Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
why is my Fox a Parker?
Unread 05-05-2020, 01:43 PM   #1
Member
RickR
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 9 Posts

Default why is my Fox a Parker?

My “affair” with doubles began PM (Pre Macintosh) when 50 years ago I bought an A grade Fox. I soon became so involved that for a time I had a hobby business of repair and rehabilitation giving me hands on with quite a few different brands, and Fox's were always a favorite when it came to "keepers".

Life changed and I was forced to sell them all and until I bought a Parker hammer gun as a project and joined up here, I hadn’t done a rehabilitation in decades, but did a second gun while Covid stuck me at home, and then…

A Sterlingworth showed up on an auction site that not only had the recessed pin, but also a checkering pattern exactly like a Parker VH. I bought it to rehabilitate as a shooter and it arrived just now. Doing what research I could and with a Fox collector’s association now existing had much more info.

I’m really confused now. The site said Parker stopped using the dished out pin in 1912-13. My Krupp barreled “A” had an SN 7443 forgot the exact year, but the dished pin was gone. How could a dished pin be on the Sterly with a SN of 53,XXX? Even a separate number sequence for them couldn’t be that high, as it would mean by 1913 fox had made fewer than 10,000 graded guns, but 53,000 Sterlingworths?

Also, this is the only Sterly I’ve seen that’s such an obvious and successful Parker cosmetic copy. This one also has checkered fences, and I’m inclined to think that checkering wasn’t factory, but if not done as an add on option, it was applied when the gun was near new given the usage dingles on top of the design.

How old is my gun (barrels don’t say Cromox (sp) or Krupp), just Made by A.H. Fox?

What’s the real story over the dished pin guns and copying Parker (for a little while only) checkering pattern exactly?

I’m going to have to do some stock repairs obviously, but the gun is a delight in the hand, haven’t weighed it yet, but it can’t be more than 7 lbs. and an ounce or two. Reminds me of my one time 1 1/2 frame VH grouse gun.

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screen Shot 2020-05-05 at 12.28.00 PM.jpg (118.2 KB, 66 views)
Rick Rappe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Rappe For Your Post:
Unread 05-05-2020, 02:02 PM   #2
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,807
Thanks: 1,646
Thanked 8,155 Times in 3,259 Posts

Default

they are called Pin Guns - not rare- but only the earlier Sterlingworths had a recessed pin. I have a nice 30" 12ga one

that checkering is not factory

Quote:
The site said Parker stopped using the dished out pin in 1912-13.
i think you meant Fox

Quote:
but 53,000 Sterlingworths?
they started at 50,000


https://www.foxcollectors.com/fox-gu...orth-directory
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 05-05-2020, 04:41 PM   #3
Member
RickR
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 9 Posts

Default

Yes, I meant Fox stopped using the recessed pins in 1912-13, per the Fox site. That Sterlies began at 50,000 answers that it indeed is an early one. Thanks.

As for the checkering, I tend to agree that the checkered fences were applied later, but not much later, and they were cut by someone experienced such that they COULD have been an add on option, as they are also smaller diamonds which was IMO typical of factory checkered fences, hinting if a factory option, would have more probably been done as is on this gun.

If you are inferring that the grip checkering is not factory, then I disagree as the Fox site shows this Parker style grip and fore end checkering on their photo of an early Sterly. While All the others I've seen photos of have a lesser, more simple pattern.

I'm hoping someone knows the story to share here as the other site didn't help. By 1912-13 Ansley Fox was no longer associated with the AH Fox Gun Company. Did the new owners deliberately try to tap into the Parker market by copying them? If so why did they stop?
Rick Rappe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2020, 04:58 PM   #4
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,807
Thanks: 1,646
Thanked 8,155 Times in 3,259 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Rappe View Post
Yes, I meant Fox stopped using the recessed pins in 1912-13, per the Fox site. That Sterlies began at 50,000 answers that it indeed is an early one. Thanks.

As for the checkering, I tend to agree that the checkered fences were applied later, but not much later, and they were cut by someone experienced such that they COULD have been an add on option, as they are also smaller diamonds which was IMO typical of factory checkered fences, hinting if a factory option, would have more probably been done as is on this gun.

If you are inferring that the grip checkering is not factory, then I disagree as the Fox site shows this Parker style grip and fore end checkering on their photo of an early Sterly. While All the others I've seen photos of have a lesser, more simple pattern.

I'm hoping someone knows the story to share here as the other site didn't help. By 1912-13 Ansley Fox was no longer associated with the AH Fox Gun Company. Did the new owners deliberately try to tap into the Parker market by copying them? If so why did they stop?
yes - i was referring to the cheek checkering - that was not offered as a factory option on the sterlingworths- the point of the sterlingworth was a basic gun built to a price point - few if any options - 3 barrel lengths and eventually 3 gauges

the sterlingworth was simply an attempt to get some of the basic price point market - without digging out the Fox book- so working from memory, I think the recessed pin design was dropped because it cost more to do it..

Ansley did not want a basic grade gun - the earliest ones say Sterlingworth Co. to separate them from the firm, that was also soon dropped and AH Fox was added

the original iteration of the Fox Gun Company/Baltimore Arms Company also used the recessed pin design
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 05-05-2020, 06:25 PM   #5
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,608
Thanks: 1,632
Thanked 7,835 Times in 2,362 Posts

Default

Ansley H. Fox Gun Co. graded guns A- to FE-grade had a smooth profile from the beginning in 1905. Here is an early 2-digit serial number gun from the Wayne & Bristol Streets days (1905-06) --

18 01 A-Grade.jpg

Only the first 12000 or so 12-gauge Sterlingworths had the recessed hinge pin. In 1910 they were marketed under the name The Sterlingworth Co.

50145 The Sterlingworth Co. 03.jpg

To further distance them from the Ansley H. Fox double the early guns were marked Wayne Junction instead of Philadelphia.

50180 The Sterlingworth Co. 01.jpg

and they even issued their own The Sterlingworth Co, catalog for 1910. By 1911, this entry-level gun was included in the A.H. Fox Gun Co. catalog --

Sterlingworth picture 1911.jpg

Sterlingworth text 1911.jpg

Ansley's earlier companies, Fox Gun Co., Balto., MD. U.S.A. (1898-99) --

438 B 01.png

and the Philadelphia Arms Co. (1902 t0 1906) --

262 A-Grade 01.jpg
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 153 01, Left Close.jpg (58.1 KB, 2 views)
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-06-2020, 11:47 AM   #6
Member
RickR
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 9 Posts

Default

I guess I was hoping for some drama. Like a Parker/Fox battle over an upstart making a gun thats a cosmetic direct copy of "Old Reliable".

Instead its the same old story of start up failures because the engineer doesn't understand all the obstacles of bringing a better mousetrap to market.

"Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door." Umm, not necessarily.

The pin guns are an example of not having a handle on production cost. If, we accept dropping the recessed pin was an economy move, then we need to assume it cost MORE to machine the Sterlingworth pin version's receiver than the graded guns.

Yes, I knew the earlier guns all had recessed pins. Still have old black/white photos of my Philly Arms "B" grade and my 7xxx "A". Logic says the Sterlingworth should never have had the recessed pins, and if it hung around at all, would have been on the higher grade guns.

Got the stock off, finish stripped, dents steamed and began wiping on French Red walnut stain to get the original color correct. Off to the hardware store for some supplies, hoping to get the gun together in time to shoot it this weekend, and then take my time with the cosmetic details with the end goal of turning the appearance from beat up and abused to well used but well cared for and as "originalish" as possible.

Gun is a delight, in that it fits me. I'm happy.

Rick
Rick Rappe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-06-2020, 11:59 AM   #7
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,532 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

The "Pin" sterlingworths are kind of a carryover from the earlier Philadelphia arms shotguns which were very much a copy of Parker guns from a cosmetic standpoint (frame profiling was very similar, recessed hinge pin, the forend parts are identical to parkers and the rib matting and makers marks are also identical). The Philly arms guns also had some parts in them that were right out of the LC smith Parts bins. I actually suspect that Fox (philly arms) may have actually purchased raw parts from these other makers to save work on their end.

The only hold over in the "Pin" sterlingworths from the Philly Arms guns was the recessed pin and the checkering patterns used on the wrists. I do not know why they would have decided to hold these features on only the Sterlingworth, and not the graded guns of the same period. The "pin" sterlingworths are certainly a curiosity for these reasons to most people.

Another tidbit of information on these guns is that they were only made for less than 3 years and they actually have 3 different forend fastening systems on them that are all totally different from each other. The first style used was the "Baker" style latch which utilized a "J" spring to hold the forend on. Many of these fronds ended up getting lost over the years and they are very hard to find due to their limited production.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 05-06-2020, 12:44 PM   #8
Member
Wild Skies
PGCA Member
 
Greg Baehman's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,244
Thanks: 1,149
Thanked 3,617 Times in 988 Posts

Default

Isn't a Parker's action a little longer than a Fox Pin gun's action?

For those that have both, would you please measure yours and report back?
__________________
Wild Skies
Since 1951
Greg Baehman is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-06-2020, 01:03 PM   #9
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,532 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

Yes, a Parkers action is longer. Not that it matters too much. They are two completely different designs internally.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 05-06-2020, 02:29 PM   #10
Member
todd allen
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,143
Thanks: 1,916
Thanked 3,268 Times in 1,131 Posts

Default

The longer water table makes a stronger lock-up. (everything else being equal)
todd allen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.