Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums Parker Hammer Guns

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Another Parker Hammer TL
Unread 10-25-2010, 12:21 AM   #1
Member
Anthony Christensen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post

Default Another Parker Hammer TL

Hello,

Believe that this S/N 47950 Parker Hammer Top Lever shotgun has the following characteristics based on researching information in the Serialization book loaned to me by my gunsmith plus information contained on the PGCA web site:
Frame Size 2
Weight 5 lbs 2 oz
Grade no marking - grade 0
Barrel length is 32 inches as measured and they therefore are full length
Barrels are Twist
12 Ga
No extras
Serial number assigned in 1886. Next to last S/N in series per web site.86 Parker TL Overall 018.jpg

86 Parker TL Left Side 003.jpg

86 Parker TL Right Side 020.jpg

86 Parker TL Watertable 016.jpg

86 Parker TL Bbl Marks adn Extractor 014.jpg

86 Parker TL Bbl Lug and Extractor 013.jpg

86 Parker TL Forend 011.jpg

86 Parker TL Cracked Butt Plate 009.jpg

86 Parker TL Underside 005.jpg
Straight stock
Original butt plate but cracked and repaired with extra retaining screw.

It seems to be a standard production grade 12 Ga Parker with all the standard markings and features for the time frame in which it was built.

I would appreciate any information that confirms or updates my assessment and understanding of the data in the sources mentioned above.
Yes, the hammer screws and hammers have been welded. As I recall the conversation in the mid-1970s, my Dad and his gunsmith family friend did not want the shotgun to be able to be fired with modern loads.
This shotgun was owned by my Grandfather. Believe that he obtained it while he was in Utah.

The fit of this shotgun is tight in getting it lined up to reassemble and then closing the action. I am tempted to compare it favorably with my field grade Browning 525 over and under, its just not so shiny.

Hope the large amount of picture data attached does not bog down this communication.

Thank you in advance for any feedback.

Regards,

Tony C
Anthony Christensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-25-2010, 11:45 AM   #2
Member
George Lander
Forum Associate
 
George Lander's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 2,852
Thanked 728 Times in 379 Posts

Default

Anthony: You have a fine old Parker in what appears to be very decent original condition. Please do not attempt to refinish the metal or the wood. Join the PGCA & order a letter ($40.00) and get the history on your great gun.

Best Regards, George
George Lander is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-25-2010, 12:37 PM   #3
Member
Anthony Christensen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post

Default

George, thank you for the rapid reply. Although I am not a serious collector of firearms, I do understand a bit about original condition. My gunsmith friend is a member of the Colorado Gun Collectors Association and has shared information in his effort to educate me. He will help prevent me from doing something unwise.
I have the request for a research letter form printed up. Joining PGCA and requesting a letter looks like a great deal. You get the full course meal, not just a drink and salad so to speak. Besides that, supporting an excellent historical preservation organization is also a good thing.
Thanks.

Tony
Anthony Christensen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Anthony Christensen For Your Post:
Unread 10-25-2010, 01:30 PM   #4
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,563
Thanks: 35,444
Thanked 33,042 Times in 12,322 Posts

Default

Anthony, we all applaud your support and your fine motives in doing so and we welcome you openly to our PGCA family.

Dean
Dean Romig is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-25-2010, 01:49 PM   #5
Member
Roundsworth
PGCA Member
 
Mark Landskov's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,452
Thanks: 1,513
Thanked 561 Times in 311 Posts

Default

Provided everything else is in working order, Brad Bachelder could undo the welding and restore the locks for proper function, while maintaining the aged appearance.
__________________
GMC(SW)-USN, Retired
'Earnest Will'
'Desert Shield'
'Desert Storm'
'Southern Watch'
Mark Landskov is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-26-2010, 05:56 PM   #6
Member
David Hamilton
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 289
Thanks: 290
Thanked 75 Times in 56 Posts

Default

Do the hammers work? The welding should prevent cocking the hammers? The weight, 5 lbs 2 ounces, is the un-struck weight of the barrels before they were finished. We shoot guns like yours all the time. Check it out it may be fine to shoot, particularly with those massive barrels. That is very heavy for a 12 gauge. Have you tried a 10 gauge shell in the chambers? David
David Hamilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-26-2010, 10:08 PM   #7
Member
Anthony Christensen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post

Default

The hammers do not work. At least they do not cock readily and I do not intend to apply brute force. I don't know if anything was done internally to the lock mechanism. All the screws on this Parker show use-abuse as they all have slot deformation to varying degrees.
Based on your question, I dug out a 12 Ga A-Zoom snap cap. The fit in the chambers is very sloppy, maybe as much as a 1/16th inch sloppy! A 12 Ga snap cap rattles around!
Is there a dimension for the breach diameter that I could check with a caliper to verify the 10 Ga chambers?
If this Parker is a 10 Ga which it now appears to be, then the Parker Gun Serialization book has a data entry error for S/N 47950 on page 202.
The request for a PGCA research letter and the check went into the mail today.

Tony
Anthony Christensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-27-2010, 08:55 AM   #8
Member
Double Play
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Larry Frey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,303
Thanks: 925
Thanked 2,770 Times in 635 Posts

Default

Tony,
If it is a 10 gage as it appears then a couple of things may have occurred. Either the entry was incorrect which I doubt as your gun was produced in a batch of 19 same grade/gage guns which was typical of PB gun manufacturing practices at that time or perhaps the gun was returned for a set of 10 gage barrels which was a service also offered by PB. Let’s hope the PGCA letter you sent for can shed some light on this question.
Larry Frey is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-27-2010, 03:03 PM   #9
Member
Anthony Christensen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post

Default

First, please delete all previous comments about S/N 47950 being a 10 Ga shotgun. It was my check procedure that was sloppy. I did not remove the barrels from the action and remove the extractor. Therefore, the snap cap was not fully chambered since it was engaged with and stopped by the extractor.

Second, I apologize for any confusion my comments may have caused.

With the extractor removed, both 12 Ga Winchester and Remington shells fit well.
Although I do not have any 10 Ga shells to use as a check, it appears that there is not chamber clearance enough for a 10 Ga shell to be chambered.
Actually, I am not at all familiar with the 10 Ga shell size or any other of its characteristics.
The 12 Ga A-Zoom snap cap seems to be a reasonable check tool as its base diameter matches the base diameters of the Winchester and Remington shells within .002 inch. The snap cap forward section is round with a diameter very similar to the factory shells. The plastic section of the factory shells is not quite round but both chamber fine in both barrels.

Also, please ignore the comment that the Parker Gun Serialization book might have a data entry error on page 202.

TC
Anthony Christensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-27-2010, 03:13 PM   #10
Member
Anthony Christensen
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 1 Post

Default

A question on ammunition circa 1886-87 vs now.
What was the standard shotgun shell construction utilized in the 1886-87 time frame?
Brass, paper with metal base, or?

Another question, this one related to manufacturing tolerances.
Would the 1886-87 standard practice 12 Ga shotgun barrel chamber production process result in a generous tolerance allowance for the shell compared to today's shotguns?

Tony C
Anthony Christensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.