Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-31-2019, 01:42 PM   #11
Member
Jeff K.
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 792
Thanked 2,793 Times in 651 Posts

Default

Michael,
Your gun is a PH. It has an extractor and not ejectors. The H is for hammerless and the E is for ejectors. Your gun is too early to have factory ejectors unless they had been returned and retro fitted with them.
Jeff Kuss is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-31-2019, 01:56 PM   #12
Member
Michael McClung
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts

Default

Thank you - have a terrific Labor Day weekend.
Michael McClung is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-31-2019, 02:01 PM   #13
Member
Richard Dow
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 127
Thanks: 5
Thanked 101 Times in 46 Posts

Default

Thanks Jeff. I should have looked a little closer.
Richard Dow is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-31-2019, 02:36 PM   #14
Member
winplumber
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,631
Thanks: 1,757
Thanked 634 Times in 403 Posts

Default

Buttstock looks to be a replacement also
Steve Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Steve Huffman For Your Post:
Unread 08-31-2019, 05:07 PM   #15
Member
Michael McClung
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts

Default

Thanks Jeff - That makes perfect sense. I was conflating the terms extractor and ejector. When you mention that the butstock is a replacement, you mean the rubber pad at the end of the stock that softens the kick to one’s shoulder, correct? In other words, the wooden part of the stock seems original?

Also, is it possible that the replacement butstock was installed over the original which may still be under there? Wishful thinking probably...

Do you have a sense of the value of the gun?

Many thanks,

Michael
Michael McClung is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-31-2019, 05:24 PM   #16
Member
Richard Flanders
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Richard Flanders's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 8,480
Thanked 5,538 Times in 1,717 Posts

Default

The stock is not likely original.
Richard Flanders is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-31-2019, 09:01 PM   #17
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,789 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

but your gun is not a ejector gun thus just a ph grade....charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to charlie cleveland For Your Post:
Unread 09-01-2019, 04:09 PM   #18
Member
Michael McClung
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts

Default

Thanks everyone - shame about the stock, but I am happy to know what I have and that the gun is a PH.

If anyone has guidance about value, I would appreciate it. I will request the research letter now.

My Best,

Michael McClung
Michael McClung is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-01-2019, 08:03 PM   #19
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,578
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,518 Times in 4,619 Posts

Default

The whole buttstock (wood) is not original. That style of grip was popular with some trap shooters over the years. But will never be seen on a factory Parker double. Also, the cheeks, comb, checkering is not correct. The head is too full as well.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is online now   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 09-02-2019, 09:23 AM   #20
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,580
Thanks: 6,148
Thanked 8,854 Times in 4,747 Posts

Default

Our comments about the stock not being original are not neccesarily negative. Aside from a bit of overlap at the receiver and the non original shape of the grip, it appears to be a very attractive stocking job that will not detract from the value of a gun that has no value beyond that of a shooter. As a shooter, you probably have a very nice example of an early hammerless PH. We apparently don't know the frame size of the second set of barrels, but a picture of the bottom of the rear lugs on the two sets will clear that up.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Murphy For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.