Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Aftermarket ejectors on 1900 DH
Unread 04-21-2017, 05:40 PM   #1
Member
Mike Poindexter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 518
Thanks: 570
Thanked 632 Times in 246 Posts

Default Aftermarket ejectors on 1900 DH

Gents: I bought a 1900 DH with extensive carving and engraving beyond factory (although the factory stuff is really nice) and found aftermarket ejectors installed. The gun letters as a DH ordered from Washington State, and returned in 1917 for cleanup etc. I shot a round of clays and the ejectors work fine. The question is, who made them? I googled and found no patents or drawings that looked anything like the ones on this gun. Lots of milling, drilling, sawing and fitting to do this installation. Any insights would be appreciated. Best.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1863.jpg (489.1 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1864.jpg (486.3 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1865.jpg (488.2 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1866.jpg (485.5 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1867.JPG (485.0 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1881.JPG (349.9 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1871.jpg (490.5 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1880.jpg (487.5 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_1882.jpg (472.5 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg wm_8306288.jpg (89.1 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg wm_8306291.jpg (87.4 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg wm_8306289.jpg (362.3 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg wm_8306292.jpg (348.3 KB, 14 views)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 12 Ga DH letter.pdf (673.4 KB, 12 views)
Mike Poindexter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2017, 06:01 PM   #2
Member
Kensal Rise
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,769
Thanks: 583
Thanked 2,577 Times in 926 Posts

Default

First, you have a very nice gun there. Be proud. Especially if the ejectors work!

But... to assess which type they may be, we need to see the ejector box (under the forend iron) or the other actuating mechanism. Have more photos?
John Campbell is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Campbell For Your Post:
Unread 04-21-2017, 08:36 PM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,635
Thanks: 35,612
Thanked 33,231 Times in 12,375 Posts

Default

Lots of interesting and nicely done relief carving on the stock.

The engraving looks to me like very typical Grade 3 engraving for that period, with the exception of the wedges on the barrel breeches.

We'd like to see pictures of the top rib and the barrel flats. To me they look like what has been described to me as 'Belgian fluid steel barrels' using the lug from the original set of Damascus steel barrels. I have seen probably four Parkers, two Grade 4 guns and two Grade 3 guns, with what appear to be the same barrels, wedge engraving executed exactly like yours, and all.

Below is pictured a CH twenty-gauge that originally had 30" Damascus barrels. They were replaced with fluid steel barrels described to me as "Belgian." The wedge engraving on this set is much more elaborate than the other three I have seen. The others were engraved exactly like yours Mike.








.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 183528-1.jpg (72.5 KB, 2 views)
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 04-21-2017, 09:59 PM   #4
Member
wayne goerres
Forum Associate

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,096
Thanks: 2
Thanked 626 Times in 380 Posts

Default

If the barrels were replaced with Belgium barrels would there not be Belgium proof marks on the flats.
wayne goerres is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wayne goerres For Your Post:
Unread 04-21-2017, 11:17 PM   #5
Member
David Noble
PGCA Member
 
David Noble's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 917
Thanks: 1,319
Thanked 1,093 Times in 387 Posts

Default

Mike, this ejector system looks very similar to a DH(E) ser# 149011 that I own.
Here is a link to another thread from 2013 where we were discussing aftermarket ejector systems. My gun, which is very similar to yours is on page 2 of that thread. It has a picture of the ejector hammers and springs under the forearm wood.
I hope to find out someday just who's ejector system this is.
http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthread.php?t=12158
David Noble is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2017, 06:47 AM   #6
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,635
Thanks: 35,612
Thanked 33,231 Times in 12,375 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne goerres View Post
If the barrels were replaced with Belgium barrels would there not be Belgium proof marks on the flats.
Not necessarily. If the tubes were imported to the US they wouldn't have been proofed.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2017, 08:01 AM   #7
Member
OH Osthaus
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Rick Losey's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,808
Thanks: 1,646
Thanked 8,157 Times in 3,260 Posts

Default

remember that most of the damascus tubes used came from Belgium - and carried no Liege proofs
__________________
"If there is a heaven it must have thinning aspen gold, and flighting woodcock, and a bird dog" GBE
Rick Losey is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2017, 02:08 PM   #8
Member
Mike Poindexter
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 518
Thanks: 570
Thanked 632 Times in 246 Posts

Default

David: Thanks for the link to the previous thread. I think our two aftermarket ejectors are the same design, if not the same installer. Definitely not the Wolfersperger patent. As EM used to say, "investigation continues." My barrels are original Titanic 30" with no strikeovers, and letter as such. Here are the flats. While they do not have a T stamp, they are almost identical to set of Titanic barrels from my C grade only two years later. Those flats are shown in the next pic. Both show the King inspection stamp and unstruck weight, but no T for steel type. A copy of my Parker letter is loaded as a pdf file at the bottom of my original post for anybody to open--it was too large to print out as an attachment. My impression is that, like today, back then there were probably a few dozen master smiths around the county who could do amazing things to guns. Most of their names are probably lost to antiquity. Thanks again, and thanks to all the other commenters for their input.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1883.jpg (486.2 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg SSC_0151.JPG (181.7 KB, 0 views)
Mike Poindexter is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2017, 05:40 PM   #9
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,635
Thanks: 35,612
Thanked 33,231 Times in 12,375 Posts

Default

The 4 stamped toward the breech end of the flats indicate the barrels or, in the case of the possibility of sleeved barrels, the 'breech block' were/was made for a Grade 4 or CH Parker.






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 04-22-2017, 10:14 PM   #10
Member
B. Dudley
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Brian Dudley's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,584
Thanks: 476
Thanked 17,537 Times in 4,621 Posts

Default

There was a period where many barrels do not have the steel type stamped on them. Usually when i see them, they are fluid steel.

I am not familiar with any sort of grade stamping being put on the barrel flats of Parker guns.
__________________
B. Dudley
Brian Dudley is offline   Reply With Quote
Visit Brian Dudley's homepage!
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.