Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-08-2013, 08:18 PM   #11
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,787 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

i mite could see this being the problem with a large size shot such as a no2 or a bb size shoy in lead...but could be possible the reloader was useing steel shot..just my opinion ... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-10-2013, 11:45 AM   #12
Member
J.B. Books
PGCA Member
 
Pete Lester's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,862
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 4,798 Times in 1,368 Posts

Default

An increasing trend? The old timers didn't stretch their hulls as far as they could and then some, especially in the Depression? I am certainly no expert but if it's an increasing trend perhaps it's related to something relatively new like harder than lead shot??? Maybe there is a history of this phenomenon but this is the first I have heard of it.
Pete Lester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete Lester For Your Post:
Unread 12-10-2013, 03:33 PM   #13
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,161
Thanks: 3,465
Thanked 5,942 Times in 1,437 Posts

Default

The barrels I looked at were damaged back in the 70's so not steel. I had understood this was more of a common problem years ago. With all of the years of combined experience I am surprised someone has not seen this before.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-12-2013, 08:26 PM   #14
Member
John Farrell, Charter Member #33
Forum Associate
 
John Farrell's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 335
Thanks: 100
Thanked 141 Times in 78 Posts

Default

This conversation supports roll crimping shells for use in older double guns. Roll crimping was the standard when most of the old guns were made, so . . .

Or the basis of a new conspiracy theory has been created.
John Farrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-13-2013, 05:51 PM   #15
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

My theory is that back in the day if you missed to many birds the aliens would punish the hunter by messing with the barrel. If you were really a bad shot they'd let you load the new smoke less powder with your old Black Powder measure and blow up the barrel. And by golly that's what I believe - now someone prove I'm wrong.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 12-14-2013, 02:56 PM   #16
Member
Dennis
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 666
Thanks: 48
Thanked 418 Times in 202 Posts

Default

I have never seen the type of barrel damage described so will just have to imagine what it might look like. I am wondering though how it could happen unless the shooter was extremely unlucky. If the shooter was shooting at flying targets and the gun was pointed up after the first barrel was shot the gun would probably still be in the up position making it unlikely the shot would roll down the barrel. If the shooter was firing at a ground target such as a rabbit then the barrels would be pointed down and one would think the shot would have started rolling down the barrel as was described in the opening paragraph of this thread. How unlikely would it have to be that the unlucky shooter would ALWAYS shoot the second barrel as the indicated shot pellet would be in the same position of the barrel? I have no idea what is causing the damage but for it to always be in the same place if you accept the open crimp theory seems unlikely to me.

For those who will check their shotshells and pull the loads, why not simply fire them in the right barrel? Seems like a lot less work.

Forgive me if I am missing somethiing here.

Dennis
Dennis V. Nix is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-17-2013, 10:54 AM   #17
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Maybe some poor soul didn't have the money for shot and was using gravel ?
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 12-17-2013, 12:28 PM   #18
Member
John Farrell, Charter Member #33
Forum Associate
 
John Farrell's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 335
Thanks: 100
Thanked 141 Times in 78 Posts

Default

No matter how the gun would be held, the "loose shot lying in the barrel" would end up either on the ground or in the receiver. I think it's physically impossible to get a second shell into the chamber, either by mechanical action or hand feeding a new shell in and not have the barrel pointing up or down. Sounds to me like a crop of hogwash is floating around in the universe, again. Probably started by someone located near Area 51.
John Farrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-17-2013, 11:19 PM   #19
Member
Eldon Goddard
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 841
Thanks: 312
Thanked 389 Times in 169 Posts

Default

Area 51 is real, try getting close without getting arrested. Both my grandpas worked at "The Base". One unloaded A bomb parts from a B52. The other built the houses, pig pens, buildings, etc. That they would blow up. Who knows what was actually at area 51, but I doubt there is anything there now. Although they still conduct critical mass tests underground.
Eldon Goddard is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-17-2013, 11:25 PM   #20
Member
Phil C
PGCA Member
 
Phillip Carr's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,161
Thanks: 3,465
Thanked 5,942 Times in 1,437 Posts

Default

I think Mr Merrington would be qualified to judge what causes such small bulges. Since I was able to examine a set of 21 barrels currently with him for repair I can testify I have seen the UFO . Possible I could get some pictures. My understanding as to how this can happen is as follows. In fact I was shooting quail today over my dogs with my sxs. I shot the right barrel followed by shooting the left barrel only a few hundred's of a second apart. When hunting I have done this many times. I have never experienced an issue doing this. I am guessing that many of us do this regularly. I am not under the impression that pimple bulges are an epidemic but that it can happen.The theory is that upon firing the right barrel the shotgun recoils. The shotgun is stopped from recoiling as far as it would if your shoulder did not stop. This reaction forces some of the shot which may not be properly restrained (the crimp) to be thrust down the left barrel out of the loose crimped shell at a much slower speed then the pellets that are soon to follow at about 1100 fps., when the left barrel is fired. I think that whether the barrels are pointed down, up, or level this could still be an issue. Some pellets may in fact clear the muzzle, some just may not.
Phillip Carr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.