Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Butt on 1894 G ??
Unread 01-03-2012, 12:14 AM   #1
Member
Bill Faulk
Banned

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 583
Thanks: 296
Thanked 273 Times in 124 Posts

Default Butt on 1894 G ??

Has anyone ever seen this buttplate on a Papker gun.Plate is on a 1894
Dam barrel 12 ga I am looking at ??
Attached Images
File Type: jpg old parker butt.jpg (90.0 KB, 10 views)
william faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 05:36 AM   #2
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,708
Thanks: 35,847
Thanked 33,423 Times in 12,425 Posts

Default

Not me, but it's a pretty one and not 'overdone'.

How about showing a couple of pictures of the rest of the stock?
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 06:22 AM   #3
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,663
Thanks: 6,208
Thanked 8,949 Times in 4,792 Posts

Default

Elegant.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 08:37 AM   #4
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,615
Thanks: 487
Thanked 17,742 Times in 4,646 Posts

Default

Might not be original. Pattern is not like anyone I have seen on other Parkers with checkered butt. Also, would a checkered butt have even been available on the G grade? Maybe by special order only?
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 01-03-2012, 06:11 PM   #5
Member
ed good
On Vacation

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 787
Thanks: 205
Thanked 203 Times in 124 Posts

Default

very nice work.
ed good is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 07:12 PM   #6
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 1,673
Thanked 4,955 Times in 1,402 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
Might not be original. Pattern is not like anyone I have seen on other Parkers with checkered butt. Also, would a checkered butt have even been available on the G grade? Maybe by special order only?
Brian my 1934 GHE Skeet came with a checkered butt which was standard treatment for V and G grade skeet guns. The pattern here is much different.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 08:13 PM   #7
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,799 Times in 3,968 Posts

Default

i like it whether it be original or not... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-03-2012, 09:36 PM   #8
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,708
Thanks: 35,847
Thanked 33,423 Times in 12,425 Posts

Default

A good many Parkers either came 'standard' with the checkered butt as pete indicates or with the note in the order "no butt" or "no butt plate" and were therefore checkered. The great majority of checkered butts were done in this style or something very close to this one.


.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg VHE checkered butt with plugs.jpg (147.6 KB, 2 views)
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 08:07 AM   #9
Member
Double Play
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Larry Frey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,303
Thanks: 930
Thanked 2,770 Times in 635 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
or with the note in the order "no butt" or "no butt plate" and were therefore checkered.

.
Dean,
I have asked the question regarding the "no butt" notation several times here and to various gunsmiths and collectors and could never get a consensus answer. Where did you get the information that leads you to the conclusion that "no butt" represents the checkered butt treatment? I don't doubt that what you say is true but would be interested if it is documented somewhere or just speculation. Thanks, Larry
Larry Frey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2012, 08:43 AM   #10
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,663
Thanks: 6,208
Thanked 8,949 Times in 4,792 Posts

Default

This was discussed here not long ago. In my diminished mental condition, I can't remember what evidence was presented or what conclusion we reached. I have seen a bunch more Parker orders for "no butt" than I have seen Parkers with checkered wood butts.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.