Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-13-2011, 04:46 PM   #11
Member
John D.
PGCA Lifer
Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,437
Thanks: 2,183
Thanked 4,162 Times in 825 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Lewis View Post
... I sure hope the powder is OK?
So will the guy who reads the chart, runs out to buy heavy modern field loads - and ends up missing a few fingers '..when we let them know about when they ask what they can shoot..'. I'd never recommend anyone shooting anything. Period. Why??

I haven't seen the gun, measured wall thickness, seen the condition of the bore, size, dia, wood condition, whatever - all of it... And even if I had - would defer that to a QUALIFIED gunsmith... And I can assure you - no qualified gunsmith will make a prognosis based on pictures, descriptions, whatever - certainly an Internet description.. They'll require seeing it in person...

And oh - BTW - 4dr of FFF (about 108/109gr) behind a 1 1/8 load (12 GA) is about 6900~7000 PSI (primer depending). Modern field loads are "how much higher" (see below - I never ask a question that I'm not pretty certain of the answer.. That's just me, tho') ..??

In short - I'd never suggest shooting heavy modern loads until the Parker is checked out by someone qualified. - And I'd never tell them what they can shoot, as I'm NOT a qualified gunsmith..

And oh #2.... Just to see the pressure differences..???

3dr of BP is about 4900 PSI... (7.5 shot - 1 1/8 OZ) ~1,205 FPS
3dr Equivalent (21gr WW 450AA (great powder!!) of SMOKELESS is about 9600 PSI - ~1,205 FPS

So, here is the next question....

Since the Parker Reference load table is all Black Powder... Anyone know the PROOF load for BP?? Want to guess if it was lower than even the 9,600 PSI smokeless load listed above..??

Best to all,

John
John Dunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Dunkle For Your Post:
Unread 01-13-2011, 04:53 PM   #12
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,924 Times in 869 Posts

Default

Bruce,

Can you scan the tables and email it to me? Scan at 300bpi or better and it should be nice and clear.

Robin
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2011, 04:57 PM   #13
Member
Bindlestiff
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Robin Lewis's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,118
Thanks: 703
Thanked 2,924 Times in 869 Posts

Default

Yes John, your point is why I was/am reluctant to get into specifics like this. I tried to point out that the table was obsolete and being from Parker in black powder would make it more history information. Nothing was or is a recommendation, just historical information but I will add this explicitly if the FAQ remains.

Thanks John! I just looked, you did it for me before I could get back there.
Robin Lewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2011, 05:02 PM   #14
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

John,

I agree that all guns should be checked for barrel wall thickness and overall condition.

You made a good point about the smokeless dram equivilant pressure being different that of black powder. The proof table used by Parker is on page 515 of The Parker Story.

Caution is good and no one is suggesting feeding their Parker a steady diet of SAAMI Maximum pressure loads. The guns however were built to take those pressures. They are however about 100 years old so one should be careful and limit the amout that we punish them.

PS: Bruce I sent you my email and snail mail addresses if you would be so kind as to send me the table?

Respectfully,
Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2011, 05:03 PM   #15
Member
John D.
PGCA Lifer
Admin

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,437
Thanks: 2,183
Thanked 4,162 Times in 825 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Lewis View Post
Yes John, your point is why...
Hi Robin,

Yep - I alread added that in RED As well - I changed one typo:

Black Powder Drama

to

Black Powder Drams...

Frankly - I should have just left "Black Powder Drama..??

Best to you!

John
John Dunkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2011, 09:37 AM   #16
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,594
Thanks: 6,160
Thanked 8,874 Times in 4,756 Posts

Default

At the same time that Parker Brothers stated in the "Small Bore" brochure that a 7/8 ounce 20 gauge load was excessive and "not recommended", they were building guns in 20 gauge intended for 1 ounce of shot and 3 drams equivalent loads.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.