Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-18-2019, 04:41 PM   #21
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 969
Thanks: 1,302
Thanked 1,403 Times in 599 Posts

Default

I wonder if in a blind test any of us could differentiate a 35 fps difference?
Daniel Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-18-2019, 04:44 PM   #22
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,621
Thanked 33,238 Times in 12,378 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Carter View Post
I wonder if in a blind test any of us could differentiate a 35 fps difference?
I wonder if our guns could....





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-18-2019, 04:45 PM   #23
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,911
Thanks: 9,940
Thanked 1,757 Times in 732 Posts

Default

I, for the most part, shoot 1/8 oz light for gauge at 1150 fps +-.
10 gauge 1 1/8 oz
12 gauge 1 oz
16 gauge 7/8 oz
20 gauge 3/4 oz
It's easy on the gun and me. There are exceptions when I'm hunting waterfowl and only expect to shoot a few times.
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post:
Unread 02-18-2019, 04:52 PM   #24
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,640
Thanks: 35,621
Thanked 33,238 Times in 12,378 Posts

Default

A Good practice Harry, and I'll bet the birds can't tell the difference.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 02-18-2019, 05:09 PM   #25
Member
Woodcock survey
PGCA Member
 
Daniel Carter's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 969
Thanks: 1,302
Thanked 1,403 Times in 599 Posts

Default

Harry I am with you, I have reloaded all my target, hunting shells since the 60's, including steel and bismuth. I have found that the light loads are more effective for me. 1 oz in a 10 is a great crow load, 7/8 in a 12 will do any target game except 27 yard trap. Only problem is nobody believes me !!
Daniel Carter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daniel Carter For Your Post:
Unread 02-18-2019, 05:24 PM   #26
Member
Harry Collins
PGCA Member
 
Harry Collins's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,911
Thanks: 9,940
Thanked 1,757 Times in 732 Posts

Default

Dean, you can't tell the difference in they way they kill birds or break clays. These dove were shot with 3/4 oz loads and I barely went over a box of shells for fifteen birds. I sometimes go 1/4 oz light for load with great results.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg fullsizeoutput_1532.jpg (576.9 KB, 1 views)
Harry Collins is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Harry Collins For Your Post:
Damascas Barrels /MODERN SHELLS
Unread 02-18-2019, 06:44 PM   #27
Member
I M Hunter
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts

Default Damascas Barrels /MODERN SHELLS

I have shot damascus barrels of all kinds ,with a variety of ammo for over 30 years, and I have not had any issues ,other than Dead Game . The Double Gun Journal ,writer ,Sherman Bell conducted research on damascas and nitro steel barrels ,comparing the two types, upping the pressure, until they blew up. I am not recommending to anyone how or what to shoot ,Also the English have, continued using damascus barrels ,for over 130 years. By the way my preference
is for 2 1/2 inch shells ,1oz of shot in damascus or nitro steel.The game is just as dead as being shot with a magnum shell !


Thanks Larry
Larry Dever is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Larry Dever For Your Post:
Unread 02-18-2019, 07:40 PM   #28
Member
Ken Hill
PGCA Member
 
Ken Hill's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 710
Thanks: 881
Thanked 720 Times in 361 Posts

Default

I may have missed something reading through this thread. With any older gun, I would be more concerned with pressure. Pressure and recoil have two different effects on the gun. Pressure is generated from the shell loading and if the barrels are thin, then problems happen. Pressure is based on the powder type and grains; and shot charge. As Bruce mentioned, recoil is based on shot charge and velocity. Felt recoil can also vary based on the gun weight and fit.

As others mentioned, have the barrels checked for minimal wall thickness. Additionally, find out the pressure being produced by the shell.

Ken
Ken Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-18-2019, 07:51 PM   #29
Member
Bruce Day
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bruce Day's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,993
Thanks: 552
Thanked 15,615 Times in 2,667 Posts

Default

If a person uses reasonable shot and powder charges appropriate to the gauge, chamber pressure will be below or way below maximum service load pressure. Proof and service chamber pressures for Parkers are listed in TPS.

This would not include these ultra magnum loads which take advantage of the increase in proof pressure by SAAMI in the 1960s. No prairie storm black cloud artillery shells. And for 16’s , be wary of more than 1 oz at 2 3/4 Dre.
Bruce Day is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce Day For Your Post:
Unread 02-18-2019, 08:01 PM   #30
Member
mobirdhunter
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Garry L Gordon's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,704
Thanks: 13,265
Thanked 9,597 Times in 3,088 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Hill View Post
I may have missed something reading through this thread. With any older gun, I would be more concerned with pressure. Pressure and recoil have two different effects on the gun. Pressure is generated from the shell loading and if the barrels are thin, then problems happen. Pressure is based on the powder type and grains; and shot charge. As Bruce mentioned, recoil is based on shot charge and velocity. Felt recoil can also vary based on the gun weight and fit.

As others mentioned, have the barrels checked for minimal wall thickness. Additionally, find out the pressure being produced by the shell.

Ken
I am absolutely not an expert, but I agree with Ken, and although I know that recoil is [I]related[I] to velocity of load and that load's mass, recoil and pressure are not one and the same. You can get standard loads for a 16 gauge (or any other gauge for that matter) to produce a variety of pressures and speeds by changing the components. You can make some adjustments to the [U]felt[U] recoil (not the same as recoil) by adding or subtracting gun weight, reconfiguring the degree of drop in the stock, etc.

I still can't see why we need to shoot high pressure and/or high speed loads in these guns we cherish so much.
__________________
“Every day I wonder how many things I am dead wrong about.”
― Jim Harrison
"'I promise you,' he said, 'on my word of honor, I won't die on the opening of the bird season.'" -- Robert Ruark (from The Old Man and the Boy)
Garry L Gordon is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.