect of e=mc2 on the caboose. Your have to go through your shop and find Headrick's vial of sample shot. I need pics of it to select a proper sieve size for smelting my own swan loads. I don't think my wife's pasta collanders' holes are big enough and I don't feel like asking her if I can drill them out. Then I'll have to go out and buy a used MEC 600 10 gauge press to do hand loads and try to modify it for 8 ga. Then I'll have to buy an 8 gauge SxS with a heavy enough frame to handle these whompers and have 10 ga. inserts made for it to fool the warden if he checks me. (Maybe I can get my good buddy Morris Baker to load me a run of a couple of boxes of 3 1/2"-4" shells of non-toxic shot). Then I can apply for a swan permit in some legal state within driving distance. THANKS A LOT, DAVE! |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kevin McCormack For Your Post: |
09-13-2020, 03:04 AM | #9 | ||||||
|
Kevin, I have a lifetime supply of Eley bismuth eight gauge ammo and a good selection of eight gauge guns with inserts. If you can arrange a reliable swan guide in NC, I will supply the guns and ammo.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post: |
09-13-2020, 02:53 PM | #10 | ||||||
|
bill is those inserts 8 ga to 10 ga or 8 ga to 12 ga...I have the 8 ga to 12 ga inserts...I have shot several of the 3 1/2 inch 12 ga magnum shells thru them....those 12 ga magnums still kick pretty good in those heavy 8 ga guns....I wish I had the 8 ga to 10 ga inserts....charlie
|
||||||
|
|