Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums  

Go Back   Parker Gun Collectors Association Forums Parker Forums General Parker Discussions

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Grade 5 Hammer Guns With Steel Barrels
Unread 09-18-2017, 07:37 AM   #1
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,100
Thanks: 2,946
Thanked 11,545 Times in 3,106 Posts

Default Grade 5 Hammer Guns With Steel Barrels

Mark Conrad's Beautiful Grade 5 Hammer gun was a huge coincidence for me, in that a friend just purchased a Grade 5 Hammer gun receiver, with locks.

http://parkerguns.org/forums/showthr...107#post225107

In looking up the serial number, 108658, stamped on the water table of the receiver, more mystery surfaced. It is listed in the "Book" as 'T5 H 0 C 12 30'

Dean pointed out a comment in the Serialization book (actually on Page 64)
" Probably a keystroke error, possibly a grade 3 gun with Titanic Steel barrels."
Not to mention it is also listed as 'H', meaning hammerless.

This entry, in itself seems to be a 'keystroke error' as it is listed as "T5", and not 'T3'.

The emailed images are not clear at all, but I got to examine the receiver in the flesh, and it is clearly marked with a '5' on the watertable, clearly stamped 108658, and one look at the teardrops on the bolsters, and the hammers, and the engraving, proves it to be a Grade 5.
Now the unanswered question is, were there in fact 5 of these guns, as indicated in TPS, or is this a sixth?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 108658 Grade 5 Receiver.JPG (23.4 KB, 336 views)
File Type: jpg 108658 Watertable.JPG (24.2 KB, 339 views)
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2017, 07:52 AM   #2
Member
Ed Blake
PGCA Member

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,259
Thanks: 735
Thanked 824 Times in 334 Posts

Default

Does your friend have plans for that receiver or did he buy it as a paperweight?
Ed Blake is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2017, 08:15 AM   #3
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,634
Thanks: 35,603
Thanked 33,228 Times in 12,374 Posts

Default

There is no question as to the grade of that receiver being a 5.

I firmly believe the 'keystroke error' was the omission of the "I" in what should have been TI5.

Depending on what records PGCA Research Chairman Chuck Bishop may have on 108658 the number of these specific TI5 guns may remain at 5 or may actually become 6.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 09-18-2017, 08:57 AM   #4
Member
Bill Murphy
PGCA Lifetime
Member Since
Second Grade

Member Info
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,586
Thanks: 6,158
Thanked 8,862 Times in 4,751 Posts

Default

Wow, I want that receiver.
Bill Murphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2017, 08:58 AM   #5
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,100
Thanks: 2,946
Thanked 11,545 Times in 3,106 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Blake View Post
Does your friend have plans for that receiver or did he buy it as a paperweight?
Ed, that depends on who you ask. He will tell you it's a 'project'. I am certain it will remain a beautiful paperweight.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-18-2017, 07:16 PM   #6
Member
edgarspencer
PGCA Member
 
edgarspencer's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,100
Thanks: 2,946
Thanked 11,545 Times in 3,106 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy View Post
Wow, I want that receiver.
Bill, If you put your thinking cap on, you'll figure out who bought it. I'm sure he would love to sell it to you. I'm only investing in projects I can finish before bedtime.
edgarspencer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-19-2017, 08:59 AM   #7
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,870
Thanks: 1,207
Thanked 4,971 Times in 1,421 Posts

Default

The Serialization Book is wrong. It is indeed a B grade hammer gun 12ga. with Titanic 32" barrels and a straight grip stock. The order book entry has quite a few specific special requests as to how he wanted the gun built such as stock dimensions, trigger pulls, type of shell to pattern with, etc. Too bad he has just the receiver!

Unfortunately, the stock book for this gun is missing, therefore the info found in the Serialization Book was taken from the order books. Remember that when the Serialization Book was compiled, grade D guns and above were searched for in the order books and if those guns were not listed in the stock books, those guns were added to the Serialization Book. It's hard to imagine the work that took place to compile all this data. Little wonder that mistakes were made and few at that compared to the number of guns listed.

Since Mark's gun is also a B grade 12ga. hammer gun with 32" Titanic barrels, 108658 would be 2nd known to exist.
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 09-19-2017, 09:24 AM   #8
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,634
Thanks: 35,603
Thanked 33,228 Times in 12,374 Posts

Default

Chuck, can you comment on there having been 5 or 6 of these Titanic barreled guns made.
Do we kno the serial numbers of the 5 accounted for in the tables in "The Parker Story"?






.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dean Romig For Your Post:
Unread 09-19-2017, 10:17 AM   #9
Member
Pa SxS
Research Chairman
PGCA Lifetime
Member
 
Chuck Bishop's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,870
Thanks: 1,207
Thanked 4,971 Times in 1,421 Posts

Default

Dean, this can get very confusing! From the appendix in TPS they list 5 TI5 hammer guns. S/N's 91632,94269,102517,102518, and 112752. Notice that Edgar's example 108658 is not listed in the appendix but we do have the order book for that gun, therefore 108658 should have been included in the Serialization Book and appendix but wasn't. Mark's gun 92850 is listed in the appendix as being a hammerless gun so it wasn't included as 1 of the 5 known TI5 hammer guns.

From what we now know, there were at least 7 TI5 guns made. Am I thinking correctly?
Chuck Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Chuck Bishop For Your Post:
Unread 09-19-2017, 10:32 AM   #10
Member
Dean Romig
PGCA Invincible
Life Member
 
Dean Romig's Avatar

Member Info
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 31,634
Thanks: 35,603
Thanked 33,228 Times in 12,374 Posts

Default

That sounds right Chuck. On top of the 5 known there are (at least) 2 more incorrectly documented.





.
__________________
"I'm a Setter man.
Not because I think they're better than the other breeds,
but because I'm a romantic - stuck on tradition - and to me, a Setter just "belongs" in the grouse picture."

George King, "That's Ruff", 2010 - a timeless classic.
Dean Romig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Parkerguns.org
Copyright © 2004 Design par Megatekno
- 2008 style update 3.7 avec l'autorisation de son auteur par Stradfred.