|
06-25-2019, 03:23 PM | #43 | ||||||
|
That was super unclear...it is the part of the top lever.
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
||||||
06-25-2019, 03:27 PM | #44 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Are top levers frame specific??
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
|||||||
06-26-2019, 10:34 AM | #45 | ||||||
|
Have someone repair the original broken part.
|
||||||
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark Beasland For Your Post: |
06-26-2019, 03:29 PM | #46 | ||||||
|
It may well come to that, but Merrington has concerns over the quality of the steel in the original part. In the attached photos you can see that it is very crystalline, almost like what I used to call "pot metal". It is easy to see why the lever design was changed, that little piece that broke off is put to considerable mechanical strain, and I can see how easily it could be compromised.
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
||||||
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mark Ray For Your Post: |
06-26-2019, 05:15 PM | #47 | ||||||
|
Mark I'll look again
|
||||||
06-26-2019, 07:43 PM | #48 | ||||||
|
Mark.
That is NOT the early style lever. That is the late (post 1910) lever. As you said, your gun serial numbers to after 1910.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
06-26-2019, 08:13 PM | #49 | ||||||
|
I’m confused then Brian. You say the top lever in your photograph is the “early” style, and mine is identical.
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
||||||
06-26-2019, 08:33 PM | #50 | ||||||
|
Additionally, my gun has v spring, and no coil spring.
__________________
" I love the look Hobbs, my Vizsla, gives me after my second miss in a row." |
||||||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|