Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Can chokes be opened by shooting over many years?
Unread 07-09-2018, 09:24 AM   #1
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default Can chokes be opened by shooting over many years?

I never thought that the degree of constriction could be lessened by shooting. However, I just restored a Trojan that was owned by my uncle. He bought the gun in 1921 new. He used it hard over many years on ducks and pheasants. The checkering was just about worn off. He took care of the gun but just about all of the original finish was missing. He ordered the gun with modified and full chokes. I know for a fact that he never altered the gun in any way. I am the second ownert of this gun.

My dillema is that the right barrel is now almost cylinder. The left barrel is about improved modified. Barring a mistake at the factory, it would appear that the chokes were opened by many years of shooting. I never thought this possible. But now I am questioning my thoughts.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom Flanigan For Your Post:
Unread 07-09-2018, 09:32 AM   #2
Member
King Cobb
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Bill Holcombe's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,325
Thanks: 724
Thanked 1,521 Times in 405 Posts

Default

I would find it surprising. I know of a family friend who has an old family parker that has been hunted and shot hard at trap and skeet, and its chokes are still factory.
__________________
"The Parker gun was the first and the greatest ever." Theophilus Nash Buckingham
Bill Holcombe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 09:37 AM   #3
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default

It's a real dilemma for me Bill. I never thought it possible. Maybe the most logical answer is a mistake at the factory. But he successfully shot ducks with that gun for many years, some at long range. I am baffled.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 09:54 AM   #4
Member
ED J, MORGAN
PGCA Lifetime
Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 447
Thanks: 1,550
Thanked 529 Times in 171 Posts

Default

Did he use steel shot??
ED J, MORGAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 09:55 AM   #5
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,797
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 8,138 Times in 3,254 Posts

Default

i would think you would need to shoot some sort of abrasive material to affect the chokes

lead certainly wouldn't, steel would bulge them but not wear them
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 09:58 AM   #6
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ED J, MORGAN View Post
Did he use steel shot??
He was dead long before steel shot. He shot Ajax Heavies mostly, some of which I still have. He really liked the varnish type finish on those shells. He said they were the most water resistant.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 10:01 AM   #7
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default

Thinking about it, I have another theory. I used a Galazan choke gauge because I don't have anything better at the moment. But I can't imagine it being that far off. Also, I feel no resistance when pushing a swab through the right barrel. I get a lot of resistance on the left barrel. I don't think that this is a mystery that will ever be resolved.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 10:37 AM   #8
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,557
Thanks: 35,430
Thanked 33,039 Times in 12,321 Posts

Default

Due to lead residue I have a 28 gauge that was ordered F/F but when I first brought it home it measured XXF/XF due to lead fouling and never having been properly cleaned. Obviously happened before shot cups came about.

The factory might have had a slightly different interpretation for chokesX.000" than we do today and shot cups of today play significantly into that.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 10:46 AM   #9
Member
Tom Flanigan
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Tom Flanigan's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 865
Thanks: 284
Thanked 1,253 Times in 425 Posts

Default

My 28 bore Holland leads up terribly when not using shot cups. I have to really work the choke area after each shooting session. The lead is difficult to remove and it takes time. It is bored IC and Full. I never use shot cups for my grouse shells. Question for you Dean....tell me how you use Frontier pads to clean up rusted bores.
Tom Flanigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-09-2018, 11:19 AM   #10
Member
Southpaw
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 653
Thanks: 634
Thanked 275 Times in 197 Posts

Default

I always thought a choke determination in most of those records was based on how many pellets of certain shot size and load amount would hit in a circle at a specific yardage. They would test fire and then would count the result and labels gun choke in records and even put the results with a tag of the gun. I think this could result in inconsistent vagaries. I think the modern methodology we more heavily rely on now looks at the constriction measurements. Obviously there could be some deviation and the original process could have a lot of inconsistencies but if gun performed within an accepted standard of deviation then it was labeled a certain way.

It could be interesting if you had the actual test results of gun that came out factory labeled as such and then reapply the same method today see if there is a big difference. Lots of variable could change results, like shot deformation. Lots factors to consider even the use of a modern shot cup.
Todd Poer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Todd Poer For Your Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.