Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-15-2013, 01:49 PM   #11
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Don't think it's primers or improper cleaning or both sides would be effected. And all my guns are treated the same way after shooting but only the hammer guns have this problem. And only on the left side.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 07-15-2013, 02:44 PM   #12
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

I guess after shooting/cleaning muzzle loaders for 35yrs maybe I got a bit lax in maintaining my breech loaders. For 10 years or so I never oiled the breech face after shooting clays for a day, and never had a problem. And if I would have, I'd never have seen it now. From hence forth I will clean and store them properly. That said, it's still a strange phenomenon.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 07-15-2013, 04:40 PM   #13
Member
Double Lab
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Daryl Corona's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,317
Thanks: 15,389
Thanked 6,268 Times in 2,424 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Campbell View Post
First, WD-40 is one of the best products I know to prevent rust. Not so much for lubrication however. Secondly, the reason any gun metal oxidizes is improper cleaning after use. I've scrubbed my guns with Hoppes No. 9, bronze brush, and clean patches after every use and have never had a bit of rust.
"bore snakes" etc. and other quickie methods are NOT cleaning a gun.
Finally, priming might be a culprit. If you are using import primers, try switching to US make. However, I shoot thousands of Fiocchi and Nobel primers with no problems. I dislike Cheddites however.
John;
I agree with you on the WD40 but what do you dislike about the Cheddite primers? I've been using them for about 2 years and have found them comparable to WW209's but cheaper.
Daryl Corona is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-15-2013, 04:49 PM   #14
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 583
Thanked 2,577 Times in 926 Posts

Default

In reality, they are probably fine for most uses. But I shoot a lot of old English hammer guns and Cheddites tend to pierce on the firing pin indent way too much. then again, maybe I just have a "bad" brick on my hands. Another lot may be fine.

Then again, they are made in France... (LOL)
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 07-29-2013, 01:21 PM   #15
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

I use only Cheddite primers and one of my Parkers on the right side will pierce the primer quite often. On another reloading forum many of the guys have the same complaint when using a couple of high end guns. I believe Cheddite uses a thinner material and if your gun has a primer that reaches out a bit to far they'll pierce. Because I shoot so much, to keep the cost down I use Cheddites. But because I'm rotating between ten different SxS's that one Parker doesn't get shot too much that I believe it's getting hurt a whole lot. One of these days if I get off my lazy a** I'll shorten that one firing pin.
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Paul Harm For Your Post:
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 07-29-2013, 07:29 PM   #16
Member
Parker Bachelder (Brad's Profile)
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 296
Thanks: 177
Thanked 1,925 Times in 202 Posts

Default

Paul, I can't tell you why on a Molecular level, however I have seen this condition occur frequently on trap over and unders. The bottom barrel is fired much more often than the top barrel. Doubles, the right barrel is fired much more than the left. For whatever reason the least fired barrel tends to be prone to more atmospheric corrosion. I am farily sure it has to do with heat and compression of the steel. Just an observation,

Brad
Brad Bachelder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Brad Bachelder For Your Post:
Visit Brad Bachelder's homepage!
Unread 08-05-2013, 05:14 PM   #17
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

Brad, thanks for the reply. How's my 1894 Remington C grade coming ?
__________________
Paul Harm
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.