Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-27-2021, 12:42 PM   #11
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 3,347
Thanked 6,312 Times in 1,219 Posts

Default

Karl, if you only need a box or two for hunting maybe one of the gents who bought RST 16’s while at the VGC a weekend ago will sell you some? Of course they must be shipped by UPS or FedEx with an ammo sticker, NOT USPS.
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 09-27-2021, 12:42 PM   #12
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,092
Thanks: 324
Thanked 3,788 Times in 1,251 Posts

Default

Karl: what, exactly, is the chamber length?
Using long shells in short chambers will raise the pressure.
Bells' study was 12g and the increase ranged from about 400 psi to 1200 psi.
It is here about 1/3 way down
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...vwLYc-kGA/edit
I am not aware of any study of modern 16g or 20g shells.

And if the mouth of the shell enters the forcing cone, recoil will be increased.

We've had this discussion on the 16 gauge site, and a fella did some dumpster diving and measured the spent shell length of several brands. He reported that the Fiocchi shells were shorter than 2 3/4".
Possibly someone could measure some empties and report?
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 09-27-2021, 03:03 PM   #13
Member
classicioi
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 303
Thanks: 1,224
Thanked 241 Times in 102 Posts

Default

Drew, Using the Galazan chamber gauge it measures slightly less than 2 1/2".
Karl Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-27-2021, 04:36 PM   #14
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,092
Thanks: 324
Thanked 3,788 Times in 1,251 Posts

Default

Thank you Karl, and that matters.
You have a wonderful lightweight gun, and I would use shells dimensionally and ballistically similar to those for which Parker Bros. designed the gun. I don't think we are any smarter than they were, now 100 years later
In the 1920s that would have been a 2 9/16" shell, 1 oz. shot, and 2 1/2 Dram Equivalent of Bulk Smokeless at 1165 fps at about 7000 psi, or Dense Smokeless at about 8000 psi.
For targets, 3/4 oz. are delightful.
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Unread 09-27-2021, 10:44 PM   #15
Member
Chris Robenalt
PGCA Member
 
Chris Robenalt's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 603
Thanks: 1,636
Thanked 1,061 Times in 283 Posts

Default

Karl, if you really want a nice 2 1/2" low psi shell, reach out to Dave Moore, send him a pm. He's not only a PGCA member, he's also an owner of the William Larkin Moore fine gun shop here in Scottsdale, AZ. We buy and shoot their shells, exclusively made for their business.

Chris, AZ
Chris Robenalt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chris Robenalt For Your Post:
Unread 09-28-2021, 06:48 AM   #16
Member
Mike of the Mountain
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,776
Thanks: 15,590
Thanked 8,898 Times in 2,687 Posts

Default

Karl, start saving your empty hulls and roll your own. If you need to use 2 1/2” keep 2 3/4” and cut them down. There are a few jigs available that will work just fine to make “short shells”. Add a MEC press with a short kit and components from Ballistic Products and you will have a plentiful supply of 16g. Throw in the factory RST hulls and you’ll be happy as a clam, if clams can be happy.
Mike Koneski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mike Koneski For Your Post:
Visit Mike Koneski's homepage!
Unread 09-28-2021, 08:05 AM   #17
Member
Cold Spring
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,902
Thanks: 3,347
Thanked 6,312 Times in 1,219 Posts

Default

I'll spin a tale here to underscore my high opinion of the RST 7/8 ounce 16-gauge Falcon Lites. Some years ago when the Vintage Cup was at Pintail Point I bought a VH 16 30" gun while at the event. Choked I-Mod & Full. I was itching to shoot the gun and went over to RST looking for 1-ounce loads to do the 16 gauge American Classic event. Morris told me about his then new 7/8 ounce Falcon Lites and at first I was skeptical; I was a serious sporting clays shooter and always felt the more pellets in the air, the better. He gave me two boxes plus a few extra shells in case of trap malfunctions and asked for my feedback after finishing the course. I'd never shot that Parker before - no practice shots - and ended up 3rd place in the event against something like 60 shooters and with a score of 45 ex 50 as I recall. Anyway, since then I've almost exclusively used that 7/8 ounce 1125 speed shell for 16b clays, grouse and woodcock. Yep I'll have a few heavier shells loaded with 6's and 4's in the vest in case I run into pheasants or turkeys while out in the covers.

I traded off that 16 VH 30" a few years later and always regretted it. She just seemed right whenever I shot her. Then at the VGC two weeks ago I found another 16 VH 30" and bought the gun. Again it's choked I-Mod & Full. I didn't have any 16 gauge shells with me but couldn't wait to shoot the Parker and RST obliged with a box of Falcon Lites in 7-1/2 shot. Joined up with two friends shooting the woods course and broke 24 ex 25, again the first time I shot the new to me Parker. Brought back memories of that day at Pintail Point.

Those 7/8 ounce 16 gauge RST's rock!
Frank Srebro is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Srebro For Your Post:
Unread 09-28-2021, 08:48 AM   #18
Member
Randy Roberts
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Randy G Roberts's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,919
Thanks: 4,469
Thanked 5,667 Times in 1,860 Posts

Default

I am with Frank on this one concerning the RST loads. I do use their 1 oz loads for Phez but I greatly prefer the 7/8 load for targets. Recoil is low, easy on me and my Parkers. All of my 16's are tightly choked so the loss of 1/8 oz of shot really matters not. I purchased 2 flats of the 1 oz 8's some time ago for targets, when they are gone I will not buy them again unless it's the only game in town. Good luck Karl !
Randy G Roberts is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Randy G Roberts For Your Post:
Unread 09-28-2021, 03:24 PM   #19
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,614 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Referring to the citations in Dr Drews comment , I did not find the increase he stated. I did find the statement that the increase for shooting a 23/4 cartridge in a 21/2 chamber would be less than 1000psi. Another Sherman Bell DGJ article says 3 to 5 percent. For a 10,000 psi load, that is 300 to 500 psi.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg D3972C4E-CFAD-4707-8D91-944C0A2A67B5.jpg (540.1 KB, 2 views)
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 09-28-2021, 04:08 PM   #20
Member
Drew Hause
Forum Associate
 
Drew Hause's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,092
Thanks: 324
Thanked 3,788 Times in 1,251 Posts

Default

“Long Shells in Short Chambers”, Sherman Bell with technical assistance from Tom Armbrust in “Finding Out for Myself” Part V, Double Gun Journal, Winter 2001
The test barrel was a ‘heavy’ Krieger barrel with piezo-electric transducer at 1” from the breech and an Oehler velocity gauge 2 5/16” from the breech.
Tests performed:
1. 2 1/2” chamber with a 7/16” forcing cone – “British chamber” (BC)
2. 2 1/2” chamber with a 1 1/4” forcing cone – “Modified British chamber”
(MBC)
3. 2 3/4” chamber with a 1” forcing cone – “American Chamber” (AC)
Each load was tested in each chamber at least 5 times.
No significant change in velocity was noted between the 3 test chambers
It was not unusual to have 300-600 psi spread between shots

2 3/4” 12 GAUGE LOADS
1. 7/8 oz. in Federal plastic hull at 1185 fps (measured in the 2 3/4” chamber)
2. 7/8 oz. in Estate plastic hull at 1206 fps
3. 1 oz. in Federal paper hull at 1137 fps
4. 1 1/8 oz. in Federal paper hull at 1120 fps
5. 1 oz. in Remington plastic hull at 1205 fps
6. 1 1/8 oz. in Winchester plastic hull at 1186 fps
7. 1 1/4 oz. in Federal plastic hull at 1091 fps
8. 1 1/4 oz. in Winchester plastic hull at 1136 fps
9. 1 1/8 oz. with GOEX FFFg in Federal paper at 1184 fps
10. 1 1/8 oz. Bismuth in Federal plastic at 1091 fps

……..BC…..….MBC…....AC…...Difference BC vs AC
1…..5725…..….5905…....4834……891 psi
2…..6225…..….6065…....5009……1216 psi
3…..5865…..….5325…....5263……602 psi…..“long cones do reduce pressure”
4…..5845…..….5665…....5058……787 psi
5…..7805…..….7845…....7577……228 psi
6…..11,125..….11,045..…10,787….338 psi
7…..6892…..….6805…....5953……939 psi
8…..8765…..….8545…....7870……895 psi
9…..5405…..….5265…....4603……802 psi
10…6765…..….6365..…..6380……385 psi

Average difference of the 10 loads is about 700 psi.

Two 3” loads were tested in the BC barrel; one resulted in a pressure increase of 1442 psi.

Interpretation and caution:
1. Results in light British 12b or American small bore barrels may be different.
2. Results in YOUR barrel would require drilling the chamber for the transducer thereby destroying your gun.
3. Paper hulls with star crimps showed little difference compared to plastic hulls.
NO roll crimp paper hulls were tested.
4. The increase in pressure comparing 1 oz., 1 1/8 oz., and 1 1/4 oz. loads was similar.
5. Longer cones MAY reduce pressure. This was NOT a comparison of standard 1” with 2 1/2” cones however.
6. “Shooting 2 3/4” shells in 2 1/2” chambers does make them produce more pressure-but in most cases it is less than a 1000 psi increase. I see no reason, related to safety, to modify an original 2 1/2” chambered gun to shoot 2 3/4” shells, if the 2 3/4” load you intend to use would develop pressure that is safe in that gun, when fired in a standard chamber!”
7. “We found that lengthening the forcing cone in a 2 1/2” chamber usually helps mitigate the pressure increase that comes from shooting 2 3/4” or 3” shells in the short chamber.”
8. “Shooting heavy 2 3/4” loads in a light gun is a dumb thing to do. Shooting 3” magnum duck loads is even dumber.”
9. This is not a study of the effect on RECOIL of shooting long shells in short chambers.


As said, I am not aware of any study of modern 16g or 20g 2 3/4" loads, both of which tend to run higher pressures than 12g, in shorter chambers.

Last edited by Drew Hause; 09-28-2021 at 04:54 PM..
Drew Hause is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drew Hause For Your Post:
Visit Drew Hause's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.