|
10-16-2011, 02:17 AM | #3 | ||||||
|
1st rule, post pictures. No seller should object to you taking a few innocents pic's.
|
||||||
10-16-2011, 05:45 PM | #4 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
10-16-2011, 05:56 PM | #5 | |||||||
|
Quote:
I'm picking up my GH tomorrow. I'd have that Trojan in a heart beat if I had not just sprung a G for the GH, which I think is a neater gun. However I see on the various gun sales sites some pretty inexpensive GH guns about like mine; like $1500. I've also seen some Trojans for $3K, but they looked better than this one. I'm looking forward to posting pics of my GH and getting you guys' opinons of it. I guess Parker started making the Trojan in the teens, which means it was/is comparable to the Sterlingworth. Am I correct? |
|||||||
10-16-2011, 09:30 PM | #6 | ||||||
|
It sounds like a 4- 6 hundred dollar Parker. Asa Kelley saw one in a local pawn shop that was at most a 100 parts gun that the owner said was valued at 1100 dollars by the blue book, so be very carefull
PDD |
||||||
10-17-2011, 07:30 AM | #7 | ||||||
|
Yeah, book value on a Trojan in poor condition is $600. And if it is very rough, anything over that would not really be a good buy. But without seeing it and taking it all in, it is hard to say. If it is just surface rist, that could be cleaned up fairly well.
The Sterlingworths are pretty much on par with the lower grade Parkers, but I would say more with the V grades. The level of finish on the sterlingworths is nicer than the Trojans. However a Sterlingworth will usually always be priced lower than a comparable Parker.
__________________
B. Dudley |
||||||
10-17-2011, 12:39 PM | #8 | |||||||
|
Quote:
Steve |
|||||||
|
|