Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Damascus Barrels & Steel

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-25-2014, 07:37 PM   #21
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,787 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

what a blast beycha need ear plugs for this one..really nice cannon..charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-25-2014, 07:53 PM   #22
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

I am blown away by that beautiful Model 97! After reading every word that Sherman Bell wrote about shooting damascus barrels I am confident in shooting mine with standard shells, but I do lean towards shells that produce no more than 10k cup. Nine is better yet.

Bell did his best to destroy Parker (other makers too) damascus barrels and he had a heck of a time to load one heavy enough to get it to blow and even then he had to jam an obstruction of some sort down the tube. I do shoot a lot of RST, but not because I have to.

It would be a treat to shoot that fine 97! Just holding it would be a joy.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-26-2014, 06:09 PM   #23
Member
Mike Franzen
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Mike Franzen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,862
Thanks: 1,255
Thanked 4,374 Times in 1,314 Posts

Default

I would love to find one of those. I've heard there were only 5 made that way. One was owned by a celeb ( I can't remember his name, but he was featured hunting with it on some show).
Mike Franzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Mike Franzen's homepage!
Unread 01-26-2014, 09:08 PM   #24
Member
GH-16
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,002
Thanks: 5,135
Thanked 1,304 Times in 445 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Franzen View Post
I would love to find one of those. I've heard there were only 5 made that way. One was owned by a celeb ( I can't remember his name, but he was featured hunting with it on some show).
I know of four Damascus barreled 97's. The two featured here, another a collector friend ran across & the one I just sent off to Bachelders for Brad to look over. I'm sure there are many more, but how many is anyones guess, it was an expensive upgrade for a technology that was on the way out at the time.

Charley,

After re-reading the text. Winchester said they proofed the barrels with 9 1/2 drams & the assembled gun at 4 1/2 drams. I assume they had some sort of test fixture they mounted just the barrels in and probably loaded the barrel full of powder & shot for the test charge. Just my guess !!
Paul Ehlers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-26-2014, 09:54 PM   #25
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

I read somewhere that every single Model 97 model 12 was a 2 3/4 inch gun. Is that true? Early model 12s were not, and I had to have a Nickle Steel gun's chamber lengthened some. I also had the forcing cone eased. I have not touched my 97.
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-27-2014, 08:42 PM   #26
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,787 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

thanks for the up date on the powder charge...that makes since to me now...maybe they used some of those long 6 inch 12 ga hulls i ve seen they would hold 9 1/2 drams of powder and 2 1/2 ounce of shot....any way a stout charge for sure and the 4 1/2 drams is a stout load too...charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-28-2014, 01:00 PM   #27
Member
Steve McCarty
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 306 Times in 211 Posts

Default

According to Bell, the reason that damascus barrels got the rep for blowing up was that the first smokeless powders closely mimicked black in volume, so guys could reload their shell with smokeless using the BP scoop/equipment. Smokeless, again from Bell, first came out in 1863!

Then someone invented something like Unique, and when loaded to equal volume as black, a shell so loaded produced 80,000 cup. BOOM! In short, damascus barrels have always been plenty strong. The Brits have been re-proofing them for years!

Now, should we go around trying to blow up a damascus barrel? Nope, your off hand goes with it and maybe a few were poorly made. But I don't hesitate to shoot my GH with standard shells. It is full and full so I shoot RST spreaders in one tube and a standard shell in the other. Viola! I've got a full and modified gun!
Steve McCarty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Steve McCarty For Your Post:
Unread 01-29-2014, 05:19 PM   #28
Member
Milton Starr
Forum Associate
 
Milton Starr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 321
Thanks: 94
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McCarty View Post
According to Bell, the reason that damascus barrels got the rep for blowing up was that the first smokeless powders closely mimicked black in volume, so guys could reload their shell with smokeless using the BP scoop/equipment. Smokeless, again from Bell, first came out in 1863!

Then someone invented something like Unique, and when loaded to equal volume as black, a shell so loaded produced 80,000 cup. BOOM! In short, damascus barrels have always been plenty strong. The Brits have been re-proofing them for years!

Now, should we go around trying to blow up a damascus barrel? Nope, your off hand goes with it and maybe a few were poorly made. But I don't hesitate to shoot my GH with standard shells. It is full and full so I shoot RST spreaders in one tube and a standard shell in the other. Viola! I've got a full and modified gun!
steve my 10 bore if choked M/F and agree about the ruggedness of good Damascus . I have done put about 40rds through my Damascus barrels and love em
Milton Starr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-15-2015, 08:07 AM   #29
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,612 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Returning to the top for the person who asked if anyone has seen a composite barreled '97.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.