Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Non-Parker Specific & General Discussions Shotgun Shell Reloading

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 12-09-2010, 05:29 PM   #31
Member
Autumn Daze
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Dave Suponski's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 4,375
Thanked 4,048 Times in 1,727 Posts

Default

Thank you for the explanation Mark.
__________________
"Much care is bestowed to make it what the Sportsman needs-a good gun"-Charles Parker
Dave Suponski is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 05:33 PM   #32
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,300
Thanks: 464
Thanked 3,615 Times in 1,557 Posts

Default

I dunno. Has this been tested, or is it conjecture? Seems to me that the compression section of the wad would obviate most of that phenomenon.
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:10 PM   #33
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

John,

Test it yourself and let us know the results!

Follow the simple directions from my previous post. Load identical hulls and primers in loads at low psi and high psi. Shoot in the same barrel and examine the primers.

If however you use very hard primers such as Remingtons the flattening may be less or not evident. The Cheddites which I use easily flatten.

Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:18 PM   #34
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,300
Thanks: 464
Thanked 3,615 Times in 1,557 Posts

Default

Mark - I agree with that "Test", however, that doesn't answer my question whether or not hard shot causes high pressures. Can you say that hard shot has caused flat primers?

BTW, a friend of mine - a major league engineer for the big three, and a national caliber hot rodder, works up his high velocity rifle loads until he needs to use a mallet to open the bolt. Needless to say, I don't shoot on the bench next to him!
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:28 PM   #35
Member
Big Friend Ten (BFT)
PGCA Lifetime Member
 
Mark Ouellette's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,046
Thanks: 1,517
Thanked 2,933 Times in 795 Posts

Default

John,

Hard shot contributes to higher pressure. Before I noticed the 1500 PSI increase notice on the Nice Shot website I spied that my 7000 psi Nice Shot loads were slightly flattening the primers. That made me think... It wasn't long afterward that a fellow web-poster referred me to the Nice Shot warning.

I also recall recently reading something to this effect in an old shotgun book. I do remember that Askins wrote in The American Shotgun that 30% of the pellets are deformed upon firing. That book was published in 1921.

Mark
Mark Ouellette is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 06:40 PM   #36
Member
Big D
PGCA Member
 
John Dallas's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,300
Thanks: 464
Thanked 3,615 Times in 1,557 Posts

Default

I'm not doubting your experience, but I'm calling BS on the good Colonel. Howinell could he ever back up that statement?
I am a proponent of slow-burning powders as a means of reducing peak pressure, and the resulting "Poke" it generates. I do believe that more gentle "Push" results in fewer deformed pellets
John Dallas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-09-2010, 07:47 PM   #37
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,794 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

does any body have smokless loads for the brass 10 ga shell..i noticed somebody posted it didnot work for them in brass shells....just wandering.... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-14-2010, 10:35 AM   #38
Member
Paul Harm
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,774
Thanks: 44
Thanked 756 Times in 417 Posts

Default

It didn't work for me in 12ga- believe it was because the thin brass allowed more volume. I went up about half again [ 20 to 30grs] and still got bloppers. Seeing how I've already blown up one gun I quit trying. Paul
Paul Harm is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Paul Harm's homepage!
Unread 12-14-2010, 11:43 AM   #39
Member
charlie cleveland
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,986
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7,794 Times in 3,967 Posts

Default

thanks paul... ive tried smokeless also in the brass shell with a lot of bloopers...i will keep trying.. i was using blue dot and herco powders...may try a faster burning powder....or maybe i need to go to a hotter primer ive always used whinchester primers...any suggestions from anybody..... charlie
charlie cleveland is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-15-2010, 07:15 AM   #40
Member
ch
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
calvin humburg's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,816
Thanks: 1,654
Thanked 640 Times in 351 Posts

Default

Somebody told me you need a good crimp to make smokeless work. Compressed shell with crimp to hold it tight??????????? ch
calvin humburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.