Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Reproductions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
CSM .410 barrels vs. Dove
Unread 09-04-2012, 03:36 PM   #1
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default CSM .410 barrels vs. Dove

I had the Repro with the CSM .410 barrels out for the Yuma openner on dove. The full/full choked barrels accounted for 10 whitewings in the morning and about 20 high flying (some really high) Eurasian collared dove in the afternoon.

I used 7 1/2 shot on the whitewings and some 6 shot 3" shells on the high flying Eurasians after noting that the 7 1/2s were not cutting it.

I think I'm really pleased with the gun as a .410. Although, I did find the chambers a little tight and the extractor rods could stand to be trimmed a bit to ensure the gun doesn't close on the rims. I'll get on that this week. I have a new reamer and I want to put long cones in this one too.

Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Heald For Your Post:
Unread 09-04-2012, 04:13 PM   #2
Member
George M. Purtill Member #28
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
George M. Purtill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,342
Thanks: 2,039
Thanked 2,291 Times in 861 Posts

Default

what a sweet thing!!
George M. Purtill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-04-2012, 04:49 PM   #3
Member
Joe Bernfeld
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 297
Thanks: 24
Thanked 76 Times in 43 Posts

Default

30 doves in a day. You must really like to eat doves !
Joe Bernfeld is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-04-2012, 06:55 PM   #4
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,795 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

wish my stevens 410 looked that good...i may try it on doves at my next outing...glad your barrels worked out you have a great looking gun...and it must shoot good too... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-04-2012, 09:56 PM   #5
Member
GH-16
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,002
Thanks: 5,149
Thanked 1,304 Times in 445 Posts

Default

Very nice !!! You really lucked out with your CSMC barrels. This makes a very nice & unique repro. for sure.

I'm glad it all worked out for you!!!!
Paul Ehlers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-04-2012, 09:58 PM   #6
Member
Pittypatdugan
PGCA Member
 
Pat Dugan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 458
Thanks: 15
Thanked 170 Times in 98 Posts

Default

please let me know if "extractor rods could stand to be trimmed a bit" works out ok

Thanks

Pat
Pat Dugan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-05-2012, 01:18 PM   #7
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default

Pat,
Will do.

My thoughts on this issue are: when the gun is fired and the shells ejected, the ejectors are in the "ejected" or "tripped" position. The extractors are pushed out about another 1/16"-1/8" further when in the ejected position than when the ejectors are cocked (closing the gun cocks the ejectors) and then the gun openned again.

When new cartridges inserted in the gun after firing, the tripped ejectors push the extractor rods out more and cause the rims of the shells to hang up on the breachface, unless pressure is put on the shell heads upon closing, or if the gun is fired, openned to eject, closed, and openned again, then loaded. I'll get on this soon, since it's a real pain in the field but soon forgotten if I don't do it right away.
Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-06-2012, 01:29 AM   #8
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default

Pat,
I recut the chambers and cut the long cones tonight. It seems to have cured all the problems. I'll have to check it some more and shoot it this weekend. I still need to polish the cones and chambers. But I didn't shorten the extractors.
Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-06-2012, 10:28 PM   #9
Member
C.O.B.
Forum Associate
 
Rich Anderson's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,072
Thanks: 2,217
Thanked 6,320 Times in 2,082 Posts

Default

You said it was F/F, do you know what the actual constrictions are? I have a CSM Fox 410 that is .022 & .023 which equate to extra full and ridiculously full.
Rich Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-07-2012, 01:03 AM   #10
Member
Chuck Heald
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 422
Thanks: 24
Thanked 172 Times in 77 Posts

Default

Rich,
The chokes are .017/.017". When I ordered the barrels, they were listed as being available in IC/Mod as I recall. I simply asked if they would leave them full/full. Carol wrote it on the order card and said "maybe". When they came in, they were as asked. I do wish they were .020/.020, but the long cones I just cut yesterday and polished for the last few hours will tighten it up further. The pattern board will tell.
Chuck Heald is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.