Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Restoration

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Back bore to remove pits
Unread 06-24-2016, 12:07 AM   #1
Member
Bill Graham
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 284
Thanks: 231
Thanked 204 Times in 61 Posts

Default Back bore to remove pits

1906 VH, Vulcan steel barrels, 2 5/8"chambers, very good barrel exterior condition, and a number of deep looking pits in the bores.

Took measurements tonight with a Dave Manson bore wall thickness gauge (not extremely precise) and came up with the readings in the pictures. Does it look like I have enough meat to ream the bores some and still be within safe ranges, or is this barrel scrap? I cannot afford to sleeve the barrels, and it wouldn't be worth the expense anyway if I could.

Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1533.jpg (68.4 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1534.jpg (64.2 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1535.jpg (62.1 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1536.jpg (61.8 KB, 6 views)
Bill Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2016, 03:25 AM   #2
Member
tom tutwiler
Forum Associate
 
tom tutwiler's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 675
Thanks: 393
Thanked 743 Times in 223 Posts

Default

IMO it depends where those pits are. If they well towards the breech, perhaps. If they are half way or further down the barrels I'd say they are toast. That said, a bunch of smart folks will chime in who no doubt have more experience then I do for sure.
tom tutwiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2016, 01:01 PM   #3
Member
Bill Graham
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 284
Thanks: 231
Thanked 204 Times in 61 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom tutwiler View Post
IMO it depends where those pits are.
The worst two are:

4" from from breech, 12 o'clock, right barrel.
2" from muzzle, 10 o'clock, left barrel.

The right barrel is the worse of the two overall, and both are littered with small ones along the entire length. I'm guessing corrosive ammo, and years of sitting uncleaned.
Bill Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2016, 01:08 PM   #4
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,806
Thanks: 1,644
Thanked 8,150 Times in 3,258 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Graham View Post
The worst two are:

4" from from breach, 12 o'clock, right barrel.
2" from muzzle, 10 o'clock, left barrel.

The right barrel is the worse of the two overall, and both are littered with small ones along the entire length. I'm guessing corrosive ammo, and years of sitting uncleaned.

as far as ammo goes--
black powder gets a bad rap for pitting- but IMHO - the corrosive primers used in the early days ( up to around WWII in some ammo) is the primary culprit
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 06-24-2016, 06:04 AM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,578
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,516 Times in 4,619 Posts

Default

Pitting always looks worse than it is when you are looking down the bore. Because you are looking across the pit. Not at it dorectly the Surface.

If used properly, a manson gauge will provide you with accurate measurements for wall thickness. But the large ball end on it does not allow you to measure how deep the pitting actually is. A hosford gauge is much better for this.

The measurements you have listed on the barrels look to be perfectly normal for most barrel sets. I would not call the barrels junk too quickly. At least from a shooter standpoint.

I would not recommend any backboring. You would be throwing money at something that is just going to compromise the integrity of the barrels. Yes, pitting looks bad, bit it usually does not effect the shootabiltiy of a set of barrels.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 06-24-2016, 07:17 AM   #6
Member
Daniel G Rainey
Forum Associate
 
Daniel G Rainey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 547
Thanks: 986
Thanked 451 Times in 180 Posts

Default

Pitting does not usually effect the shootabiltiy. I learn something from the site all the time. But, does pitting effect the pattern the the gun?
Daniel G Rainey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2016, 08:04 AM   #7
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,578
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,516 Times in 4,619 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel G Rainey View Post
Pitting does not usually effect the shootabiltiy. I learn something from the site all the time. But, does pitting effect the pattern the the gun?


How would it with a shot cup?
And when i say that pitting does not effect shootability. I mean safe shootability... And pitting that is typical of these older guns. How many of us are shooting hammer guns with moderate or even heavy pitting?
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 06-24-2016, 12:53 PM   #8
Member
Bill Graham
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 284
Thanks: 231
Thanked 204 Times in 61 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Dudley View Post
when i say that pitting does not effect shootability. I mean safe shootability... And pitting that is typical of these older guns. How many of us are shooting hammer guns with moderate or even heavy pitting?
That's all I care about; safe shootability. I shot it once, and it hit what I aimed at.

I'm fine as well with not back boring. It wouldn't cost me anything to have it done, but if I don't need to then I wouldn't want to. It would be nice however to lengthen the chambers to 2 3/4. I can easily buy Winchester WinLite shells right down the street, and they are a very mellow load.
Bill Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-24-2016, 01:01 PM   #9
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,806
Thanks: 1,644
Thanked 8,150 Times in 3,258 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Graham View Post
It would be nice however to lengthen the chambers to 2 3/4. I can easily buy Winchester WinLite shells right down the street, which would be easier than mailorder.
if there is any operation where wall thickness is most affected- this is it
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rick Losey For Your Post:
Unread 06-24-2016, 01:05 PM   #10
Member
Bill Graham
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 284
Thanks: 231
Thanked 204 Times in 61 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Losey View Post
if there is any operation where wall thickness is most affected- this is it
Nevermind that idea then. I'll order short shells online. Thanks.

Time to strike, polish, and blacken. Will leave the rest well enough alone.
Bill Graham is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.