Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
16ga PH with Round Grip
Unread 03-03-2022, 11:15 PM   #1
Member
Adam Steinquist
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 15
Thanks: 29
Thanked 13 Times in 4 Posts

Default 16ga PH with Round Grip

Hi all,

I'm hoping that someone can help take a look at these photos and tell me about the buttstock. The gun is a 1892 16 gauge PH on a Zero frame with 2.15 weight barrels. The stock is 14.5" LOP, 1-1/4" DAC and 2-3/4" DAH

The seller told me that someone who is knowledgeable in these things looked at the stock and told him it was original, but I haven't seen other guns of this era that look quite the same - I think it's the checkering pattern and the high DAC (1-1/4") that are making me wonder.

Also, it looks like one of the screws on the left side of the gun is a replacement and isn't flush with the body- should this worry me? Also, the forend needs work as it was shortened after a previous breakage and is missing it's metal tip. I just want to know what I'm getting myself into if I move forward with this gun. I'm mostly looking to hunt and bust clays with it, but want to make sure I'm not throwing my money away and/or buying a money pit.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Resized_20220302_144806.jpg (547.6 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg Resized_20220302_150222.jpg (539.9 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg Resized952022030295144631.jpg (292.1 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg Resized952022030295144644.jpg (523.0 KB, 23 views)
File Type: jpg Resized952022030295144657.jpg (539.3 KB, 18 views)
Adam Steinquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-04-2022, 05:45 AM   #2
Member
chris dawe
PGCA Member
 
chris dawe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,173
Thanks: 2,581
Thanked 2,784 Times in 602 Posts

Default

Not original
chris dawe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chris dawe For Your Post:
Unread 03-04-2022, 06:30 AM   #3
Member
Aaron Beck
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 298
Thanks: 52
Thanked 197 Times in 120 Posts

Default

That particular gun has very thin barrels back by the chambers. Would advise caution.
Aaron Beck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aaron Beck For Your Post:
Unread 03-04-2022, 11:22 AM   #4
Member
Adam Steinquist
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 15
Thanks: 29
Thanked 13 Times in 4 Posts

Default

Thank you Chris and Aaron for your replies!
Adam Steinquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-04-2022, 11:27 AM   #5
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,541 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

As chris stated, the stock is not original and is pretty poorly shaped. Based on the wood alone on that gun, I would not get into it.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 03-05-2022, 09:15 AM   #6
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

An easy check is to look for the stock serial number under the trigger guard tang.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-05-2022, 09:21 AM   #7
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,541 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Day View Post
An easy check is to look for the stock serial number under the trigger guard tang.
I will say it again, that is not the be-all-end-all way to tell anything. Just because a stock has numbers under the guard, does NOT make it original.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brian Dudley For Your Post:
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Unread 03-05-2022, 12:06 PM   #8
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

Ok I didn’t say that it was the “be all end all”did I ? Without the serial number , non originality is clear. With the serial number , originality is generally certain. Some good stock makers have been known to stamp the serial number as was done on original guns. If the stock was poorly done , then the serial number presence would not help towards originality.

So I disagree that the stock serial number fails to tell anything. But then I am not an expert on Parkers or any other gun.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-06-2022, 09:20 AM   #9
Member
Milton C Starr
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,501
Thanks: 475
Thanked 1,001 Times in 463 Posts

Default

Looks like someone also cut about 2" off the forend?
Milton C Starr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.