Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Restoration

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-04-2018, 08:02 PM   #11
Member
Ken Hill
PGCA Member
 
Ken Hill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 705
Thanks: 872
Thanked 714 Times in 358 Posts

Default

This question reappears often enough and the originality gun is the final consensus. It is a straight forward answer comparing a "benchmark" gun price to a gun completely restored to original specs. 50% seems like a big discount considering the craftsmanship and expense to restore a well used gun to something close to new.

Is any restoration acceptable (i.e., barrels reblued correctly or stock refinish) for adding value to the gun? A lot of people stay away from recase coloring the action.
Ken Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ken Hill For Your Post:
Unread 04-04-2018, 08:04 PM   #12
Member
mobirdhunter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Garry L Gordon's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,650
Thanks: 13,085
Thanked 9,471 Times in 3,042 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Dwyer View Post
I completely agree with Dean. A well restored gun is more difficult to sell and worth about 50% to an original
David
It sure would be informative -- and interesting -- to know what some of the higher priced restored guns actually go for. We can see this at the auction sites that post the sale price, but don't have that information from the dealers. One would think they put the price somewhere near what they think they can get. How near?

It also begs the question, is a gun's value what it sells for or what experts think it's worth? I could argue both ways...but will leave that to others.
__________________
“Every day I wonder how many things I am dead wrong about.”
― Jim Harrison
"'I promise you,' he said, 'on my word of honor, I won't die on the opening of the bird season.'" -- Robert Ruark (from The Old Man and the Boy)
Garry L Gordon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-04-2018, 08:13 PM   #13
Member
BRDHNTR
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,745
Thanks: 7,186
Thanked 2,696 Times in 1,234 Posts

Default

Time may tell a different story.. my guess is that collector grade parkers will always command top dollar but that over time, properly and correctly restored parkers will inevitably increase in value. Supply and demand will govern
allen newell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to allen newell For Your Post:
Unread 04-04-2018, 10:31 PM   #14
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,284
Thanks: 462
Thanked 3,597 Times in 1,550 Posts

Default

I must have studied too much Microeconomics in Grad school. Declining demand while supply stays the same = lower prices. Demand for our guns is declining
__________________
"Striving to become the man my dog thinks I am"
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to John Dallas For Your Post:
Unread 04-04-2018, 11:03 PM   #15
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,562
Thanks: 35,442
Thanked 33,042 Times in 12,322 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Dallas View Post
I must have studied too much Microeconomics in Grad school. Declining demand while supply stays the same = lower prices. Demand for our guns is declining

This is probably more applicable to restored guns than very high original condition guns. There are only a limited (and diminishing) number of original condition guns while the number of restored guns increases every year... month... week...

We see asking prices on very nicely restored guns but when they sell we are rarely privy to the sell price... while when a 'benchmark' gun changes hands we never even know about it sometimes for years - and the price is subject to conjecture because that is information that is rarely ever shared.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2018, 09:54 AM   #16
Member
C grade
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
David Dwyer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,387
Thanks: 4,135
Thanked 1,233 Times in 454 Posts

Default

Another factor is "restored" or "fluffed up" guns are way too often represented as all original. I have first hand knowledge of restored high grade guns going thru auction as all original and guns being represented by "reputable" dealers" as all original actually being complete restorations. I recently saw a $78,000 sale of all original Parkers latter turn out to be restored guns. This distorts the $$$ paid for what.
David
David Dwyer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to David Dwyer For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2018, 09:58 AM   #17
Member
Steve Hodges
PGCA Member
 
Stephen Hodges's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,915
Thanks: 6,107
Thanked 3,196 Times in 891 Posts

Default

This is a very interesting post. I guess it boils down to what makes you happy. A well worn but honest Parker has been used for what it was intended for or a restored version of that gun that may or may not simulate what it looked like coming out of the factory. When I first got into buying and shooting Parker's I thought the latter. I was lucky to find and purchase, at a very reasonable price, fairly rare 16 gauge ejector gun, one of 24 such guns made in its configuration. The gun showed plenty of "honest" wear but functioned perfectly. I immediately sent it off to one of the top restoration shops that we all recognize for a total, authentic restoration. The wait for the return of my prize was almost unbearable. The day it arrived I could not wait to open the box and see what a "new" Parker actually looked like. To say my reaction was total disappointment would be an understatement. Yes, the wood looked perfect, the rust bluing on the barrels was beautiful and the case colors bright and colorful. To bright and colorful. The gun looked "perfect" and yet I was totally disappointed with it. The restorer had done nothing wrong or imperfect. Not his fault. I sold that gun within a month of getting it back restored. I now like original Parker's that have mellowed with time. After all, we all have.
__________________
Daniel Webster once said ""Men hang out their signs indicative of their respective trades; shoemakers hang out a gigantic shoe; jewelers a monster watch, and the dentist hangs out a gold tooth; but in the mountains of New Hampshire, God Almighty has hung out a sign to show that there He makes men."
Stephen Hodges is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Stephen Hodges For Your Post:
Unread 04-05-2018, 10:03 AM   #18
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,768
Thanks: 580
Thanked 2,575 Times in 925 Posts

Default

The post-war American consumer/collector has always placed a premium on "new" stuff. Specifically, factory-new stuff.

If someone bought a new 1957 Chevrolet convertible and kept it in a garage for the past 61 years, collectors go nuts. Same for a 20-bore AH Parker that was purchased and never used for over 100 years.

But what's the "value" in factory-new? The Chevy was never enjoyed for what it was. And the Parker was never put to its intended use. Both are time-bound relics that no practical collector would either drive or shoot.

Give me an honest double gun that has seen use and care any day. And if it has been used to the point of distress, then restoration is justified.

The English take a different view on guns and gun maintenance. Just check Chris Batha's gun cleaning column in the current Shooting Sportsman...
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-05-2018, 11:17 AM   #19
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,550
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,422 Times in 4,595 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Hill View Post
Is any restoration acceptable (i.e., barrels reblued correctly or stock refinish) for adding value to the gun? A lot of people stay away from recase coloring the action.
Some things are maintenance more than "restoration". If the bluing is so worn that it is going to easily rust without contact oil application, then it is time to re-blue them as a form of maintenance. The same can be said about stock finish.

However, if the gun is so worn to where it actually needs these things, then it was not a high value collectors piece anyway. In these cases, the value is increases by performing these maintenance/restorative operations.

There is absolutely no reason to have to do any restoration work to a true 75-80% or better gun.

Fixing a buggard screw or something is one thing. But finish restoration is another.

Any gun truly NEEDING (say... 40% condition or less) restoration is of course going to be worth more restored than it was before. But not as much as an original gun in that same (post-restored) condition.



I tell people all the time, that very few guns are actually "worth" fully restoring from a monetary gain standpoint. You do it because you want to do it. Period. If financial gain can be had in some occasions, great.

And of course, any talk of restoration that I mention is assuming the work is top notch and completely correct. Anything less is not even worth discussing because it does de-value the gun.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 04-05-2018, 11:24 AM   #20
Member
C grade
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
David Dwyer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,387
Thanks: 4,135
Thanked 1,233 Times in 454 Posts

Default

I think Brian is correct in that maintance , touching up the stock finish, replace a bad screw. is not refinishing . The value of a restored 40% gun is, IMHO, not more that the gun was originally. First, it diminishes the number of buyers and the owner would not recover the cost of the restoration. If it makes the owner happy go for it ,but from a financial investment view it does not pay off.
David
David Dwyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.