Bite my tongue?

[Victor Wasylyna]

Originally Posted by Richard Flanders

There's just nothing to be gained by putting it out there for the entire internet world to see... nothing.

While I support the original poster and oppose treating shotgun-related service providers with special kid gloves, I would support keeping such threads under the member-only section. The PGCA is too generous to non-members. The reloading forum is a great example.

-Victor

[Spin Drift]

How about we handle this from the positive side. Make a sticky that has only positive reviews of work done with pictures of the work for proof. Have a counter for each gunsmith by name. The good ones will have lots of examples posted. Not so good ones won't. The entries can only be done by members to cut down on spammers.

I have 3 C grades that deserve to be conserved. Who do you go too?

Spin

[Craig Budgeon]

Using this forum or club members to critique gunsniths work will destroy this forum. At present I view this forum as an educational resource and as a worthy news source. If this forum is used to criticize gunsmiths, why not dealers, advertisers, members nonmembers, and yes even directors.If you want your gun to meet your expectations when delivered to you, document everything you want done, expected delivery, expected cost, and altered choices (expect to pay). Document all communications person, date, time, and specifics of conversations. Do your homework on the gunsmith you propose to use. Good communications tends to produce good results

[Bill Murphy]

Criticize directors??

[Dean Romig]

Bill, if you want 'change' you should run for a future directors position, oh no wait.... There would be too much criticism.





.

[BRDHNTR]

Hasn't this thread exhausted itself by now?