Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 07-12-2019, 07:35 AM   #21
Member
Ron Scott
Forum Associate
 
Ronald Scott's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 202
Thanks: 188
Thanked 340 Times in 98 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
I'll have to measure the chamber length in my ejector Sterlingworth 28" with .043" of choke in the left barrel.

I just checked - the chamber length is 2 5/8" which is correct for 2 3/4" shells.
You have to wonder why they make it so confusing. A loaded 2 3/4" shell is actually 2 1/4" long -- if it's a folded crimp, after it's fired it measures just under 2 5/8"

So why are they called 2 3/4" shells?

What average joe hunter would think it's ok to fire 2 3/4" shells in a gun with a 2 5/8" chamber?

If the gun with 2 5/8" chambers had the chamber length marked on the barrel would it say 2 5/8" or 2 3/4"?

The first picture from left to right:

loaded 2 3/4" 28 ga, fired 2 3/4" 28 ga, loaded 2 3/4" 20 ga, loaded 3" 12 ga, loaded 2 3/4" 12 ga, fired 2 3/4" 12 gauge

Second picture:

fired 2 3/4" 20 ga measures 2.618" (just under 2 5/8")
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3523.jpg (529.1 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3524.jpg (504.4 KB, 1 views)
Ronald Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ronald Scott For Your Post:
Unread 07-12-2019, 08:25 AM   #22
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,557
Thanks: 35,430
Thanked 33,039 Times in 12,321 Posts

Default

Ron, not all shells of the same gauge are exactly the same length when fired.

“Average Joe hunter” needs to familiarize himself with chamber length and barrel wall thickness and the type of ammo he thinks he can use in these classic old doubles. If that’s too much trouble for him, he really has no business shooting classic old doubles.

A 2 5/8” chamber was made to shoot 2 3/4” shells. The shell when fired, would open about 1/8” into the forcing cone. The belief was that this would provide a better gas seal.

I also have 20 gauge Parkers with 2 3/8” chambers that were made to shoot 2 1/2” shells.

There is also a ‘stretch’ factor in plastic shells and none of the modern plastic shells were manufactured with the requirements of our classic old doubles.



.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-12-2019, 11:10 AM   #23
Member
Researcher
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Noreen's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,595
Thanks: 1,616
Thanked 7,770 Times in 2,351 Posts

Default

Apparently, the SAAMI meeting where it was "suggested" that our manufacturers begin marking the chamber length on their shotguns was in 1937, and we begin seeing such markings on 1938 or 39 guns. Some examples from Remington autoloaders, August 1935 --

16-gauge Sportsman Skeet Gun 01 Aug 1935.jpg

May 1937 --

11858 02 May 1937.jpg

April 1943 --

484375 02 April 1943.jpg
Dave Noreen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave Noreen For Your Post:
Unread 07-12-2019, 06:33 PM   #24
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,084
Thanks: 323
Thanked 3,761 Times in 1,245 Posts

Default

What Dave said.
A.P. Curtis published an article in the March 1938 American Rifleman entitled “Advantages of Short Shotgun Chambers” (courtesy of Larry Brown):
SAAMI, assembled in serious conference on March 26, 1937, passed the following resolution: “That an appropriate warning label be placed on all boxes containing smokeless powder shells, cautioning the consumer against using them in short chambered guns and also in guns with Damascus barrels and guns not in first-class condition.” The motion was made and seconded by representatives of two powder companies.
That same conference also passed a resolution requiring: “That all guns be marked so that the consumer will be able to tell the chamber length, as for example by marking 2 3/4 inch chamber etc.”

Hunter Arms lengthened the 20 gauge chambers from 2 1/2" to 2 3/4" in 1936.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 07-12-2019, 09:28 PM   #25
Member
Ron Scott
Forum Associate
 
Ronald Scott's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 202
Thanks: 188
Thanked 340 Times in 98 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
A 2 5/8” chamber was made to shoot 2 3/4” shells. The shell when fired, would open about 1/8” into the forcing cone. The belief was that this would provide a better gas seal.
Dean -- if a 2 3/4" shell actually measures 2 1/4" (see my picture in post above) and when fired measure less than 2 5/8" (see second photo) how does it "open about 1/8" into the forcing cone?"

By my measurements the fired case doesn't even reach the forcing cone. So there is no way they could create a better gas seal. Maybe loaded roll crimp cartridges are longer than loaded folded crimp cartridges? I don't have any to measure.
Ronald Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-12-2019, 09:54 PM   #26
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,557
Thanks: 35,430
Thanked 33,039 Times in 12,321 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Scott View Post
Dean -- if a 2 3/4" shell actually measures 2 1/4" (see my picture in post above) and when fired measure less than 2 5/8" (see second photo) how does it "open about 1/8" into the forcing cone?"

By my measurements the fired case doesn't even reach the forcing cone. So there is no way they could create a better gas seal. Maybe loaded roll crimp cartridges are longer than loaded folded crimp cartridges? I don't have any to measure.
Ron, you're missing one basic fact... These guns were built to the specifications of paper shotshell casings manufactured (cut) to specific lengths. All of the ammunition manufacturers (and there were far, far fewer then than there are today) adhered to specific measurements for paper shotshells.

We can't compare apples to oranges as in shotshells manufactured in the latter half of the 19th century and early 20th century and those manufactured today.

By the way, and please correct me if I'm wrong, the only shells in your picture of six that appear to be factory new are the two in the center.... the other four appear to be reloads.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-13-2019, 12:07 AM   #27
Member
Scott Chapman
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 120
Thanks: 81
Thanked 222 Times in 49 Posts

Default

Here is something that has been posted before. Scroll to about page 15 or so. The rest of the reading is pretty cool, too!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit
Scott Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scott Chapman For Your Post:
Unread 07-13-2019, 05:33 AM   #28
Member
Ron Scott
Forum Associate
 
Ronald Scott's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 202
Thanks: 188
Thanked 340 Times in 98 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Romig View Post
Ron, you're missing one basic fact... These guns were built to the specifications of paper shotshell casings manufactured (cut) to specific lengths. All of the ammunition manufacturers (and there were far, far fewer then than there are today) adhered to specific measurements for paper shotshells.

We can't compare apples to oranges as in shotshells manufactured in the latter half of the 19th century and early 20th century and those manufactured today.
I don't believe I'm missing the point -- I made that very point in my last sentence about roll crimped cartridges. I totally understand the difference between modern manufactured plastic hulls and the older paper shells.

Regardless of the material used, the cartridge has one length when loaded (roll crimp or folded) and a longer length after it has been fired. Although I read about the 1/8" into the forcing cone theory in the article Scott Chapman provided a link to interesting it doesn't make sense to me. The paper hull obviously has a certain thickness and if it is not allowed to open fully (because it is 1/8" into the forcing cone) the wad and shot column would get squeezed down to a smaller diameter before entering the bore. How can that possibly be a good thing? To me the ideal would be for the cartridge to open fully in the chamber allowing the wad and shot to enter the bore without any constriction. Obviously the chamber length can't be so long that gas can escape around the wad. The other factor is the chamber diameter and hull thickness -- I would think the prefect situation would be to have the inside diameter of the hull (after being expanded by the gas pressure) be the same as the bore diameter -- that way the wad and shot column could make a smooth transition from the hull into the bore -- a difficult task since hulls don't all have the same wall thickness.

Check out this illustration, esp (c) showing the expanding gasses escaping past the squeezed down wad and shot column (caused by the hull opening into the forcing cone):
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capture.JPG (129.6 KB, 5 views)
Ronald Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ronald Scott For Your Post:
Unread 07-13-2019, 05:43 AM   #29
Member
Ron Scott
Forum Associate
 
Ronald Scott's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 202
Thanks: 188
Thanked 340 Times in 98 Posts

Default

Here is the source of the attachment above:

https://books.google.com/books?id=in...page&q&f=false
Ronald Scott is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ronald Scott For Your Post:
Unread 07-13-2019, 07:48 AM   #30
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,557
Thanks: 35,430
Thanked 33,039 Times in 12,321 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Chapman View Post
Here is something that has been posted before. Scroll to about page 15 or so. The rest of the reading is pretty cool, too!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit

May we know the author of this work of compilation?
We see the names of a few of our PGCA friends so can we presume this was compiled by Dr. Drew Hause?





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.