Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Reloading and short chambers
Unread 10-13-2010, 12:52 PM   #1
Member
Side X Side
Forum Associate
 
richard lambert's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Thanks: 33
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts

Default Reloading and short chambers

This is a subject I posted in another forum but thought it would be a good one to pose here.

I am not trying to put anyone down but looking for an open discussion on the subject of shooting longer shells in short chambers of older shotguns. For years I have read of this practice being done.

1. Is this practice reasonable with low pressure loads?
2. Would a steady diet of longer shells in shorter chambers, rather low pressure or not, cause an older shotgun's action to loosen.
3. If one reloads for an older (shooter not collectible) shotgun, would it be acceptable to lengthen the forcing cone and shoot low pressure 2 3/4 shells.

An article in "Gun Reports" by Russell Corbitt addresses some of this. Article

Dick
richard lambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2010, 01:09 PM   #2
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
Thanks: 1,513
Thanked 561 Times in 311 Posts

Default

In all of the articles I have read on the subject, the answer was always 'Yes, pressure increases slightly'. Would the pressure increase to the point of peeling open a composite or fluid steel barrel? That was always the part where the author/researcher bowed out. I suppose it is a liability issue like some one asking on the forum if their gun is safe to shoot. We all agree that the person should have them looked at by a qualified individual. I suppose the guys writing short chamber articles don't want to be held liable. I would think that if pressure increases, the rearward thrust on the breechface would increase, along with forward thrust on the hook. I dunno. I will watch this thread, too. Cheers!
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'

Last edited by Mark Landskov; 10-13-2010 at 04:02 PM..
Mark Landskov is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2010, 01:47 PM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,557
Thanks: 35,430
Thanked 33,039 Times in 12,321 Posts

Default

"Common knowledge" says that shooting 2 3/4" shells in chambers designed for 2 1/2" shells will cause an average increase in pressure of maybe as much as 150 psi.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2010, 02:19 PM   #4
Member
Side X Side
Forum Associate
 
richard lambert's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Thanks: 33
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
"Common knowledge" says that shooting 2 3/4" shells in chambers designed for 2 1/2" shells will cause an average increase in pressure of maybe as much as 150 psi.
Pretty small pressure increase when dealing with low pressure shells I would think.
richard lambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2010, 02:32 PM   #5
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

It is not the pressure one has to worry about. It is the increased recoil! I do not know exactly why but it is true...
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-13-2010, 04:58 PM   #6
Member
Side X Side
Forum Associate
 
richard lambert's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 56
Thanks: 33
Thanked 34 Times in 8 Posts

Default

From 12006 "16 Ga. Gun Talk" Topic

ITHACA CHAMBERS -- The last Flues period catalogue (1925) states -- "Unless otherwise ordered Ithaca 28 Gauge and 20 Gauge guns are chambered for the standard 2 1/2 inch shell, 16 Gauge and 12 Gauge for the standard 2 3/4 inch shell and 10 Gauge for the standard 2 7/8 inch shell. Longer chambers are furnished if ordered on new guns without extra charge, but it should be remembered that shells of standard length do not give quite as good results in chambers which are longer than the shells and it should be remembered that extra long shells are more expensive and it is much harder to find a dealer who carries extra long shells in stock."

In the published book "The Parker Story, the Remington vintage specification sheets on pages 164 to 169 call for a chamber 1/8-inch shorter than the shell for which it is intended. I have a 1930-vintage VH-grade 0-frame 20-gauge and its chambers are 2 3/8 inches intended for the old 2 1/2 inch shells, eight years after the 20-gauge Super-X shell was introduced in a 2 3/4 inch case!!"

American Rifleman: "And here's the reason why better patterns resulted from slightly overlength shells in short chambers (or chambers marked 2 3/4" that weren't really that long): Remember that we're talking the pre-WWII days, paper cases and felt or cork wads, no plastic shotcups. One reason for pellet deformation back in those days is that the unprotected pellets would slam into the walls of the forcing cone when the gun was fired. However, if the paper case mouth opened into the forcing cone, the mouth of the shell itself afforded some protection to the shot charge, on its initial contact with the bore. Tests established that slightly shorter chambers resulted in tighter patterns. Some trap shooters even when so far as to shoot 3" shells in 2 3/4" guns. Today, of course, with plastic hulls and wads, there's no longer any pattern benefit to shooting longer shells in short chambers, because the wad itself does a much better job of protecting the shot."
__________________
richard lambert is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to richard lambert For Your Post:
Unread 10-13-2010, 06:06 PM   #7
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
Thanks: 1,513
Thanked 561 Times in 311 Posts

Default

Richard, that American Rifleman article is interesting. That is the first time I heard of that theory!
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-14-2010, 06:48 PM   #8
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Ah, it sounds like a very good theory. I have a Parker 10ga with 2 5/8 chambers. It has about a .020 "step", so for that reason I cut shells. If it had the regular forcing cone I'd just shoot the longer shells. As to shooting shorter shells in longer chambers you'd get some blow-by and pressure loss. I've read that chambers of old were shorter so the cushion wad would still have some in the shell as the front was at the end of the forcing cone; thus giving a good seal. Paul
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 10-17-2010, 08:02 AM   #9
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
Thanks: 1,513
Thanked 561 Times in 311 Posts

Default

Paul, my 10 gauge 1879 Lifter is configured like yours. I have a 'cheesy' inside divider and managed a crude measurement of .809" about 2" forward of the chamber. There is an imperceptible jump from the chamber to the bore. The chokes measure .790"-ish (I don't have the figures at my desk). I questioned the bore size, but have been informed that Parker bores, at that time, were not always consistent with any set standard. I will re-check my measurements this evening. I am preparing to chase the Ruffies this morning with my RBL. Cheers!
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-18-2010, 12:47 PM   #10
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Mark, I have a 12ga Parker with .742 bores. Some of the more knowledgeable on this board have stated that Parkers before certain serial numbers had larger than standard bores. I have a 11ga Claybrough with .765 bores. The chambers almost took 10ga shells so I opened them up enough to take 10 to 12ga Gaugemates. Paul
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.